If you have time, please do the following.

Think of a random integer.

If possible, please think of one now before reading the next lines.

.

.

If it is even, please comment 0.

If it is odd, please comment 1.

Note that 0 is even.

Thank you

If you have time, please do the following.

Think of a random integer.

If possible, please think of one now before reading the next lines.

.

.

If it is even, please comment 0.

If it is odd, please comment 1.

Note that 0 is even.

Thank you

No vote yet

1 vote

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...

## Comments

Sort by:

TopNewestIt's interesting how the vast majority are odd (19:7 ratio as of this moment, around 73% odd). This is statistically unusual considering that there is equal possibility for even and odd numbers to be made. I think I can explain this.

It is human nature to think that a number which is even is too rounded to be 'random', and since all even numbers are composite (trivial exception of 2), even numbers tend to be avoided.

Furthermore, chosing prime numbers is a popular trend when picking 'random' integers; we tend to think of numbers which are isolated. For example, prime numbers can be considered to be isolated, as it has no proper factors, hence there are no other numbers associated with it, as it were. Now, I understand prime numbers are not the most frequently generated 'random' numbers, but the fact that they are odd surely plays a part. This leads us to think odd numbers are more random than even numbers.

I guess this means that 'random' numbers generated by humans are not truly random.

Of course, this is only my speculation, based on my own experience. When I think of a random number, 37 comes to mind. I think the fact that both digits are odd, it's not too small or too big between 0 and 100, and it being prime leads me to believe it is the most random number. Ironically, if everyone thinks this way, it becomes one of the least random numbers.

Please feel free to post your opinions and speculations. – Jihoon Kang · 2 years, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

– Raghav Vaidyanathan · 2 years, 3 months ago

But there are people(like myself) who already have a predefined random number in mind. For example, if someone asks me to choose a number, I will always pick \(4\). This is just to avoid time spent in thinking of a random number. I know that this is not random, and the number of people who think this way are small, but yeah. Your observations make sense though.Log in to reply

this note which is inspired by you. – Archit Boobna · 2 years, 3 months ago

Please seeLog in to reply

@Jihoon Kang – Harsh Shrivastava · 2 years, 3 months ago

Hey your observation skill is awesome!Log in to reply

– Jihoon Kang · 2 years, 3 months ago

Thank you :)Log in to reply

1

Postscript: I was going to say that the folks that picked \(0\) like their coffee mocha, while those that picked \(1\) just want their coffee black. But, you're right, I read somewhere that when asked to pick a random number, \(37\) pops up much more frequently than expected, a fact that mind-trick magicians exploit. I picked \(137\) because that's the integer part of the reciprocal of the Fine Structure Constant. Does picking a famous constant at random qualify? I'm going to check and see how many of them are odd. – Michael Mendrin · 2 years, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

– Jihoon Kang · 2 years, 3 months ago

Haha :). I do not wish to get into the philosophy of the definition of 'random'. Although one short definition could include 'a choice without reason'. If an integer we chose truly was random, then there should have been absolutely no factors influencing our decision to chose it. Of course, that seems to be next to impossible.Log in to reply

– Michael Mendrin · 2 years, 3 months ago

It is a fact that humans suck at being random, even though they think it should be easy. Give anybody a marker pen and a whiteboard, and tell him/her to mark dots on the board at random. After it's "done", just about anybody can tell it isn't really random.Log in to reply

0 – Shani P · 2 years, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

1 – Cool Math · 2 years, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

1 – Calvin Lin Staff · 2 years, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

0 – Thushar Mn · 1 year, 8 months ago

Log in to reply

1 – Kunal Verma · 2 years, 2 months ago

Log in to reply

1 – Alexander Surin Staff · 2 years, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

0 – Kunal Joshi · 2 years, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

1 – Aryan Gaikwad · 2 years, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

0, I just randomly thought of 2 – Daniel Chen · 2 years, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

1 – Sahil Nare · 2 years, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

1 – Kislay Raj · 2 years, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

1 – Archit Boobna · 2 years, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

1 – Nikhil Ramakrishnan · 2 years, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

1 – Rajorshi Chaudhuri · 2 years, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

0 – Raghav Vaidyanathan · 2 years, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

1 – Harsh Shrivastava · 2 years, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

1 – Harshit Sharma · 2 years, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

1 – Sudeep Salgia · 2 years, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

0 – Kushal Patankar · 2 years, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

1 – Rishabh Tripathi · 2 years, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

1 – Josh Silverman Staff · 2 years, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

1 – Karan Siwach · 2 years, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

0 – Manish Bhargao · 2 years, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

1 – Thushar Mn · 2 years, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

1 – Pranshu Gaba · 2 years, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

1 – Anton Kriksunov Staff · 2 years, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

1 – Peter Taylor Staff · 2 years, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

0 – Kenji Ejima Staff · 2 years, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

1 – Kelly Tran Staff · 2 years, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

1 – Jim Ralphealo Mijares · 2 years, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

0 – Pranjal Jain · 2 years, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

0 – Brian Charlesworth · 2 years, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

1 – Sharky Kesa · 2 years, 3 months ago

Log in to reply