We define Set as: " The collection of well defined and distinct objects", but empty set has no object. By what reason it is called a Set...???

No vote yet

1 vote

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...

## Comments

Sort by:

TopNewestA collection of nothing is still a collection. – Ryan Soedjak · 3 years, 4 months ago

Log in to reply

– Bob Krueger · 3 years, 4 months ago

said the troll.Log in to reply

Is not zero a well-defined and distinct number? If we define numbers to be well-defined distinct quantities, it could be argued that zero is not a number, because

nothingis not a quantity. The argument is trivial; whether or not zero is considered a number, it doesn't affect anything we do. 1 - 1 would still be nothing. In the same vein, whether or not the null set is a set is a meaningless question, because it doesn't affect our calculations in any way. – Raj Magesh · 3 years, 4 months agoLog in to reply

The key idea is that sets are not defined (and neither are numbers, as you've touched upon). They are constructed, and their properties are stated, but they are not defined. – Alexander Bourzutschky · 3 years, 4 months ago

Log in to reply

In formal set theory (i.e. ZF), "set" is an undefined term. It ends up having to be, similar to how "number" and "point" also remain undefined.

Hence, the empty set is not hampered by definition. In set theories, it is generally one of the easier theorems to prove that a set without elements exists and is unique, and thus one has an empty set. – Alexander Bourzutschky · 3 years, 4 months ago

Log in to reply

Give answer with proof – Shah Jamal Wazir · 3 years, 4 months ago

Log in to reply