Waste less time on Facebook — follow Brilliant.

A Suggested Radical Change

Hey All Brilliantians,

I've used the Brilliant site for over a year now! A lot of things look great and the Brilliant staff has done a great job in pursuing their vision. Unfortunately, I think I've lost the motive to continue using this site a month after the radical change from "problem sets" to "problem feed". There were a few reasons for this.

One, there was too much choice. The fact that I can jump from one problem to the next is simply too overpowering an instinct rather than solving the problem at hand, especially if the problem at hand is too hard and the problem in sights is more appealing.

Two, there was too little choice. To rephrase, the enormous amount of choices I did have were either of low quality or were too scarcely dispersed amongst a barrage of bad problem choices. I often find myself scrolling miles down pages just to find problems that I like. In particular, a lot of algebra problems I see in my "Best of Algebra feed" have been greatly diluted, in that a lot of problems deal with statistics and "real-world" word problems that require little more creativity than expressing the given problem as a set of mathematical statements.

Three, there was no more incentive. (Note that this doesn't equate to the points.) I used to come to the site every day looking for that satisfaction from getting problems right. Amongst the set of 8-problem challenges, it was a great joy to get a problem right. Now, the feeling has been reduced to "eh, I solved this problem, I'll move on." The colorful green splash that pops up when I get a problem right does little to fix this. In particular, I feel lazy and don't type up solutions anymore, simply because there are so many problems out there to solve that are also worth writing solutions for, and to spend time on this problem would mean I should also spend time on the other problems to write a solution, and there's only so much time for that.

It's not that I don't enjoy the new system; it's that, somewhere inside me, I need to have that sense of "completion". Getting the majority of problems in a "difficult set" is far more rewarding, in my opinion, than getting a few problems amidst a torrent of mixed-difficulty problems.

I think the Brilliant staff can fix these problems (no pun intended) quite easily, so that the site appeals to both users like me as well as users that enjoy the current set up. I believe that the same old system of weekly problem sets can be reintroduced, but it can be done adjacently to the current system. I see that the staff have already developed preliminary systems to recommend problems to users. What if problem sets were a gateway to the current set up of the site? I have a plan proposal that caters this exact possibility.

At the beginning of each day, the Brilliant system can determine a set of two problems from each topic a user is subscribed to, with these problems being chosen from the existing database based on the problem's rating and the user's rating. Any problems that are read by the user are marked as completed, and they cannot appear in later problem sets until a very long time. The user can either choose to solve both problems, one of the problems, or none of the problems from each topic. Upon indication from the user that the user has finished his problem set for a topic in this way, the user can enter the problem feed for that particular topic, with options to post problems within that topic as well as site-wide, topic-wide notes.

As a concrete example to avoid ambiguity, John Smith gets two problems, one entitled "A" and one titled "B". John has not recently seen or has never seen problems "A" nor "B", and they're in algebra. They're suited to the level that John's rated to solve, and he can choose to solve either one, two, or no problems before entering the problem feed for algebra. Within this feed, John can publish site-wide notes and algebra problems.

What do you guys think, Brilliant community? Do you think that this system is a good or bad improvement to the current one, and why?

Note by Tanishq Aggarwal
2 years, 7 months ago

No vote yet
1 vote


Sort by:

Top Newest

Tanishq, thanks for this feedback. The staff have been giving this a great deal of thought, and it is always helpful to get thoughtful and articulate feedback from members. There are a lot of updates coming in the next few months. Stay tuned ... Suyeon Khim Staff · 2 years, 7 months ago

Log in to reply

@Suyeon Khim Are problem sets, in one or the other form, included in the upcoming changes? Dhruv Bhasin · 2 years, 7 months ago

Log in to reply

Wow! I have only been on Brilliant for a month, so I don't know anything about the old problem sets. I'd love to see them re-implemented, but I have grown very attached to the current system, so if they could coexist, I'd be happy. :D Finn Hulse · 2 years, 7 months ago

Log in to reply

@Finn Hulse Back in my day... :P

Yea, there first was 8 problems in a set, and if you got one wrong 3 times in a row you can't answer it anymore.

However, I feel that having a lot of problems at my fingertips is a lot better than just 8 problems; I feel more free to solve whatever I want. There was even a point in time when there was only 4 problems per set.

I think that if you really like to solve problems, you shouldn't need a motivation to start solving them. The purpose is to raise your problem solving skills, so I want to meet as many problems I haven't seen before and learn their tricks. That is my motivating force. Daniel Liu · 2 years, 7 months ago

Log in to reply

@Daniel Liu I like solving problems in big bursts sometimes, so I used to solve all of the problems in the set, but when streaks were implemented, I struggled to keep mine going because I had solved all of the problems. Now, with the feeds, I get new problems every day, and I can keep my streak going. Trevor B. · 2 years, 7 months ago

Log in to reply

@Trevor B. Yeah, that is one benefit. Finn Hulse · 2 years, 7 months ago

Log in to reply

@Daniel Liu I joined brilliant in the days when there were 4 problems per set Yan Yau Cheng · 2 years, 7 months ago

Log in to reply

@Yan Yau Cheng And you're only 13 years old... wow Milly Choochoo · 2 years, 7 months ago

Log in to reply

@Daniel Liu I love to solve problems. However, the sheer amount of choice gives me almost too much freedom to jump around. I suggested this as a way to give an organized set of problems to the user, and then allow them to enter the problem stream. At the same time, if the user wants to jump ahead right to the problem stream, he can do so without solving the problems. Additionally, another system possibility is to let users choose what they want to do: if they always want to use the current system or use the system that I described. Tanishq Aggarwal · 2 years, 7 months ago

Log in to reply

@Tanishq Aggarwal Yeah, I like the second idea. Finn Hulse · 2 years, 7 months ago

Log in to reply

@Daniel Liu Yay! Same here bro! Finn Hulse · 2 years, 7 months ago

Log in to reply

@Finn Hulse Haha, I know how you feel. Vishnuram Leonardodavinci · 2 years, 7 months ago

Log in to reply


Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...