Let the cevians with endpoints \(B\) and \(C\) intersect \(AC\) and \(AB\) at \(I_\text{swag}\) and \(I_\text{yolo}\), respectively. Let \(BI_\text{swag}\) and \(CI_\text{yolo}\) intersect at \(I_\text{sa}\). Let \(area(\triangle AI_\text{sa}I_\text{yolo})\) be \(A_\text{bad}\) and \(area(\triangle AI_\text{sa}I_\text{swag})\) be \(A_\text{toed}\). Condsider triangles \(\triangle AI_\text{yolo}B\) and \(\triangle AI_\text{yolo}I_\text{sa}\). Since they share the same altitude, creary \[\frac{A_\text{bad}}{9+A_\text{bad}+A_\text{toed}}=\frac8{8+12}.\] Similarly, consider triangles \(\triangle AI_\text{swag}C\) and \(\triangle AI_\text{swag}I_\text{sa}\). Since they share an altitude, creary \[\frac{A_\text{bad}}{A_\text{bad}+A_\text{toed}+8}=\frac9{9+21}.\] Solving for \(A_\text{bad}\) and \(A_\text{toed}\) gives \(A_\text{bad}=21\) and \(A_\text{toed}\), so the answer is \(A_\text{bad}+A_\text{toed}={\huge A_\text{BAD TOED}}=41\).

EDIT: why is this getting downvoted? It's perfectly legit.

EDIT: Ok I'll actually elaborate the most confusing part.

So note that triangles \(\triangle I_\text{yolo}CI_\text{sa}\) and \(\triangle BI_\text{sa}C\) have the same height so the ratio of their areas is the same as the ratio of their bases. Thus \[\frac{I_\text{yolo}I_\text{sa}}{I_\text{yolo}I_\text{sa}+I_\text{sa}B}=\frac8{8+12}.\]
So that's how I got \[\frac{A_\text{bad}}{9+A_\text{bad}+A_\text{toed}}=\frac8{8+12}.\]

Okay, let me give an explanation with slightly less confusing variable names. We use the notation \([X]\) to denote the area of triangle \(X\).

Let the point on side \(AB\) which is hit by the line emanating from \(C\) be \(K\). Define \(L\) on \(AC\) similarly. Let \(M\) be the intersection of lines \(CK\) and \(BL\). Let the areas of \(\triangle AKM\) and \(\triangle ALM\) be \(R\) and \(S\) respectively.

Notice that \(\frac{[ALM]}{[LMC]} = \frac{[ABL]}{[BLC]} = \frac{AL}{LC}\). In terms of \(R\), \(S\), and numbers, we get that \[\frac{S}8 = \frac{9+R+S}{12+8}, \quad \text{or} \\ \frac{S}{9+R+S} = \frac{8}{12+8}.\] Also, notice that \(\frac{[AKM]}{[KMB]} = \frac{[ACK]}{[CKB]} = \frac{AK}{KB}\). In terms of \(R\), \(S\), and numbers, we get that \[\frac{R}{9} = \frac{8+R+S}{9+12}, \quad \text{or} \\ \frac{R}{8+R+S} = \frac{9}{9+12}.\]

Finally, we solve. After simplifying and cross-multiplying both equations, we get \(5S = 18+2R+2S\) and \(7R = 24+3R+3S\). From the second equation, we get that \(R = 6+\frac34S\), and substituting in the first equation, \(5S = 18 + 12 + \frac32S + 2S\). Hence, \(\frac32S = 30\), or \(S = 20\). Substituting this back in the first equation gives \(42=2R\), or \(21=R\).

Hence, the requested area is \(20+21 = \boxed{41}.\)

Unless you want me to find the area of X in the diagram by assuming the diagram is perfectly to scale (which is trivial), I'm convinced there is no mathematical way to find the area given the current information. Though I would love to be proved wrong...

