The Continuum Hypothesis claims that

There is no set whose cardinality is strictly between that of integers and real numbers.

I went out on an adventure checking what people think about it.

Large version here

Large version here

Large version here

Large version here

No vote yet

1 vote

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...

Easy Math Editor

`*italics*`

or`_italics_`

italics`**bold**`

or`__bold__`

boldNote: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctlyparagraph 1

paragraph 2

`[example link](https://brilliant.org)`

`> This is a quote`

Remember to wrap math in \( ... \) or \[ ... \] to ensure proper formatting.`2 \times 3`

`2^{34}`

`a_{i-1}`

`\frac{2}{3}`

`\sqrt{2}`

`\sum_{i=1}^3`

`\sin \theta`

`\boxed{123}`

## Comments

Sort by:

TopNewest@John Muradeli : What do you think about this?

Log in to reply

LOOL AGNISHOM THIS @$*! IS HILLARIOUS!! I just read the whole thing - and I thought I was the only one going crazy in customer support chatrooms xDD

lolz I have no idea as far as the answer to that question goes, but great job trolling those cyborg representatives! cyborg cause if you look how similar their responses are, you'll see they mostly follow a script - or, a program ;)

Now if I knew what the heck a cardinal is, I might have a better idea. But I'll tell you one thing:

If a solution to that problem exists, I don't have an answer. If a solution to that problem doesn't exist, I have the answer.

Log in to reply

Well, this problem is called Continuum Hypothesis. You may look it up on wikipedia.

Cardinality of a set is loosely defined as the number of elements in that set. E.g, Cardinality({Calvin, Sue, Pete, Arron})=4

The cardinality of the set of real numbers is higher than the set of natural numbers, as you might notice, even though they are both infinite.

The question is if there is any set whose cardinality is between these two.

Well, if you have any chatroom transcripts, please share them.

Log in to reply

The complex integer set? Integers with complex interger combos.

The whole number set? Includes zero.

The rational number set? Real minus irrational.

The irrational number set? Real minus rational.

Log in to reply

We say that two sets are of the same cardinality if there is a bijection, i.e, an way to associate all elements of one set with all elements of the other.

For example, {Red, Green Blue} and {A,B,C} are of the same cardinality because we may establish a bijection like this:

A -> Green, B -> Blue, C -> Red

That is why we can say that the number of elements in set 1 = number of elements in set 2 or their cardinalities are equal.

It can be shown that there are as many integers as rational numbers or natural numbers by establishing a bijection between them.

Log in to reply

I've seen on YouTube though how the number of real numbers between 0 and 1 is greater than the number of Natural numbers due to some weird property that lets you invent more numbers than natural ones allow or some weird stuff like that...

But alright what about, at least, complex integer set? It's like complex natural numbers and their negative counterparts (and zero!). Can you "show" that too?

Anyway, I hold the answer to your question, like I said. If a condition applies...

Log in to reply

Post 7 in this thread

Log in to reply

Sorry :p

Log in to reply

Check that link

Log in to reply

Hm. Looks interesting. I'll add it to my

Importantlist for the next week (got hw from 7AP classes as of now).Thanks!

Log in to reply

Hahaha... LOL

Log in to reply

Comment deleted Oct 26, 2014

Log in to reply

reference

Mandatory xkcdLog in to reply

Log in to reply

Log in to reply

Dude, this made my day, I read this when just woke up and I believe that this was the first time I didn't sleep through a morning chem lecture.

Log in to reply

Glad that you like it

Log in to reply

WOW!!! Troll of the millennium, I wish I were there in place of those ppl you trrolled, wanna find how it feels to be trolled, @Agnishom Chattopadhyay

Log in to reply

@Agnishom Chattopadhyay , it appears that you've made a typo in the statement of the continuum hypothesis.

Log in to reply

Yup, fixed it. Thanks :)

Log in to reply

Have u really chatted with them? @Agnishom Chattopadhyay

Log in to reply

Yes. Please don't let them know it was me

Log in to reply

Why u did that??any purpose in mind??

Log in to reply

Log in to reply

Thank you for helping me with the code, Agnishom :)

Log in to reply

Mention not

Log in to reply