A pressing problem with Kinetic Energy. ALL PHYSICISTS HELP!!

the equation for kinetic energy is actually used as 12mv2\frac{1}{2}mv^{2} as it is a very useful quantity and actually is derived from the work done by a force, without any changes to internal energy or potential energy of the system.

W=ΣFdrW = \int \Sigma\vec{F}\cdot d\vec{r}

Subbing in ΣF=ma\Sigma\vec{F} = m\vec{a}, you will get

W=madrW = \int m\vec{a}\cdot d\vec{r}

Subbing in a=dvdt\vec{a} = \frac{d\vec{v}}{dt}, you will get

W=mdvdtdrW = \int m\frac{d\vec{v}}{dt}\cdot d\vec{r}

Since v=drdt\vec{v}=\frac{d\vec{r}}{dt}, it implies that dr=vdtd\vec{r} = \vec{v}dt

W=mdvdtvdtW = \int m\frac{d\vec{v}}{dt}\cdot\vec{v}dt

W=vivfmvdvW = \int_{\vec{v}_i}^{\vec{v}_f} m\vec{v}\cdot d\vec{v}

W=12m(vfvf)12m(vivi)=12mvf212mvi2W = \frac{1}{2}m(\vec{v}_f \cdot \vec{v}_f) - \frac{1}{2}m(\vec{v}_i\cdot\vec{v}_i) = \frac{1}{2}mv_f {}^{2} - \frac{1}{2}mv_i{}^{2}

This showed that the quantity 12mv2\frac{1}{2}mv^{2} can be denoted as the energy of a moving object, and any change in kinetic energy must be from an external work done

However we know that the general definition of force is ΣF=dpdt\Sigma\vec{F}=\frac{d\vec{p}}{dt}

Hence work would be W=dpdtdrW = \int \frac{d\vec{p}}{dt}\cdot d\vec{r}.

Then from that kinetic energy should be derived, as it more accurately depicts motion of an object of changing mass. Then how do we derive dpdtdr\int \frac{d\vec{p}}{dt}\cdot d\vec{r}

PLEASE HELP THIS QN IS KILLING ME

Note by Saad Haider
6 years ago

No vote yet
1 vote

  Easy Math Editor

This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.

When posting on Brilliant:

  • Use the emojis to react to an explanation, whether you're congratulating a job well done , or just really confused .
  • Ask specific questions about the challenge or the steps in somebody's explanation. Well-posed questions can add a lot to the discussion, but posting "I don't understand!" doesn't help anyone.
  • Try to contribute something new to the discussion, whether it is an extension, generalization or other idea related to the challenge.
  • Stay on topic — we're all here to learn more about math and science, not to hear about your favorite get-rich-quick scheme or current world events.

MarkdownAppears as
*italics* or _italics_ italics
**bold** or __bold__ bold

- bulleted
- list

  • bulleted
  • list

1. numbered
2. list

  1. numbered
  2. list
Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly
paragraph 1

paragraph 2

paragraph 1

paragraph 2

[example link](https://brilliant.org)example link
> This is a quote
This is a quote
    # I indented these lines
    # 4 spaces, and now they show
    # up as a code block.

    print "hello world"
# I indented these lines
# 4 spaces, and now they show
# up as a code block.

print "hello world"
MathAppears as
Remember to wrap math in \( ... \) or \[ ... \] to ensure proper formatting.
2 \times 3 2×3 2 \times 3
2^{34} 234 2^{34}
a_{i-1} ai1 a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3} 23 \frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2} 2 \sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3 i=13 \sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta sinθ \sin \theta
\boxed{123} 123 \boxed{123}

Comments

Sort by:

Top Newest

It's similar. Hint: Product law for derivatives. dpdt=d(mv)dt=mdvdt+vdmdt\frac{dp}{dt}=\frac{d(mv)}{dt}=m\cdot\frac{dv}{dt}+v\cdot\frac{dm}{dt}. Note that dmdt=0\frac{dm}{dt}=0 for constant mass, that is the non-relativistic case. Note that F=maF=ma is not true for relativistic cases. (Sorry lazy to put vector arrows and stuff =P)

Yong See Foo - 6 years ago

Log in to reply

But what if mass is not constant so dmdt0\frac{dm}{dt} \neq 0

Saad Haider - 6 years ago

Log in to reply

Then you have to find out at what rate mm is changing wrt to tt and continue with the derivation.

Yong See Foo - 6 years ago

Log in to reply

@Yong See Foo Would not that be equivalent to saying KE12mv2KE\neq \frac{1}{2}mv^{2}

Saad Haider - 6 years ago

Log in to reply

@Saad Haider Exactly, that is what relativity is about.

Yong See Foo - 6 years ago

Log in to reply

Actually according to relativity, our mass is increasing with velocity but not that much. So, the kinetic energy formula holds. Also, the formula is m_{real}=\frac{m_{rest}}{\sqrt{1-\frac{v^{2}}{c^{2}}}

Fahad Shihab - 6 years ago

Log in to reply

dmv/dt .dr here dr/dt =v and mdv will be left so we can procede in the same way above

Pavansai Dosawada - 5 years, 4 months ago

Log in to reply

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...