Prove the following combinatorial:

*The number of ways of placing \(n\) labeled balls into \(n\) indistinguishable boxes is equal to*

\[\dfrac{\displaystyle \sum_{k=0}^{\infty} \dfrac {(k+1)^{n-1}}{k!}}{e}\]

No vote yet

1 vote

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...

Easy Math Editor

`*italics*`

or`_italics_`

italics`**bold**`

or`__bold__`

boldNote: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctlyparagraph 1

paragraph 2

`[example link](https://brilliant.org)`

`> This is a quote`

Remember to wrap math in \( ... \) or \[ ... \] to ensure proper formatting.`2 \times 3`

`2^{34}`

`a_{i-1}`

`\frac{2}{3}`

`\sqrt{2}`

`\sum_{i=1}^3`

`\sin \theta`

`\boxed{123}`

## Comments

Sort by:

TopNewestWhat you are counting is the Bell numbers, and your result is known as Dobinski's formula.

(By the way, this is not a bijection. A bijection is a 1-1 correspondence between two sets. What you want to prove is that a certain combinatorial formula is true.)

Log in to reply

OK, thanks! However, I thought that a bijection could be constructed between these two by changing the summation.

Log in to reply

Okay so I have a solution for putting \(n\) balls in

\(k\) boxes:exactlyDefine a function that takes an ordered pair of naturals to a nonnegative integer:

\(f(n,k)=\begin{cases} 1 & k=1 \\ 1 & n=k \\0 & k>n\\kf(n-1,k)+f(n-1,k-1) & \text{for other cases}\end{cases}\)

This function should satisfy it if my LaTeX is correct.

Now for putting \(n\) balls in \(n\) boxes, just do

\(\displaystyle \sum_{x=1}^{n}f(n,x)\)

Log in to reply

Now you just need to biject this summation to the other summation.

Log in to reply

I looked it up and it I haven't seen any solutions which use a combinatorial bijection.

Log in to reply

Log in to reply

Are you sure that's correct? For example when \(n=1\) we have \(1\) way of putting a ball in a box, but the sum indicates that there are a few more than 1 way; for \(k=0\) that term alone is already \(1\).

Log in to reply

I forgot to put a denominator in the sum but it has been rectified.

Log in to reply