×

# A Most Curious Algebraic Identity

I recently found a very interesting Algebraic Identity: $xyz+(x+y)(y+z)(z+x)=(x+y+z)(xy+yz+zx)$

What's so special about it? Note that going from one side of the equality to the other, all products are switched with sums, and all sums are switched with products!

This may be seen a bit easier if I rewrite it as follows: \begin{align*} &\color{white}{)}x\color{red}{\times} y\color{red}{\times }z \color{white}{)}\color{blue}{+} \color{grey}{(}x\color{blue}{+}y\color{grey}{)}\color{red}{\times}\color{grey}{(}y\color{blue}{+}z\color{grey}{)}\color{red}{\times} \color{grey}{(}z\color{blue}{+}x\color{grey}{)}\\ =&\color{grey}{(}x\color{blue}{+}y\color{blue}{+}z\color{grey}{)}\color{red}{\times}\color{grey}{(}x\color{red}{\times} y\hspace{0.9ex}\color{blue}{+}\hspace{0.9ex}y\color{red}{\times }z\color{white}{)}\color{blue}{+}\hspace{0.9ex}z\color{red}{\times }x\color{grey}{)} \end{align*}

Cool!

Note by Daniel Liu
2 years ago

## Comments

Sort by:

Top Newest

Yes; I really like this identity too. For example it can be used to prove that $$r_1 + r_2 + r_3 - r = 4R$$ (from Incircles and Excircles). If we substitute $$x = s-a$$ etc., then

$s(s-b)(s-c)+s(s-c)(s-a)+s(s-a)(s-b)-(s-a)(s-b)(s-c) = abc$

where $$s$$ is the semi-perimeter, and this reduces nicely using area formulas to the desired relationship. · 2 years ago

Log in to reply

@Michael Ng created this problem which uses the identity. Staff · 1 year, 11 months ago

Log in to reply

thanks @Daniel Liu i used this to solve problems like this i wrote a solution using this identity, and i'm thinking about a problem with this identity, will post soon! · 1 year, 11 months ago

Log in to reply

F B U L O U S !!!!!! · 1 year, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

I didn't realise that- thanks. It should inspire some good problems :) · 2 years ago

Log in to reply

Most awesome discoveries ever!Thanks,this must help a lot. · 1 year, 11 months ago

Log in to reply

Thanks. I too did not realize this very useful identity. · 1 year, 12 months ago

Log in to reply

I didn't examine. Good for making questions. However, it could have been found by people in the past. · 1 year, 12 months ago

Log in to reply

Yea, I'm just saying that I just noticed it. I most likely was not the person who discovered it (as seen by the comment by Michael Ng) · 1 year, 12 months ago

Log in to reply

I had just expanded both sides to compare. Should be correct. Do not feel disappointed by what I guessed. You could be the first person to find this. Congratulation! · 1 year, 12 months ago

Log in to reply

It's following the rules of principle of duality · 1 year, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

No, that is not the principle of duality. Staff · 1 year, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

I mean l'll bit similar to that · 1 year, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...