Suppose we construct a die in the shape of a cuboctahedron:

Anyone have any idea how to calculate the theoretical probability that when we roll it, it will land on a triangle as opposed to a square?

Image credit: http://www.korthalsaltes.com/

Suppose we construct a die in the shape of a cuboctahedron:

Anyone have any idea how to calculate the theoretical probability that when we roll it, it will land on a triangle as opposed to a square?

Image credit: http://www.korthalsaltes.com/

No vote yet

1 vote

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...

## Comments

Sort by:

TopNewestIf it were just a function of relative surface area then the probability that it would land on a square face would be \(\dfrac{3 - \sqrt{3}}{2} \approx 0.634\), but this of course does not take into account the mechanics of actually rolling a cuboctahedron. The square sides offer a more stable base so it would take more angular momentum to roll from this state onto a triangle, but as the square has one extra side there would be more directions in which to roll. A precise calculation would appear unlikely, so I would probably just go ahead and roll it 100 times and see how it compares to the \(0.634\) value. (I don't have such a solid to experiment with but if I were to make a guess, I would anticipate a square probability of in excess of \(0.75\).) – Brian Charlesworth · 6 months, 2 weeks ago

Log in to reply

I've wondered if it is sufficient to project the edges onto a sphere, and then take the "sector surface area" as the relative probabilities (scale to a sum of 1). In a sense, I feel that accounts for 1) Landing on a vertex and spinning, 2) Landing on an edge, 3) Landing on a face.

(Though, this doesn't change the "actual surface area relative probabilities" by much) – Calvin Lin Staff · 6 months, 2 weeks ago

Log in to reply

– Geoff Pilling · 6 months, 2 weeks ago

Next time I get my hands on a cuboctahedron, I'll definitely give it a go! (At least find the experimental value)Log in to reply

Depends on the thing's mass, bouncy-ness, angular momentum, and momentum. You can say the momentums are random within a certain range, but mass and bouncyness are still variables. Are you asking us to calculate it in terms of mass and bouncyness? – Ez Money · 2 months ago

Log in to reply