# Can you make new generallization of this theorem for future mathematics

Fermat Last Theorem

Note by Budi Utomo
2 years, 5 months ago

MarkdownAppears as
*italics* or _italics_ italics
**bold** or __bold__ bold
- bulleted- list
• bulleted
• list
1. numbered2. list
1. numbered
2. list
Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly
paragraph 1paragraph 2

paragraph 1

paragraph 2

[example link](https://brilliant.org)example link
> This is a quote
This is a quote
    # I indented these lines
# 4 spaces, and now they show
# up as a code block.

print "hello world"
# I indented these lines
# 4 spaces, and now they show
# up as a code block.

print "hello world"
MathAppears as
Remember to wrap math in $$...$$ or $...$ to ensure proper formatting.
2 \times 3 $$2 \times 3$$
2^{34} $$2^{34}$$
a_{i-1} $$a_{i-1}$$
\frac{2}{3} $$\frac{2}{3}$$
\sqrt{2} $$\sqrt{2}$$
\sum_{i=1}^3 $$\sum_{i=1}^3$$
\sin \theta $$\sin \theta$$
\boxed{123} $$\boxed{123}$$

Sort by:

This link is very useful in this regard: http://hsm.stackexchange.com/questions/3257/sum-of-like-powers-in-real-numbers

- 2 years ago

Editt: I mean "A primitive Pythagoras triplets (in co prime integers), are impossible with all sides of a right angle triangle being as powerful numbers", or "A primitive Pythagoras triplets (in co prime integers), are impossible with two sides of a right angle triangle being as powerful numbers of this form (x^n, y^m, z), where (n, m) are positive integers > 1, and (x, y, z) are positive integers"

- 1 year, 10 months ago

Please note that Fermat's last theorem was originated from Pythagoras Theorem, where he (Fermat), must had known a very basic and simple trick which is too elementary to prove, what is the trick?,

"A primitive Pythagoras triplets (in co prime integers), are impossible with two sides of a right angle triangle being as powerful numbers"

Powerful number : is an integer which has all of its prime factors exponent are greater than one

- 2 years ago

We may generalize the exponent to be a real positive algebraic number say (g), the generalization would be as this:

                                                  X^g + Y^g = Z^g


have no solution in distinct positive coprime integers, (X < Y < Z), where (g) is greater than two

This has a specific history that was older than accepted proof of FLT

- 2 years, 4 months ago

I don't know how to generalize Fermat's Last Theorem, but I can give you a link. This paper is Andrew Wiles' original paper on his proof of Fermat's Last Theorem. It is called "Modular elliptic curves and Fermat's Last Theorem".

- 2 years, 5 months ago