Waste less time on Facebook — follow Brilliant.
×

A Moderator's Apology

I keep on disputing numerous problems of this type. I don't understand why the answer is so obvious to the author.

In my opinion, these questions are not really good.

I'll take Spiked Math's help to illustrate this out:

Spiked

Spiked

Moral: There are infinite formulae that fits a finite number of elements. There is no best fit formula. It is just your perception

Fit

Fit

Note by Agnishom Chattopadhyay
3 years, 1 month ago

No vote yet
1 vote

  Easy Math Editor

MarkdownAppears as
*italics* or _italics_ italics
**bold** or __bold__ bold

- bulleted
- list

  • bulleted
  • list

1. numbered
2. list

  1. numbered
  2. list
Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly
paragraph 1

paragraph 2

paragraph 1

paragraph 2

[example link](https://brilliant.org)example link
> This is a quote
This is a quote
    # I indented these lines
    # 4 spaces, and now they show
    # up as a code block.

    print "hello world"
# I indented these lines
# 4 spaces, and now they show
# up as a code block.

print "hello world"
MathAppears as
Remember to wrap math in \( ... \) or \[ ... \] to ensure proper formatting.
2 \times 3 \( 2 \times 3 \)
2^{34} \( 2^{34} \)
a_{i-1} \( a_{i-1} \)
\frac{2}{3} \( \frac{2}{3} \)
\sqrt{2} \( \sqrt{2} \)
\sum_{i=1}^3 \( \sum_{i=1}^3 \)
\sin \theta \( \sin \theta \)
\boxed{123} \( \boxed{123} \)

Comments

Sort by:

Top Newest

image

image

Fit this polynomial

Krishna Sharma - 3 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

"much solution"

"very logic"

LMAO!!!

John Muradeli - 3 years ago

Log in to reply

Find the next number of the sequence

\(1, 1, 1, 120, ?\)

Ans: \(25852016738884976640000\), because

\(\Gamma (\Gamma (1))=1\)
\(\Gamma (\Gamma (2))=1\)
\(\Gamma (\Gamma (3))=1\)
\(\Gamma (\Gamma (4))=120\)
\(\Gamma (\Gamma (5))=25852016738884976640000\)

Michael Mendrin - 3 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

Oh man, I just saw this post, I should have used this for TKC.

Pi Han Goh - 2 years, 10 months ago

Log in to reply

Hi; whenever I see those type questions I always just fit a polynomial through them. Admittedly, it was tough with Q2.

Bobbym None - 3 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

:D I agree with you. I fit the polynomial too. But when I try to enter the answer, Brilliant says that only integer values are allowed.

Agnishom Chattopadhyay - 3 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

Loved it .

Azhaghu Roopesh M - 3 years ago

Log in to reply

So, here's the ultimate way to cure this problem:

Let us come up with a way to put a polynomial through any set of inputs and outputs x and y.

Any clues?

For example, I defined one as follows:

Find the next number in the sequence: \(0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,__\)

Ans: 10!

Now if there was a way to, say, put a function through something like 1, 4, 9, 16, 25, __ - that'd be great.

John Muradeli - 3 years ago

Log in to reply

This is the standard W|A/Mathematica command for fitting a polynomial

InterpolatingPolynomial[{1,4,9,16},x]

replace {1,4,9,16} with a set of your own data

Log in to reply

Well I am against those" odd number out of the set" type questions. I mean there we will always be able to choose a suitable prime p for which any 3 are quadratic residues while left one isn't

Subrata Saha - 3 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

1,3, and guess what's next? Something incomputable. Its the tree function. Next, 1, 1, 2, and guess what? Depends on the number of !'s. 0!!...=1, 1!!...=1, 2!!...=2, 3!!...=???

Aloysius Ng - 3 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...