While playing around on Geogebra, I found a curious theorem:

For all triangles \(\triangle ABC\), draw the circles with diameter as each of its sides. Call the circle passing through points \(A\) and \(B\) circle \(O_C\), and ditto for the other two circles. This theorem states that circles \(O_A\), \(O_B\), and line \(AB\) are concurrent, and ditto for the other two cases.

Your challenge: prove this theorem! Also, what is the significance of the concurrency points \(X,Y,Z\)? Is there a simpler way to define these points?

If this is actually a real theorem, please point me to the name of it.

No vote yet

1 vote

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...

Easy Math Editor

`*italics*`

or`_italics_`

italics`**bold**`

or`__bold__`

boldNote: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctlyparagraph 1

paragraph 2

`[example link](https://brilliant.org)`

`> This is a quote`

Remember to wrap math in \( ... \) or \[ ... \] to ensure proper formatting.`2 \times 3`

`2^{34}`

`a_{i-1}`

`\frac{2}{3}`

`\sqrt{2}`

`\sum_{i=1}^3`

`\sin \theta`

`\boxed{123}`

## Comments

Sort by:

TopNewestNotice \(\angle AXC = 90\) due to \(AB\) being the diameter. Similarly \(\angle CXB = 90\), so \(\angle AXB = 180\) meaning \(X\) is on \(AB\). Similarly \(Y, Z\) are on \(CA, BC\).

The altitudes result in \(AX, BY, CZ\) being the altitudes of \(\triangle ABC\), concurring at the orthocenter and forming the orthic triangle of \(ABC\) (as a result, \(A, B, C\)are the excenters of \(\triangle XYZ\))

Log in to reply

Hint : Restate the theorem a bit, Let the circle \(O_A\) and the line-segment \(AC\) meet at point \(P\). Join point \(P\) to the midpoint of line-segment \(AB\) (call it \(D\)) . We need to prove that \(DP=AD=\frac{c}{2}\). The trigonometric formula \(b=a\cos C + c\cos A\) will be useful.

Log in to reply

There may be a more elegant solution.

Log in to reply

Indeed there is ! Note that the \(\angle APB\) is a right angle. Hence \(PD=\frac{1}{2}BC\).

Log in to reply