You'll find something interesting if you take the golden ratio, \( \phi = \frac{1 + \sqrt{5}}{2} \), to high powers:

\[ \phi^6 = 17.944 \] \[ \phi^{10} = 122.992 \] \[ \phi^{15} = 1364.0007 \]

It seems as if large exponents of \(\phi\) come arbitrarily close to integer values. In fact, \(\phi\) isn't the only number which does this. For example, \( (2+ \sqrt{3})^{5} = 723.999 \). This is no coincidence.

These numbers - known as Pisot-Vijayaraghavan numbers - produce "almost-integers" when raised to high powers. I'll give a quick sketch of why this is, as well as an easy way to find other numbers with this property:

We can take a number \(q = a + \sqrt{b}\), where \(a\) and \(b\) are integers, and consider how it behaves under an operation called *Galois conjugation*. Essentially, this is just a more general version of what you may already know as complex conjugation. To find the Galois conjugate of \(q\), simply change the sign of the square root term: \(q* = a - \sqrt{b}\). This is equivalent to setting \(q\) to be the root of the polynomial \(x^2 - 2ax + a^2 - b = 0\) and finding the second root, or \(q*\).

A few properties of Galois conjugation can be easily deduced, and are already implicit in the quadratic equation above:

\[ q + q* = 2a \] \[ qq* = a^2 - b \] \[ q^2 + q*^2 = 2a^2 + 2b \] \[ q^n + q*^n = \sum \binom{n}{k} a^{n-2k}b^{2k} \]

The last equality is important here. Notice especially that these four equations all produce integers results on the righthand side. Now, whenever \( |q*| < 1 \), the second term of \( q^n + q*^n \) becomes arbitrarily small for increasing \(n\). This immediately implies that

\[ q^n + q*^n \approx q^n \approx \sum \binom{n}{k} a^{n-2k}b^{2k} \qquad n \gg 1 \]

Thus, any number \(q\) whose Galois conjugate satisfies \(|q*| < 1\) will produce near-integer values when raised to high powers. Here are some examples of such numbers:

\[ (2 + \sqrt{6})^7 = 34528.0037 \] \[ (4 + \sqrt{21})^9 = 252672968.008 \] \[ (1 + \sqrt{3})^{15} = 3526400.0093 \]

*It's worth noting that in the case that \(q\) has a denominator of \(t\), as is the case with \( \phi\) where \(t=2\), then we also need the further restriction that \(t^2 | qq*\), or that \(a^2 -b\) is divisible by \(t^2\) so that \(qq*\) remains an integer.

No vote yet

1 vote

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...

Easy Math Editor

`*italics*`

or`_italics_`

italics`**bold**`

or`__bold__`

boldNote: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctlyparagraph 1

paragraph 2

`[example link](https://brilliant.org)`

`> This is a quote`

Remember to wrap math in \( ... \) or \[ ... \] to ensure proper formatting.`2 \times 3`

`2^{34}`

`a_{i-1}`

`\frac{2}{3}`

`\sqrt{2}`

`\sum_{i=1}^3`

`\sin \theta`

`\boxed{123}`

## Comments

Sort by:

TopNewest@Levi Adam Walker Yes, this is amazing right???!! I got to know about these numbers quite recently I must confess........But, check out "Heegner Number "...........Wikipedia has a page on it too...........when it comes to "Close" approximations, I prefer to quote them........:)

Log in to reply

Yeah, they're much cooler, but also much harder to explain :p

Log in to reply

Does this also work with cuberoots? I suppose \( q* \) has to be defined differently, right?

Log in to reply

It won't generally work with this construction, since \(q^n + q*^n\) must give an integer and cube roots tend to act erratically when raised to arbitrary powers.

Log in to reply

Ah, right. Thanks!

Log in to reply

The drug molecule bearing an active hydrogen atom (-COOH, -OH, -NH2 etc.) can be converted to an ester with the hydroxyl moiety of the lipid, resulting in an amphiphilic complex that aids membrane, tissue, or cell wall transfer.

https://www.creative-biostructure.com/Pharmacosomes-Production-615.htm

Log in to reply

\[e^{pie\sqrt{162}}\]

Log in to reply

Ion channels provide a high conducting, hydrophilic pathway across the hydrophobic interior of the membrane.

https://www.creative-biogene.com/products/ion-channel-stable-cell-lines.html

Log in to reply