I stumbled upon this awesome proof just now. Can you figure out what the fallacy is? (Brilliant users are brilliant, so I expect this to get solved quickly Lol)

This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science
related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should
explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments
should further the discussion of math and science.

When posting on Brilliant:

Use the emojis to react to an explanation, whether you're congratulating a job well done , or just really confused .

Ask specific questions about the challenge or the steps in somebody's explanation. Well-posed questions can add a lot to the discussion, but posting "I don't understand!" doesn't help anyone.

Try to contribute something new to the discussion, whether it is an extension, generalization or other idea related to the challenge.

Stay on topic — we're all here to learn more about math and science, not to hear about your favorite get-rich-quick scheme or current world events.

Markdown

Appears as

*italics* or _italics_

italics

**bold** or __bold__

bold

- bulleted - list

bulleted

list

1. numbered 2. list

numbered

list

Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly

You really don't have to go through all the lines to know what went wrong. A hint for those who are struggling: if $x^2=y^2$, does it necessarily mean that $x=y$?

Actually in second last step when you proved n+1 = n and then cut off 'n' from both sides and reported 1=0 is actually wrong.
Since in the former equation 'n' is the variable and if the highest power of the variable is eliminated from LHS and RHS like the one above then one root of the variable (i.e. 'n' here) tends to infinity...
Hence if 'n' tends to infinity

n+1 can very well be estimated to n..

This is what I think
Nevertheless let's wait for others to reply...
To see if I'm right or not

When he takes the square root he simply puts the radicand even though it's negative, as n-(2n+1)/2=n-n-1/2<0; it'easy to check that using the modulo of the radicand the equation would be correct.

Ohh!!!!
Ur right
How on earth did I miss that!!!
Anyways thanks...

But what I said isn't wrong actually
Since if you see the second last equation
He wrote n+1=n and in next step concluded that 1=0.
Whereas in equation like that 'n' clearly tends to infinity..

Easy Math Editor

This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.

When posting on Brilliant:

`*italics*`

or`_italics_`

italics`**bold**`

or`__bold__`

boldNote: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctlyparagraph 1

paragraph 2

`[example link](https://brilliant.org)`

`> This is a quote`

Remember to wrap math in`\(`

...`\)`

or`\[`

...`\]`

to ensure proper formatting.`2 \times 3`

`2^{34}`

`a_{i-1}`

`\frac{2}{3}`

`\sqrt{2}`

`\sum_{i=1}^3`

`\sin \theta`

`\boxed{123}`

## Comments

Sort by:

TopNewestYou really don't have to go through all the lines to know what went wrong. A hint for those who are struggling: if $x^2=y^2$, does it necessarily mean that $x=y$?

Log in to reply

I agree, $x^{2}=y^{2}$ doesn't mean these two variables are equal

Log in to reply

Exactly. When you use even roots, you have to put $\pm$ in front of the expression. :D

Log in to reply

Log in to reply

You cannot take positive square root on both the sides. Because if x^2 = y^2, it is not necessary that x=y only, it means x may be -y also.

Log in to reply

While taking square root there are two solutions a=b,a=-b for a^2=b^2 a=b isn't always true. in the case a+b=0 it is not necessary that a=b

Log in to reply

There seems to be a typo in the 4th line though. It does not affect the final result if changed accordingly.

Log in to reply

Actually in second last step when you proved n+1 = n and then cut off 'n' from both sides and reported 1=0 is actually wrong. Since in the former equation 'n' is the variable and if the highest power of the variable is eliminated from LHS and RHS like the one above then one root of the variable (i.e. 'n' here) tends to infinity... Hence if 'n' tends to infinity

n+1 can very well be estimated to n..

This is what I think Nevertheless let's wait for others to reply... To see if I'm right or not

Log in to reply

When he takes the square root he simply puts the radicand even though it's negative, as n-(2n+1)/2=n-n-1/2<0; it'easy to check that using the modulo of the radicand the equation would be correct.

Log in to reply

Ohh!!!! Ur right How on earth did I miss that!!! Anyways thanks...

But what I said isn't wrong actually Since if you see the second last equation He wrote n+1=n and in next step concluded that 1=0. Whereas in equation like that 'n' clearly tends to infinity..

Log in to reply

Log in to reply

a clear blunder starts from the 4rth step... and agree that two variables are actually equal , thus they variables ,i.e not constant.

Log in to reply