Hey Brilliantinians! Here I have some amazing problems.

**Problem 1** Let \(x, y, z\) be natural numbers. Find all triples such that:

\(\sqrt[6x-y^{2}-7]{\sqrt[6y-z^{2}-7]{\sqrt[6z-x^{2}-7]{728x+729y+730z}}}\) is a positive integer.

**Problem 2** Proof that for any prime diferent that 2 and 5, there exists a multiple of p whose digit numbers are all 9's. For example, for \(p = 13 \rightarrow 999999 = 13 \cdot 76923\).

**Problem 3**
Natural numbers "a" and "b" satisfy that:

\(\frac{a+1}{b} + \frac{b+1}{a}\) is an integer. Proof that the greatest common divisor of \((a,b) \le \sqrt{a + b}\)

No vote yet

1 vote

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...

Easy Math Editor

`*italics*`

or`_italics_`

italics`**bold**`

or`__bold__`

boldNote: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctlyparagraph 1

paragraph 2

`[example link](https://brilliant.org)`

`> This is a quote`

Remember to wrap math in \( ... \) or \[ ... \] to ensure proper formatting.`2 \times 3`

`2^{34}`

`a_{i-1}`

`\frac{2}{3}`

`\sqrt{2}`

`\sum_{i=1}^3`

`\sin \theta`

`\boxed{123}`

## Comments

Sort by:

TopNewestFor Problem 2, we know that strings of n 9's are equal to 10^n - 1. Now by Fermat's Little Theorem, 10^(p-1) - 1 = 0 mod p where p is coprime to 10. As p is not 2 or 5 this statement is therefore true hence the result follows.

Log in to reply

That's exactly how it is done! With your permission I'll format your solution, just to make it more eye-pleasure for other people.

-We know that strings of n 9's are in the form \(10^n - 1.\)

Now by Fermat's Little Theorem, \(10^{p-1}-1 \equiv 0 \pmod p\) if \(\gcd(p,10) = 1\) As \(p\) is not \(2\) or \(5\) this statement is therefore true hence the result follows.

EXAMPLE: That means if we choose for example \(p = 7 \rightarrow 10^{6} - 1 = 7k \)

NOTE: Fermat's Teorem doesn't give us the minimum 9's string that achieves the condition.

For example for \(p = 13\) using Fermat's Theorem we get \( 10^{12}- 1 = 999999999999 \equiv 0 \pmod{13}\) but in the example we saw \(999999 = 13 \cdot 76923 \)

Log in to reply

Yes, thank you for the formatting! In fact I think the lowest power of 10 which works is called the order of \(10\bmod p \). Nice problem.

Log in to reply

Just adding on, 3, 13, 31, 37, 41, 43, 53, 67, 71, 79, 83, 89, 107, 151, 157, 163, 173, 191, 197, 199, 227, 239, 241, 271, 277, 281, 283, 293, 307, 311, 317, 347, 359, 373, 397, 401, 409, 431, 439, 443, 449, 467, 479, 521, 523, 547, 557, 563, 569, 587, 599, 601, 613, 631, 641, ... are some of the numbers such that another string of \(9\)s can be found that the number of nines that other string contains equals to \(\frac{p-1}{2}\) apart from \(p-1\).

Just something interesting I found.

Log in to reply

Good observation.

This is another variant of the problem.

Log in to reply

Another way (generalised for any integer n not coprime to 2 or 5) is pigeonhole principle: out of the infinitely many powers of 10: 1, 10, 100, ... there exists two with the same remainder when divided by n. Subtracting gives a number 999...999000...000, but n is coprime to 2 or 5 so it divides 999...999.

If you don't remove the 0s then it becomes a proof for the problem below by @Calvin Lin

Log in to reply

That is a very nice solution.

Log in to reply