Waste less time on Facebook — follow Brilliant.
×

A Non-Inversible Function

If a function \(f(x)\) from reals to reals satisfies that \[2f(2x)-f(x^2)^2=1\] then prove that \(f^{-1}(x)\) does not exist.

source: me

Note by Daniel Liu
3 years, 6 months ago

No vote yet
1 vote

  Easy Math Editor

MarkdownAppears as
*italics* or _italics_ italics
**bold** or __bold__ bold

- bulleted
- list

  • bulleted
  • list

1. numbered
2. list

  1. numbered
  2. list
Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly
paragraph 1

paragraph 2

paragraph 1

paragraph 2

[example link](https://brilliant.org)example link
> This is a quote
This is a quote
    # I indented these lines
    # 4 spaces, and now they show
    # up as a code block.

    print "hello world"
# I indented these lines
# 4 spaces, and now they show
# up as a code block.

print "hello world"
MathAppears as
Remember to wrap math in \( ... \) or \[ ... \] to ensure proper formatting.
2 \times 3 \( 2 \times 3 \)
2^{34} \( 2^{34} \)
a_{i-1} \( a_{i-1} \)
\frac{2}{3} \( \frac{2}{3} \)
\sqrt{2} \( \sqrt{2} \)
\sum_{i=1}^3 \( \sum_{i=1}^3 \)
\sin \theta \( \sin \theta \)
\boxed{123} \( \boxed{123} \)

Comments

Sort by:

Top Newest

We basically have to prove that there exists distinct\(x_1,x_2\) such that \(f(x_1)=f(x_2)\) because if \(f^{-1}(x)\) does exist under this, then \(f^{-1}(f(x_1))=x_1, f^{-1}(f(x_2))=x_2\), which violates the definition of a function that \(f(x)\) corresponds to at most one value.

For this problem simply take \(x=0,2\) and we have it.

To elaberate, we first find a value \(x\) such that \(2x=x^2=y\) so that we get an equation with one variable, it turns out that this would lead to only one solution for \(f(y)\) since \((f(y)-1)^2=0\Rightarrow f(y)=1\). Since \(x^2=2x\) gives \(x=0,2\), we have \(f(0)=1,f(2)=1\).

Xuming Liang - 3 years, 6 months ago

Log in to reply

Excellent Solution. Did not think that way!

Avineil Jain - 3 years, 6 months ago

Log in to reply

Yep, that's correct. Quite an interesting problem, until you realize that the solution is very quick and easy.

Daniel Liu - 3 years, 6 months ago

Log in to reply

Comment deleted Jun 03, 2014

Log in to reply

nevermind I see it now! anyway I'm sorry for your loss...I wonder who downvoted your comment.

Xuming Liang - 3 years, 6 months ago

Log in to reply

Comment deleted Jun 03, 2014

Log in to reply

@Xuming Liang Oh so once you know \(f(4)=1\), plug in \(x=-2\) and say \(f(-4)=a\). The problem becomes

\[2a-1=1\]

and thus \(a=f(-4)=1\).

Finn Hulse - 3 years, 6 months ago

Log in to reply

For what domain?

Kanthi Deep - 3 years, 6 months ago

Log in to reply

I think all reals works, but if you see any contradiction feel free to tell me and I can change it.

Daniel Liu - 3 years, 6 months ago

Log in to reply

That's a good question to ask.

Calvin Lin Staff - 3 years, 6 months ago

Log in to reply

for x(2-x) has two solutions 0 and 2 .. !! the values of the function is 1 for two elements in its domain i.e x=0 and 2 .. its not onto .. !

Ramesh Goenka - 3 years, 6 months ago

Log in to reply

Put x=2, it gives f(4)=1 . Now differentiating the given equality, 4f'(2x)-2f(x^2)f'(x^2)*2x = 0. put x=2, it gives ,f(4)=1/2 ..clearly, the function is non-invertible..

Aamir Rafiq - 3 years, 6 months ago

Log in to reply

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...