1. the total length of these subintervals is strictly less than 1.

2. For each rational number \( r \in [0,1] \), there exists a \(j\) such that \( r \in I_j \).

No vote yet

1 vote

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...

Easy Math Editor

`*italics*`

or`_italics_`

italics`**bold**`

or`__bold__`

boldNote: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctlyparagraph 1

paragraph 2

`[example link](https://brilliant.org)`

`> This is a quote`

Remember to wrap math in \( ... \) or \[ ... \] to ensure proper formatting.`2 \times 3`

`2^{34}`

`a_{i-1}`

`\frac{2}{3}`

`\sqrt{2}`

`\sum_{i=1}^3`

`\sin \theta`

`\boxed{123}`

## Comments

Sort by:

TopNewestWe can write the set of rational numbers in \([0,1]\) as \(\{m/n : 0\leq m \leq n, n \geq 1\}\). Now exclude the point \(1\) from all these sets and enclose each rational point with denominator \(n\) by a sub interval of length \(3^{-n}\), lying completely in \([0,1]\) (e.g. enclose the point \(m/n\) by the sub-interval \([m/n, m/n + 3^{-n}]\)). The total length of all these sub-intervals is \(\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} n3^{-n}=\frac{3}{4}\). Finally enclose the point \(1\) by the sub-interval \([9/10,1]\). Hence all rational points are enclosed and total length of the sub-intervals = \(3/4+1/10 <1\).

Log in to reply

Quick note that the total length is less than \(17/20\) because of overlapping intervals.

Log in to reply

This was really good.

Log in to reply

Indeed, the rationals are measure-zero and countable (despite being dense in \(\mathbb{R}\)); they are a null set. The total length of the required subintervals can be any \(\epsilon > 0\).

Log in to reply

That does not prove existence of sub intervals of the required properties.

Log in to reply

The proof of my initial statement eludes me. A proof that the total length is less than \(\epsilon\) for any \(\epsilon>0\) is much easier (order the rationals and construct intervals around them with lengths of the terms of a converging infinite geometric series of your choice).

If anyone is able to prove my original statement (especially constructively), by all means, post it here. The "overlaps" of the intervals are bugging me quite a bit.

Log in to reply

0.999999999999999.................................=1

Log in to reply

Comment deleted Aug 15, 2014

Log in to reply

Hey, it isn't good to self-advertise your problems on completely unrelated notes.

Log in to reply