Let \(a_{1}, a_{2}, a_{3},....a_{n}\) and \(b_{1} , b_{2}, b_{3},...b_{n}\) be two arithmetic progressions.

Then prove that the points : \( (a_{1},b_{1} ),(a_{2},b_{2}),.......,(a_{n},b_{n}) \) are collinear.

Let \(a_{1}, a_{2}, a_{3},....a_{n}\) and \(b_{1} , b_{2}, b_{3},...b_{n}\) be two arithmetic progressions.

Then prove that the points : \( (a_{1},b_{1} ),(a_{2},b_{2}),.......,(a_{n},b_{n}) \) are collinear.

No vote yet

6 votes

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...

## Comments

Sort by:

TopNewestWe will now show that any 3 points are collinear.

Thus, we have to show \((a_k, b_k)\), \((a_m, b_m)\) and \((a_n, b_n)\) are collinear.

\(\iff\) Line formed by \((a_k, b_k)\) and \((a_m, b_m)\) is parallel to line formed by \((a_m, b_m)\) and \((a_n, b_n)\)

Using the fact of arithmetic progressions, we can let \(a_k=a_0+k \times d_a\) and \(b_k=b_0+k \times d_b\), for some constants \(a_0, d_a, b_0, d_b\)

Therefore we can show that the gradients of the 2 lines are equal.

Gradient of line formed by \((a_k, b_k)\) and \((a_m, b_m)=\frac{b_m-b_k}{a_m-a_k}=\frac{d_b}{d_a}\)

Gradient of line formed by \((a_m, b_m)\) and \((a_n, b_n)=\frac{b_m-b_n}{a_m-a_n}=\frac{d_b}{d_a}\)

Since gradients are equal, it follows that the lines are parallel and thus \((a_k, b_k)\), \((a_m, b_m)\) and \((a_n, b_n)\) are collinear.

Now we can start with base case n=3 and induct by taking points \((a_1, b_1), (a_2, b_2)\) and \((a_{n+1}, b_{n+1})\). Hence proven.

Log in to reply

I will corroborate your solution there.

Log in to reply

Let \(a_i = \lambda_a i+\mu_a\), \(b_i = \lambda_b i+\mu_b\) for some real numbers \(\lambda_a,\lambda_b,\mu_a,\mu_b\).

Then \(i=\frac{a_i-\mu_a}{\lambda_a}\), and thus \(b_i = \lambda_b\frac{a_i-\mu_a}{\lambda_a}+\mu_b = \frac{\lambda_b}{\lambda_a}a_i+(\mu_b-\frac{\mu_a\lambda_b}{\lambda_a})\).

Hence all the points \((a_i,b_i)\) lie on the same line \(y=\frac{\lambda_b}{\lambda_a}x+(\mu_b-\frac{\mu_a\lambda_b}{\lambda_a})\), as desired.

Log in to reply

there's a easy method using determinant criteria, for 3 points prove that the determinant of area equal to 0

Log in to reply

This method is far more convenient in exams, since it would take much less time. Determinant method is always applicable to show collinearity.

Log in to reply

This prob came in C.M.I....................... Do you know how to prove that f(x)=1/(x+2cos(x)) is onto rigorously...I mean intuitively it can be seen, but is there any othere way to do it.............I mean using 'hardcore math'.

Log in to reply

There exists \(f(x)\) whenever \(x+2cosx \neq=0\). But I don't know how can we conclude that \(x\) will never be \(=-2cosx\) for all \(x\).

Log in to reply

at x=-1........-x/2 and cos(x) are same.............so Domain,I guess, is R-{-1}......

Log in to reply

Comment deleted May 21, 2013

Log in to reply

Log in to reply

Log in to reply

Log in to reply

Log in to reply

Log in to reply

hey,you gave isi bmath exam,right...?

Log in to reply

Nope friend, B.Stat............what about you?

Log in to reply