Waste less time on Facebook — follow Brilliant.
×

Can you make new generallization of this theorem for future mathematics

Fermat Last Theorem

Note by Budi Utomo
10 months, 2 weeks ago

No vote yet
1 vote

Comments

Sort by:

Top Newest

Please note that Fermat's last theorem was originated from Pythagoras Theorem, where he (Fermat), must had known a very basic and simple trick which is too elementary to prove, what is the trick?,

"A primitive Pythagoras triplets (in co prime integers), are impossible with two sides of a right angle triangle being as powerful numbers"

Powerful number : is an integer which has all of its prime factors exponent are greater than one Bassam Karzeddin · 6 months ago

Log in to reply

We may generalize the exponent to be a real positive algebraic number say (g), the generalization would be as this:

                                                  X^g + Y^g = Z^g

have no solution in distinct positive coprime integers, (X < Y < Z), where (g) is greater than two

This has a specific history that was older than accepted proof of FLT Bassam Karzeddin · 9 months, 3 weeks ago

Log in to reply

I don't know how to generalize Fermat's Last Theorem, but I can give you a link. This paper is Andrew Wiles' original paper on his proof of Fermat's Last Theorem. It is called "Modular elliptic curves and Fermat's Last Theorem". Ananth Jayadev · 10 months, 2 weeks ago

Log in to reply

This link is very useful in this regard: http://hsm.stackexchange.com/questions/3257/sum-of-like-powers-in-real-numbers Bassam Karzeddin · 6 months ago

Log in to reply

@Bassam Karzeddin Editt: I mean "A primitive Pythagoras triplets (in co prime integers), are impossible with all sides of a right angle triangle being as powerful numbers", or "A primitive Pythagoras triplets (in co prime integers), are impossible with two sides of a right angle triangle being as powerful numbers of this form (x^n, y^m, z), where (n, m) are positive integers > 1, and (x, y, z) are positive integers" Bassam Karzeddin · 3 months, 2 weeks ago

Log in to reply

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...