# Doubt in em

Hi brilliant,

I've got a problem in question number 3.143 of the book Problems in general physics by Irodov.

The question states,

A parallel-plate capacitor was lowered into water in a horizontal, with water filling up the gap between the plates d meter wide. Then a constant voltage $V$ was applied to the capacitor. Find the water pressure increment in the gap. Take relative permittivity of water as $\varepsilon$.

I solved it as follows:

• Electrostatic pressure on a point in the capacitor before water was filled:

${ P }_{ 1 }=\frac { 1 }{ 2 } { \varepsilon }_{ 0 }{ E }^{ 2 }=\frac { 1 }{ 2 } { \varepsilon }_{ 0 }{ \left( \frac { V }{ d } \right) }^{ 2 }$

• Electrostatic pressure on a point in the capacitor before water was filled:

${ P }_{ 2 }=\frac { 1 }{ 2 } { \varepsilon \varepsilon }_{ 0 }{ E }^{ 2 }=\frac { 1 }{ 2 } { \varepsilon \varepsilon }_{ 0 }{ \left( \frac { V }{ d } \right) }^{ 2 }$

• Therefore increase in pressure = $\Delta P=\frac { 1 }{ 2 } { \varepsilon }_{ 0 }\left( \varepsilon -1 \right) { \left( \frac { V }{ d } \right) }^{ 2 }$

But the answer given in the solution is:

$\Delta P=\frac { 1 }{ 2 } { \varepsilon }_{ 0 }\varepsilon \left( \varepsilon -1 \right) { \left( \frac { V }{ d } \right) }^{ 2 }$

Please check if my solution is right. Please correct me.

Note by Aditya Kumar
5 years, 7 months ago

This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.

When posting on Brilliant:

• Use the emojis to react to an explanation, whether you're congratulating a job well done , or just really confused .
• Ask specific questions about the challenge or the steps in somebody's explanation. Well-posed questions can add a lot to the discussion, but posting "I don't understand!" doesn't help anyone.
• Try to contribute something new to the discussion, whether it is an extension, generalization or other idea related to the challenge.
• Stay on topic — we're all here to learn more about math and science, not to hear about your favorite get-rich-quick scheme or current world events.

MarkdownAppears as
*italics* or _italics_ italics
**bold** or __bold__ bold
- bulleted- list
• bulleted
• list
1. numbered2. list
1. numbered
2. list
Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly
paragraph 1paragraph 2

paragraph 1

paragraph 2

[example link](https://brilliant.org)example link
> This is a quote
This is a quote
    # I indented these lines
# 4 spaces, and now they show
# up as a code block.

print "hello world"
# I indented these lines
# 4 spaces, and now they show
# up as a code block.

print "hello world"
MathAppears as
Remember to wrap math in $$ ... $$ or $ ... $ to ensure proper formatting.
2 \times 3 $2 \times 3$
2^{34} $2^{34}$
a_{i-1} $a_{i-1}$
\frac{2}{3} $\frac{2}{3}$
\sqrt{2} $\sqrt{2}$
\sum_{i=1}^3 $\sum_{i=1}^3$
\sin \theta $\sin \theta$
\boxed{123} $\boxed{123}$

## Comments

Sort by:

Top Newest
- 5 years, 7 months ago

Log in to reply

This looks like a typo to me, unless I'm missing something.

Staff - 5 years, 7 months ago

Log in to reply

Sir what can u say about my method? Is it right?

- 5 years, 7 months ago

Log in to reply

I find no problem with your approach. I think your work is correct.

Staff - 5 years, 7 months ago

Log in to reply

Thanks a lot sir!

- 5 years, 7 months ago

Log in to reply

I don't think this method is right - the charge distribution and hence the field will not remain same with and without the dielectric (water in this case). What do you think?

- 2 years, 10 months ago

Log in to reply

Yeah, dimensionally speaking, the given answer is wrong. Must be a typo.

- 5 years, 7 months ago

Log in to reply

Can u verify my solution??

- 5 years, 7 months ago

Log in to reply

Wait a minute: does the question say that permittivity of water is $\epsilon$ or that the relative permittivity of water is $\epsilon$?

- 5 years, 7 months ago

Log in to reply

Relative permittivity

- 5 years, 7 months ago

Log in to reply

But your method is fine.

- 5 years, 7 months ago

Log in to reply

Thanks for reviewing it!

- 5 years, 7 months ago

Log in to reply

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...