Waste less time on Facebook — follow Brilliant.
×

Continuum Hypothesis - What Amazon, Samsung, Boost and the Common Man thinks about it

The Continuum Hypothesis claims that

There is no set whose cardinality is strictly between that of integers and real numbers.

I went out on an adventure checking what people think about it.


Samsung

Imgur

Imgur

Large version here


Cryptocat Lobby

Imgur

Imgur


Amazon

Imgur

Imgur

Large version here


Boost

  • Imgur

    Imgur

Large version here

  • Imgur

    Imgur

Large version here

Note by Agnishom Chattopadhyay
2 years, 5 months ago

No vote yet
1 vote

Comments

Sort by:

Top Newest

@John Muradeli : What do you think about this? Agnishom Chattopadhyay · 2 years, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

@Agnishom Chattopadhyay LOOL AGNISHOM THIS @$*! IS HILLARIOUS!! I just read the whole thing - and I thought I was the only one going crazy in customer support chatrooms xDD

lolz I have no idea as far as the answer to that question goes, but great job trolling those cyborg representatives! cyborg cause if you look how similar their responses are, you'll see they mostly follow a script - or, a program ;)

Now if I knew what the heck a cardinal is, I might have a better idea. But I'll tell you one thing:

If a solution to that problem exists, I don't have an answer. If a solution to that problem doesn't exist, I have the answer. John Muradeli · 2 years, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

@John Muradeli Well, this problem is called Continuum Hypothesis. You may look it up on wikipedia.

Cardinality of a set is loosely defined as the number of elements in that set. E.g, Cardinality({Calvin, Sue, Pete, Arron})=4

The cardinality of the set of real numbers is higher than the set of natural numbers, as you might notice, even though they are both infinite.

The question is if there is any set whose cardinality is between these two.

Well, if you have any chatroom transcripts, please share them. Agnishom Chattopadhyay · 2 years, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

@Agnishom Chattopadhyay The integer set? In a sense has twice as many cardinals and includes zero, too.

The complex integer set? Integers with complex interger combos.

The whole number set? Includes zero.

The rational number set? Real minus irrational.

The irrational number set? Real minus rational. John Muradeli · 2 years, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

@John Muradeli Please do not infer the word cardinal in that sense.

We say that two sets are of the same cardinality if there is a bijection, i.e, an way to associate all elements of one set with all elements of the other.

For example, {Red, Green Blue} and {A,B,C} are of the same cardinality because we may establish a bijection like this:

A -> Green, B -> Blue, C -> Red

That is why we can say that the number of elements in set 1 = number of elements in set 2 or their cardinalities are equal.

It can be shown that there are as many integers as rational numbers or natural numbers by establishing a bijection between them. Agnishom Chattopadhyay · 2 years, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

@Agnishom Chattopadhyay Can it, really? Then why can't it be shown that there's as many real numbers as natural numbers?

I've seen on YouTube though how the number of real numbers between 0 and 1 is greater than the number of Natural numbers due to some weird property that lets you invent more numbers than natural ones allow or some weird stuff like that...

But alright what about, at least, complex integer set? It's like complex natural numbers and their negative counterparts (and zero!). Can you "show" that too?

Anyway, I hold the answer to your question, like I said. If a condition applies... John Muradeli · 2 years, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

@John Muradeli What is the answer?

Post 7 in this thread Agnishom Chattopadhyay · 2 years, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

@Agnishom Chattopadhyay Nvm I have no idea what the answer is.

Sorry :p John Muradeli · 2 years, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

@John Muradeli LOL.

Check that link Agnishom Chattopadhyay · 2 years, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

@Agnishom Chattopadhyay Hm. Looks interesting. I'll add it to my Important list for the next week (got hw from 7AP classes as of now).

Thanks! John Muradeli · 2 years, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

@John Muradeli Hahaha... LOL Agnishom Chattopadhyay · 2 years, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

Comment deleted Oct 26, 2014

Log in to reply

@John Muradeli Mandatory xkcd reference Agnishom Chattopadhyay · 2 years, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

@Agnishom Chattopadhyay You made that website, didn't you? ;p John Muradeli · 2 years, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

@John Muradeli No. xkcd is an webcomic by the great Randall Munroe Agnishom Chattopadhyay · 2 years, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

Dude, this made my day, I read this when just woke up and I believe that this was the first time I didn't sleep through a morning chem lecture. Trevor Arashiro · 2 years, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

@Trevor Arashiro Glad that you like it Agnishom Chattopadhyay · 2 years, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

WOW!!! Troll of the millennium, I wish I were there in place of those ppl you trrolled, wanna find how it feels to be trolled, @Agnishom Chattopadhyay Satvik Golechha · 2 years, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

@Agnishom Chattopadhyay , it appears that you've made a typo in the statement of the continuum hypothesis. Mursalin Habib · 2 years, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

@Mursalin Habib Yup, fixed it. Thanks :) Agnishom Chattopadhyay · 2 years, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

Have u really chatted with them? @Agnishom Chattopadhyay Ravi Dwivedi · 1 year, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

@Ravi Dwivedi Yes. Please don't let them know it was me Agnishom Chattopadhyay · 1 year, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

@Agnishom Chattopadhyay Why u did that??any purpose in mind?? Ravi Dwivedi · 1 year, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

@Ravi Dwivedi Not really Agnishom Chattopadhyay · 1 year, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

Thank you for helping me with the code, Agnishom :) John Muradeli · 2 years, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

@John Muradeli Mention not Agnishom Chattopadhyay · 2 years, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...