Waste less time on Facebook — follow Brilliant.
×

A 2016 Problem

Is it possible for both the sum and product of 2016 integers to be 2016?

Note by Mehul Arora
6 months, 4 weeks ago

No vote yet
1 vote

Comments

Sort by:

Top Newest

Answer is yes. Here are the numbers:

\[ \{ \underbrace{ -1, -1, -1, \ldots, -1}_{\text{504 times}} , \underbrace{ 1, 1, 1, \ldots, 1}_{\text{1510 times}} , 2, 1008 \} \]

The trick is to have an even number of (-1)'s so that the product is positive, then we construct a system of equations of the number of (-1)'s and (1)'s that satisfy the conditions. Pi Han Goh · 6 months, 4 weeks ago

Log in to reply

@Pi Han Goh Came up with the same set. :) Kshitij Alwadhi · 6 months, 4 weeks ago

Log in to reply

@Pi Han Goh Is there like a more "mathematical" solution to it? More like a variable-type solution?

Like, I agree the trick works, but ...... Mehul Arora · 6 months, 4 weeks ago

Log in to reply

@Mehul Arora What do you mean? Are you saying you want me to show my working? Pi Han Goh · 6 months, 4 weeks ago

Log in to reply

@Pi Han Goh Very Precisely, yes. I mean, don't get me wrong, but how did you exactly wind up on this solution? Mehul Arora · 6 months, 4 weeks ago

Log in to reply

@Mehul Arora Okay for starters. Let one of the numbers be 2016. So the product of the remaining numbers must be 1, and the sum of these 2015 remaining numbers is equal to 0, and these numbers must be \(\pm \; 1 \) only. Let \(E\) and \(P\) denote the number of \(-1\)'s and \(1\)'s, then we have \(E + P = 2015 \) and \(P-E = 0 \). Solving these diophantine equation shows that there is no solution.

Now let two of the numbers be 2 and \(\frac{2016}2 = 1008 \). So the product of the remaining numbers must be 1, and the sum of these 2014 remaining numbers is equal to 0,and these numbers must be \(\pm \; 1 \) only. Let \(E\) and \(P\) denote the number of \(-1\)'s and \(1\)'s, then we have \(E + P = 2014\) and \(P-E = 2016-2-1008 \). Solving these diophantine equation shows \(E = 504, P = 1510 \), hence my answer above.

Note that there are more than one answer. Here's another solution:

\[ \{ -6, \underbrace{-1,-1,-1, \ldots , -1}_{\text{9 times}} ,\underbrace{1,1,1, \ldots , 1}_{\text{2002 times}} , 2, 2,4, 21 \} \] Pi Han Goh · 6 months, 4 weeks ago

Log in to reply

@Pi Han Goh Oh okay, so basically we show that one solution exists, and that ends the question. Hmm, great :)

Thanks for helping :D Mehul Arora · 6 months, 4 weeks ago

Log in to reply

@Kunal Jain We have the solution. Mehul Arora · 6 months, 4 weeks ago

Log in to reply

@Mehul Arora And btw, Congratulations to u both and Vaibhav for NSTSE.

How was the paper this time? Kshitij Alwadhi · 6 months, 4 weeks ago

Log in to reply

@Mehul Arora Where was this question asked? Kshitij Alwadhi · 6 months, 4 weeks ago

Log in to reply

@Kshitij Alwadhi This question was asked at some competition< id on't exactly remember the name. Mehul Arora · 6 months, 4 weeks ago

Log in to reply

@Mehul Arora Ya, I saw the result. Kshitij Alwadhi · 6 months, 4 weeks ago

Log in to reply

@Kshitij Alwadhi "Also, Bro I came third!'. I think by this he meant, coming third doesnt need congratulatios as the paper was super easy :P Kunal Jain · 6 months, 4 weeks ago

Log in to reply

@Kunal Jain Oh ! So it was in that sense xD Kshitij Alwadhi · 6 months, 4 weeks ago

Log in to reply

@Mehul Arora I already knew it the 1 I wrote was 504, (-4), 1 X 1765, (-1) X 249 Kunal Jain · 6 months, 4 weeks ago

Log in to reply

Hmmm. Are the integers distinct? Aditya Kumar · 6 months, 4 weeks ago

Log in to reply

@Aditya Kumar Well, 2016 doesn't have 2016 distinct factors! Ameya Daigavane · 6 months, 1 week ago

Log in to reply

@Ameya Daigavane Ahha, certainly. Well noticed. Mehul Arora · 6 months, 1 week ago

Log in to reply

@Aditya Kumar No, that would've been mentioned. :) Mehul Arora · 6 months, 4 weeks ago

Log in to reply

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...