I've taken this screenshot from this Brilliant Wiki Page.

I don't understand how (2) follows from (1).

Can anyone help me, please, with some details?

I've taken this screenshot from this Brilliant Wiki Page.

I don't understand how (2) follows from (1).

Can anyone help me, please, with some details?

No vote yet

1 vote

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...

## Comments

Sort by:

TopNewestI agree that this proof is poorly written up. The explanation should go something like this (see page 1 and 2).

@Calvin Lin@Eli Ross you might want to look into this. – Pi Han Goh · 8 months, 3 weeks ago

Log in to reply

– Muhammad Rasel Parvej · 8 months, 3 weeks ago

Thank you very much!Log in to reply

– Calvin Lin Staff · 8 months, 3 weeks ago

Do you follow the proof? If so, can you help us add more explanation into the wiki so that others who are new to it can likewise read and understand?Log in to reply

– Muhammad Rasel Parvej · 8 months, 2 weeks ago

I'll try to do so.Log in to reply