# Complex Exponentiation is Complex

Let's say we want to evaluate

$\frac{ (-1) ^ {-i} } { i ^ i } = ( a \sqrt{a} ) ^ \pi.$

What are wrong with the following methods?

3rd Method:

Raise both sides to the power of 4

$\large \frac { ((-1)^4)^{-i}}{(i^4)^i} = a^{6\pi}$, then $\frac {1^{-i}}{1^i} = 1 = a^{6\pi}$

With that, we have $a = 1$

4th method:

Raise both sides to the power of 3

$\large \frac { ((-1)^3)^{-i}}{(i^3)^{i}} = \frac {((-1)^{-1})^{i}} {(-i)^i } = \frac {(-1)^i}{(-i)^i} = \left ( \frac 1i \right )^i = (-i)^i = a^{9\pi /2}$

$(-i)^{-i} = a^{-9\pi /2}$ or $e^{-\pi /2} = a^{-9\pi /2}$, then $a = e^{1/9}$.

5th Method:

Raise both sides to the power of 5

$\large \frac { ((-1)^5)^{-i}}{(i^5)^i} = a^{15\pi /2}$

$\large \frac {(-1)^{-i}}{i^i} = \left ( \frac {-1}{i} \right )^i = i^i = e^{-\pi /2} = a^{15\pi /2}$

$a = e^{-1/15}$.

6th Method:

Take square root to both sides of the equation, with numerator of fraction becomes $(-1)^{-i/2} = ( \sqrt{-1} )^{-i} = i^{-i}$

$\large \frac {i^{-i} }{i^{i/2}} = a^{3\pi /4}$

$i^{-3\pi /2} = a^{3\pi /4}$

$i^{-1} = a^{1/2}$

$-i = a^{1/2}$

$a = (-i)^2 = -1$.

7th Method:

Knowing that $i^2 = -1$, we could have $(-1)^{-i} = i^{-i/2}$

$\large \frac { i^{-i/2} }{ i^i} = i^{-3i/2} = a^{3\pi /2}$

$i^{-i} = a^\pi, i^i = a^{-\pi}, e^{-\pi /2} = a^{-\pi}$

$a = e^2$.

8th Method:

Knowing that $i^2 = -1$, we could have $i^i = (-1)^{i/2}$

$\large \frac {(-1)^{-i} }{(-1)^{i/2}} = (-1)^{-3i/2} = a^{3\pi /2}$

$(-1)^{i} = a^{\pi}$

$(e^{i \pi} )^{i} = a^\pi$

$a = e^{i^2} = e^{-1}$.

9th Method:

Like the 8th Method

$(-1)^{i} = a^{\pi}$

$i^{i/2} = a^{\pi}$

$i^i = a^{2 \pi}$

$e^{-\pi /2} = a^{2 \pi}$

$a = e^{-1/4}$.

Original problem. See the first 2 methods there. Note by Calvin Lin
6 years, 3 months ago

This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.

When posting on Brilliant:

• Use the emojis to react to an explanation, whether you're congratulating a job well done , or just really confused .
• Ask specific questions about the challenge or the steps in somebody's explanation. Well-posed questions can add a lot to the discussion, but posting "I don't understand!" doesn't help anyone.
• Try to contribute something new to the discussion, whether it is an extension, generalization or other idea related to the challenge.

MarkdownAppears as
*italics* or _italics_ italics
**bold** or __bold__ bold
- bulleted- list
• bulleted
• list
1. numbered2. list
1. numbered
2. list
Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly
paragraph 1paragraph 2

paragraph 1

paragraph 2

[example link](https://brilliant.org)example link
> This is a quote
This is a quote
    # I indented these lines
# 4 spaces, and now they show
# up as a code block.

print "hello world"
# I indented these lines
# 4 spaces, and now they show
# up as a code block.

print "hello world"
MathAppears as
Remember to wrap math in $$ ... $$ or $ ... $ to ensure proper formatting.
2 \times 3 $2 \times 3$
2^{34} $2^{34}$
a_{i-1} $a_{i-1}$
\frac{2}{3} $\frac{2}{3}$
\sqrt{2} $\sqrt{2}$
\sum_{i=1}^3 $\sum_{i=1}^3$
\sin \theta $\sin \theta$
\boxed{123} $\boxed{123}$

Sort by:

$(e^{i\pi})^i=a^{-\pi}$

$\Rightarrow a=e$

But:

$(e^{i\pi})^i=(e^{3i\pi})^i=a^{-\pi}$

$\Rightarrow a=e^{3}$

$\Rightarrow e=e^{3}$ - 6 years, 3 months ago

All of the examples involve complex exponentiation of negative numbers, or, in the general case, complex exponentiation of complex numbers, which can have an infinity of values instead of an unique one. Consequently, we can't rely on ordinary identities and algebraic properties of exponentiation, as for example

${ \left( { a }^{ b } \right) }^{ c }={ { \left( { a }^{ c } \right) } }^{ b }$

is not true if $a=-1$, $b=3$, $c=i$.

Is there a "correct" answer to this? Outside of convention, no. This infinitude of values is an inherent property of complex exponentiation of complex numbers. So, special care has to be taken to avoid running into a multitude of "fallacies" as given above.

- 6 years, 3 months ago

Sir, in the method 3, you can't just raise any power to 2m. for eg. x^2=(-x)^2. You will be including roots of both positive and negative functions. I hope I am right. If wrong please do correct me.

- 6 years, 3 months ago

In method 6,you have made calculation mistake in step 3

- 6 years ago