Force Between Two "Short" Current-Carrying Wires

In attempting to solve a community problem posted recently, I derived a formula for the magnetic force between two current-carrying wire segments of arbitrary length (but same for both) and arbitrary spacing. These may well be parts of infinite line segments, but the formula only accounts for the interactions between the two finite segments. The derivation is rather tedious, so I won't post it right now:

The formula ends up being:

F=μ0I1I22π(D2+L2D1)F = \frac{\mu_0 I_1 I_2}{2 \pi} \Big ( \frac{\sqrt{D^2 + L^2}}{D} -1 \Big )

For conductor length much larger than the spacing, the result reduces to:

Fμ0I1I22πLDF \approx \frac{\mu_0 I_1 I_2}{2 \pi} \frac{L}{D}

The second formula is the well-known expression for the force between two long wires, so that's a good sign. I have also confirmed the result with numerical simulations.

Does anybody else know off the top of their head that this is correct?

Note by Steven Chase
1 year ago

No vote yet
1 vote

</code>...<code></code> ... <code>.">   Easy Math Editor

MarkdownAppears as
*italics* or _italics_ italics
**bold** or __bold__ bold

- bulleted
- list

  • bulleted
  • list

1. numbered
2. list

  1. numbered
  2. list
Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly
paragraph 1

paragraph 2

paragraph 1

paragraph 2

[example link]( link
> This is a quote
This is a quote
    # I indented these lines
    # 4 spaces, and now they show
    # up as a code block.

    print "hello world"
# I indented these lines
# 4 spaces, and now they show
# up as a code block.

print "hello world"
MathAppears as
Remember to wrap math in </span>...<span></span> ... <span> or </span>...<span></span> ... <span> to ensure proper formatting.
2 \times 3 2×3 2 \times 3
2^{34} 234 2^{34}
a_{i-1} ai1 a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3} 23 \frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2} 2 \sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3 i=13 \sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta sinθ \sin \theta
\boxed{123} 123 \boxed{123}


Sort by:

Top Newest

@Laszlo Mihaly @Ashish Siva What do you think?

Steven Chase - 1 year ago

Log in to reply

yes, I attempted the derivation and obtained the same result. Musn't be a coincidence. ;)

Ashish Siva - 1 year ago

Log in to reply

I would calculate the vector potential ( easier than Biot Savart), take the gradient and integrate the force over the length of the other wire. Too busy with real work to do it.

Laszlo Mihaly - 1 year ago

Log in to reply


Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...