An experiment

Hello, I just thought of comparing the speeds of two methods to double a number in python but didn't got a precise result. Can anyone help me improving this testing?


Here's the program:

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
import time,random
mainscores=[[],[]]
for digits in range(15):
    print('Calculations with %s digit numbers are going on...' %(digits+1))
    scoreplus=0
    scoremultiply=0
    for m in range(100):
        timebyaplusa=0
        timebyatimestwo=0
        while timebyaplusa==timebyatimestwo:
            a=random.randint((10**digits),(10**(digits+1))-1)
            starttime=time.time()
            b1=a+a
            timebyaplusa+=time.time()-starttime
            starttime=time.time()
            b2=a*2
            timebyatimestwo+=time.time()-starttime
            if b1!=b2:
                print('Error')
        if timebyaplusa>timebyatimestwo:
            scoremultiply+=1
        else:
            scoreplus+=1
    mainscores[0].append(scoreplus)
    mainscores[1].append(scoremultiply)

...and here's the output:

Will it even show any difference?

Note by Pranjal Jain
4 years, 7 months ago

No vote yet
1 vote

  Easy Math Editor

This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.

When posting on Brilliant:

  • Use the emojis to react to an explanation, whether you're congratulating a job well done , or just really confused .
  • Ask specific questions about the challenge or the steps in somebody's explanation. Well-posed questions can add a lot to the discussion, but posting "I don't understand!" doesn't help anyone.
  • Try to contribute something new to the discussion, whether it is an extension, generalization or other idea related to the challenge.
  • Stay on topic — we're all here to learn more about math and science, not to hear about your favorite get-rich-quick scheme or current world events.

MarkdownAppears as
*italics* or _italics_ italics
**bold** or __bold__ bold

- bulleted
- list

  • bulleted
  • list

1. numbered
2. list

  1. numbered
  2. list
Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly
paragraph 1

paragraph 2

paragraph 1

paragraph 2

[example link](https://brilliant.org)example link
> This is a quote
This is a quote
    # I indented these lines
    # 4 spaces, and now they show
    # up as a code block.

    print "hello world"
# I indented these lines
# 4 spaces, and now they show
# up as a code block.

print "hello world"
MathAppears as
Remember to wrap math in \( ... \) or \[ ... \] to ensure proper formatting.
2 \times 3 2×3 2 \times 3
2^{34} 234 2^{34}
a_{i-1} ai1 a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3} 23 \frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2} 2 \sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3 i=13 \sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta sinθ \sin \theta
\boxed{123} 123 \boxed{123}

Comments

Sort by:

Top Newest

Don't know anything about Python, but my guess is that only 1 trial per an n n digit number won't tell you much, since both methods have comparable times and the random factors obfuscate any differences in the short term.

If you want to see a difference, try more trials (1000?) and average them out instead of just one trial.

Siddhartha Srivastava - 4 years, 7 months ago

Log in to reply

Good idea! Let me try that out.

Pranjal Jain - 4 years, 7 months ago

Log in to reply

Well, for 10k calculations, for nn digit numbers, n{1,2,3,,20}n\in \{1,2,3,\cdots,20\}, the results were as follows:

while with 1m calculations, the results were:

Seems like '+' wins in case of bigger numbers.

Pranjal Jain - 4 years, 7 months ago

Log in to reply

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...