Determine $\displaystyle{\lim_{n\to\infty} x_n}$ if $\left(1+\frac{1}{n}\right)^{n+x_n}=e$

I have typed 2 methods giving two different answers

$\lim_{n\to\infty}\left(1+\frac{1}{n}\right)^{n+x_n}=\lim_{n\to\infty}e\\\implies \lim_{n\to\infty}\left(1+\frac{1}{n}\right)^{n}\cdot\lim_{n\to\infty}\left(1+\frac{1}{n}\right)^{x_n}=e\\\implies e\cdot\lim_{n\to\infty}\left(1+\frac{1}{n}\right)^{x_n}=e \\\implies \lim_{n\to\infty}\left(1+\frac{1}{n}\right)^{x_n}=1$ Also as $x_n$ was finite $(\to 1) ^ {finite} = 1$ and thus $x_n$ cannot be determined.

Take log both sides and get $\left(x_n+n\right)\ln\left(1+\frac{1}{n}\right)=1$ Also as $t=\frac{1}{n};n\to\infty;t\to0$ Now $x_n=\frac{1}{\ln\left(1+t\right)}-\frac{1}{t}=\frac{t-\ln\left(1+t\right)}{t^2\left(\frac{\ln\left(1+t\right)}{t}\right)}$ $\lim_{n\to\infty}x_n=\lim_{t\to0}\frac{t-\ln\left(1+t\right)}{t^2\left(\frac{\ln\left(1+t\right)}{t}\right)}=\lim_{t\to0}\frac{t-\ln\left(1+t\right)}{t^2}\cdot\lim_{t\to0}\frac{1}{\frac{\ln\left(1+t\right)}{t}}=\frac{1}{2}\cdot1$ (Used certain standard limits which you can solve by series or wikipedia for more methods.)

Please help.

(By the way I typed the note in Mathquill. Really nice to use)

No vote yet

1 vote

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...

$</code> ... <code>$</code>...<code>."> Easy Math Editor

`*italics*`

or`_italics_`

italics`**bold**`

or`__bold__`

boldNote: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctlyparagraph 1

paragraph 2

`[example link](https://brilliant.org)`

`> This is a quote`

Remember to wrap math in $</span> ... <span>$ or $</span> ... <span>$ to ensure proper formatting.`2 \times 3`

`2^{34}`

`a_{i-1}`

`\frac{2}{3}`

`\sqrt{2}`

`\sum_{i=1}^3`

`\sin \theta`

`\boxed{123}`

## Comments

Sort by:

TopNewestI remember setting this question before - The Limit Of The Exponents.

The issue with your first method is that when you took limits in the first step, you increased the solution space of $x_n$ from being an exact value, to being a much larger set. This is why you reach the conclusion that $x_n$ cannot be determined. As you denoted, you only have forward implication signs, but not backward implication.

Note: It is true that if the limit of $Y_n$ is $\frac{1}{2}$ (or any other constant), then the limit of $\left( 1 + \frac{1}{n} \right) ^{Y_n} =1$.

Log in to reply

I don't understand what you want to say. Can you please explain in more simple English and less higher math jargon?

Log in to reply

The simple english version is that your implications only work one way (as indicated by your forward arrows). Hence, the given condition implies your final conclusion, but not necessarily the other way around.

As an example, what you did was equivalent to saying that

$x = 1 \Rightarrow x ^2 = 1 \Rightarrow x^2 - 1 = 0 \Rightarrow (x-1)(x+1) + 0 \Rightarrow x = 1 \text{ or }-1.$

and claiming that $x = -1$ is a solution to the original equation. This is not true, because the implications only work one way. We only have $x = 1 \Rightarrow x = 1 \text{ or } -1$ but we do not have $x = 1 \text{ or } -1 \Rightarrow x = 1$.

You can see how in the first implication, you increased the solution space from 1 element, to 2 elements.

Log in to reply

Log in to reply

Whenever you manipulate equations (or inequalities), you need to be acutely aware of that.

Log in to reply

Log in to reply

It's true that $x_n$ can be any constant, there is no problem with that.

Log in to reply

That's no true. Youu can use series expansion to get the answer as $\frac{1}{2}$. Also I know another method to get this answer. Please wait for me to type it out today night.

Log in to reply

Calvin says that it can be any other finite constant, so it is :D.

Log in to reply

$x_n$ (as defined in the question) is any finite constant".

I did not say that "the limit ofI said that IF the limit of $Y_n$ (which is not the same as the sequence defined in the question) is any finite constant, then the limit of $(1 + \frac{1}{n} ) ^{ Y_n}$ is 1.

Log in to reply

Log in to reply

$x_n$ is defined in a very unique way in the question.

No.It is likely that you are confused because I used the same variable throughout. Let me make an edit.

Log in to reply

Log in to reply

$\displaystyle{\lim_{x\to a} f(x) ^{g(x)} = \lim{x\to a} f(x)^{\lim{x\to a} g(x)} }$ and so wont we get $\lim_{n\to\infty} x_n =anything$

WellLog in to reply

$\infty$. Look through the proofs, and see why these edges cases are important.

Very very false. You will get issues if these sequences approach 0 orSee for example They told me that $0^0 = 1$, but why? .

Log in to reply

@Bogdan Simeonov Now see the Method 2 in the note

Log in to reply