Waste less time on Facebook — follow Brilliant.
×

Euclid's fifth postulate

Here is a possible proof of Euclid's 5th postulate Suppose that the two lines meet on the other side i.e. not on the side where sum of interior angles on the same side of transversal is less than 180 degrees. This will force the sum of angles of the triangle formed to be greater than 180 degrees which is not possible. So lines must meet on the opposite side where sum of interior angles on the same side of transversal is less than 180 degrees. what is wrong ?

Note by Kumar Saurav
4 years, 7 months ago

No vote yet
4 votes

  Easy Math Editor

MarkdownAppears as
*italics* or _italics_ italics
**bold** or __bold__ bold

- bulleted
- list

  • bulleted
  • list

1. numbered
2. list

  1. numbered
  2. list
Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly
paragraph 1

paragraph 2

paragraph 1

paragraph 2

[example link](https://brilliant.org)example link
> This is a quote
This is a quote
    # I indented these lines
    # 4 spaces, and now they show
    # up as a code block.

    print "hello world"
# I indented these lines
# 4 spaces, and now they show
# up as a code block.

print "hello world"
MathAppears as
Remember to wrap math in \( ... \) or \[ ... \] to ensure proper formatting.
2 \times 3 \( 2 \times 3 \)
2^{34} \( 2^{34} \)
a_{i-1} \( a_{i-1} \)
\frac{2}{3} \( \frac{2}{3} \)
\sqrt{2} \( \sqrt{2} \)
\sum_{i=1}^3 \( \sum_{i=1}^3 \)
\sin \theta \( \sin \theta \)
\boxed{123} \( \boxed{123} \)

Comments

Sort by:

Top Newest

How do you prove that sum of angles of a triangle is 180. In that proof You used the idea that a line parallel to another line can be constructed from any other point ( apart from one on the original line itself) So this statement is another equivalent to the 5 th axiom So since you already used an equivalent of the 5th axiom to prove that property u cannot use it again to prove the axiom. Therein lies the mistake of your proof

Pranav Chakravarthy - 4 years, 7 months ago

Log in to reply

Non euclidean geometry with hyperbolic,spherical triangles and fractals,right ?

Edward Elric - 4 years, 7 months ago

Log in to reply

As Pranav says.....................it's true that you have used the 5th axiom and thus it no longer remains correct.

Edward Elric - 4 years, 7 months ago

Log in to reply

How will you prove that the other side will have sum of angles grater than 180 ? Nice try chum using contradiction. But no one yet has been able to prove this postulate with other 4 axioms .

Fact to know : While trying to prove this postulate using the 4 axioms , non-euclidean geometry was developed !

Priyansh Sangule - 4 years, 7 months ago

Log in to reply

Nice try............

Rushikesh Jogdand - 4 years, 7 months ago

Log in to reply

Don't understand. :(

Zi Song Yeoh - 4 years, 7 months ago

Log in to reply

proof for sum of of angles of triangle uses alternate interior angles theorem which is derived from corresponding angles theorem

Kumar Saurav - 4 years, 7 months ago

Log in to reply

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...