\[-1\quad =\quad -1\\ \frac { 1 }{ -1 } \quad =\quad \frac { -1 }{ 1 }\] Taking square root both sides \[ \frac { \sqrt { 1 } }{ \sqrt { -1 } } \quad =\quad \frac { \sqrt { -1 } }{ \sqrt { 1 } }\] Cross multiplying both sides

\[ 1\quad =\quad { i }^{ 2 }\\ 1\quad =\quad -1\]

Where lies the Maths fallacy?

This puzzle is taken from a Maths book I read many years ago. I can't remember the name.

## Comments

Sort by:

TopNewest\(\sqrt{\frac{a}{b}}=\frac{\sqrt{a}}{\sqrt{b}}\) is true only when \(a\) and \(b\) have the same signs.

EDIT: I meant to say whenever \(a\) is positive and \(b\) is negative.

Log in to reply

I am replying after a long time. I was roaming in the garden and realised some funny thing happening here. \[\sqrt{\frac{-2}{3}} = \frac{\sqrt{-2}}{3}\] So the expression \(\frac{\sqrt{a}}{\sqrt{b}} = \frac{\sqrt{a}}{\sqrt{b}}\) is only

invalidif \( b < 0\) and \(a > 0\).Let's see the big picture now. You disproved the prove above in the post by claiming that the expression \(\sqrt{\frac{a}{b}} = \frac{\sqrt{a}}{\sqrt{b}}\) is only

invalidif \( b < 0\) and \(a > 0\). You actually said something else but I have reduced what you have said to this form because there was certain inaccuracies that I have talked about in the beginning.Now the problem is that your statement needs to be proved in order to disapprove my given trick that \(1 = -1\) and the proof of your statement in the end is the assumption that my trick uses some wrong methods.

If you are not able to understand then try the following example and you will understand what I mean:

The challenged is reopened!

Log in to reply

(sigh) Here I go again...

No, my statement doesn't have to be proved. My statement makes the math

consistent. You can claim that my statement is not true and continue doing inconsistent math. But what good would that do?The point of posts like these is: "Hey, look! I'm doing seemingly correct mathematical operations and coming up with a crazy conclusion! Can you find what I'm doing wrong?"

Guess what? These 'crazy conclusions' make math inconsistent and no one wants that.

The

correctway of looking at this is, \(1=-1\) is wrong, so what I'm doing in between must be wrong. Not the other way around.Log in to reply

Here's the point my friend. The reason I am compelling you to prove your statement is to make sure that there isn't any other fallacy because of which the result 1 = -1 is inconsistent. OR you have to prove that the fallacy doesn't lie in any other step.

Log in to reply

It is very interesting to note that \(\sqrt{ab} = \sqrt{a} \times \sqrt{b}\) is true even if at least one of them is positive while \(\sqrt{a/b} = \sqrt{a}/\sqrt{b}\) is not.

Log in to reply

Not that interesting if you know why that happens. The whole thing is because of the fact that \(\frac{1}{\sqrt{-1}}=-\sqrt{-1}\).

Log in to reply

Log in to reply

\(\sqrt{a/b} = \sqrt{a}/\sqrt{b}\) is true also if both a and b are negative integers

Log in to reply

It is in taking the roots. What the guy did was actually take the fourth root of 1 which is +i or - i (equal to the square roots you have taken of -1) and then equated them. That's where the catch lies! Good one tho...

Log in to reply

The identity root a *root b =root ab is not applicable for complex no.s

Log in to reply

It would be in the 3rd step.

Log in to reply