Easy Math Editor

`*italics*`

or`_italics_`

italics`**bold**`

or`__bold__`

boldNote: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctlyparagraph 1

paragraph 2

`[example link](https://brilliant.org)`

`> This is a quote`

Remember to wrap math in \( ... \) or \[ ... \] to ensure proper formatting.`2 \times 3`

`2^{34}`

`a_{i-1}`

`\frac{2}{3}`

`\sqrt{2}`

`\sum_{i=1}^3`

`\sin \theta`

`\boxed{123}`

## Comments

Sort by:

TopNewestLet the cevians with endpoints \(B\) and \(C\) intersect \(AC\) and \(AB\) at \(I_\text{swag}\) and \(I_\text{yolo}\), respectively. Let \(BI_\text{swag}\) and \(CI_\text{yolo}\) intersect at \(I_\text{sa}\). Let \(area(\triangle AI_\text{sa}I_\text{yolo})\) be \(A_\text{bad}\) and \(area(\triangle AI_\text{sa}I_\text{swag})\) be \(A_\text{toed}\). Condsider triangles \(\triangle AI_\text{yolo}B\) and \(\triangle AI_\text{yolo}I_\text{sa}\). Since they share the same altitude, creary \[\frac{A_\text{bad}}{9+A_\text{bad}+A_\text{toed}}=\frac8{8+12}.\] Similarly, consider triangles \(\triangle AI_\text{swag}C\) and \(\triangle AI_\text{swag}I_\text{sa}\). Since they share an altitude, creary \[\frac{A_\text{bad}}{A_\text{bad}+A_\text{toed}+8}=\frac9{9+21}.\] Solving for \(A_\text{bad}\) and \(A_\text{toed}\) gives \(A_\text{bad}=21\) and \(A_\text{toed}\), so the answer is \(A_\text{bad}+A_\text{toed}={\huge A_\text{BAD TOED}}=41\).

EDIT: why is this getting downvoted? It's perfectly legit.

Log in to reply

u nailed it!

Log in to reply

I think I've learned a little from you. Thank you. :)

Log in to reply

Your answer isn't clear "at least to me".

Log in to reply

Bad toed

yolo sa

EDIT: Ok I'll actually elaborate the most confusing part.

So note that triangles \(\triangle I_\text{yolo}CI_\text{sa}\) and \(\triangle BI_\text{sa}C\) have the same height so the ratio of their areas is the same as the ratio of their bases. Thus \[\frac{I_\text{yolo}I_\text{sa}}{I_\text{yolo}I_\text{sa}+I_\text{sa}B}=\frac8{8+12}.\] So that's how I got \[\frac{A_\text{bad}}{9+A_\text{bad}+A_\text{toed}}=\frac8{8+12}.\]

Log in to reply

Okay, let me give an explanation with slightly less confusing variable names. We use the notation \([X]\) to denote the area of triangle \(X\).

Let the point on side \(AB\) which is hit by the line emanating from \(C\) be \(K\). Define \(L\) on \(AC\) similarly. Let \(M\) be the intersection of lines \(CK\) and \(BL\). Let the areas of \(\triangle AKM\) and \(\triangle ALM\) be \(R\) and \(S\) respectively.

Notice that \(\frac{[ALM]}{[LMC]} = \frac{[ABL]}{[BLC]} = \frac{AL}{LC}\). In terms of \(R\), \(S\), and numbers, we get that \[\frac{S}8 = \frac{9+R+S}{12+8}, \quad \text{or} \\ \frac{S}{9+R+S} = \frac{8}{12+8}.\] Also, notice that \(\frac{[AKM]}{[KMB]} = \frac{[ACK]}{[CKB]} = \frac{AK}{KB}\). In terms of \(R\), \(S\), and numbers, we get that \[\frac{R}{9} = \frac{8+R+S}{9+12}, \quad \text{or} \\ \frac{R}{8+R+S} = \frac{9}{9+12}.\]

Finally, we solve. After simplifying and cross-multiplying both equations, we get \(5S = 18+2R+2S\) and \(7R = 24+3R+3S\). From the second equation, we get that \(R = 6+\frac34S\), and substituting in the first equation, \(5S = 18 + 12 + \frac32S + 2S\). Hence, \(\frac32S = 30\), or \(S = 20\). Substituting this back in the first equation gives \(42=2R\), or \(21=R\).

Hence, the requested area is \(20+21 = \boxed{41}.\)

Log in to reply

In a family of 3children what is the probability of having at least one boy

Log in to reply

Unless you want me to find the area of X in the diagram by assuming the diagram is perfectly to scale (which is trivial), I'm convinced there is no mathematical way to find the area given the current information. Though I would love to be proved wrong...

Log in to reply

You're wrong.

Log in to reply

Great proof

Log in to reply

Log in to reply