This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science
related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should
explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments
should further the discussion of math and science.

When posting on Brilliant:

Use the emojis to react to an explanation, whether you're congratulating a job well done , or just really confused .

Ask specific questions about the challenge or the steps in somebody's explanation. Well-posed questions can add a lot to the discussion, but posting "I don't understand!" doesn't help anyone.

Try to contribute something new to the discussion, whether it is an extension, generalization or other idea related to the challenge.

Stay on topic — we're all here to learn more about math and science, not to hear about your favorite get-rich-quick scheme or current world events.

Markdown

Appears as

*italics* or _italics_

italics

**bold** or __bold__

bold

- bulleted - list

bulleted

list

1. numbered 2. list

numbered

list

Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly

We don't have to use cyclic properties.We extend the line $AY$ to meet $BC$ at $K.$We apply Menelaus theorem for $\triangle BCX$ where $AK$ is the transverse.So we get $\dfrac{BA}{AX}\times\dfrac{XY}{YC}\times\dfrac{KC}{KB}=-1.$Since $BA$ is twice of $AX$ and $XY=YC.$We get $\dfrac{KC}{KB}=\dfrac{1}{2}.$We don't have care about the minus sign as it only to show $A$ does not lie between $BX.$Next we apply Ceva's theorem for $\triangle ABC.$We get $\dfrac{AX}{BX}\times\dfrac{BK}{KC}\times\dfrac{ZC}{AZ}=1.$We know that $AX=BX$ and $BK=2KC.$So we get $\dfrac{ZC}{AZ}=\dfrac{1}{2}.$Therefore,$\boxed{AZ=2ZC}.$Hence proved.

Easy Math Editor

This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.

When posting on Brilliant:

`*italics*`

or`_italics_`

italics`**bold**`

or`__bold__`

boldNote: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctlyparagraph 1

paragraph 2

`[example link](https://brilliant.org)`

`> This is a quote`

Remember to wrap math in`\(`

...`\)`

or`\[`

...`\]`

to ensure proper formatting.`2 \times 3`

`2^{34}`

`a_{i-1}`

`\frac{2}{3}`

`\sqrt{2}`

`\sum_{i=1}^3`

`\sin \theta`

`\boxed{123}`

## Comments

Sort by:

TopNewestWe don't have to use cyclic properties.We extend the line $AY$ to meet $BC$ at $K.$We apply Menelaus theorem for $\triangle BCX$ where $AK$ is the transverse.So we get $\dfrac{BA}{AX}\times\dfrac{XY}{YC}\times\dfrac{KC}{KB}=-1.$Since $BA$ is twice of $AX$ and $XY=YC.$We get $\dfrac{KC}{KB}=\dfrac{1}{2}.$We don't have care about the minus sign as it only to show $A$ does not lie between $BX.$Next we apply Ceva's theorem for $\triangle ABC.$We get $\dfrac{AX}{BX}\times\dfrac{BK}{KC}\times\dfrac{ZC}{AZ}=1.$We know that $AX=BX$ and $BK=2KC.$So we get $\dfrac{ZC}{AZ}=\dfrac{1}{2}.$Therefore,$\boxed{AZ=2ZC}.$Hence proved.

Log in to reply

Why go for Menelaus when Thales' can do ?

Log in to reply

Proof:

Note that $ar(AXY)=ar (BXY)=ar(BYC)=ar(AYC)=\frac{ar(ABC)}{4}$

Since, median divides a triangle into 2 parts of equal areas.

Next, put AZ=$x$ and ZC=$y$

Now,

\frac {x}{x+y} * ar (ABC) = ar(ABZ) \(\implies \frac {x}{x+y}* ar (ABC) = \frac{ar (ABC)}{2} + ar (CYA)

$\implies \frac {x}{x+y} * ar (ABC) = \frac {ar (ABC}{2} + \frac{x}{x+y} * \frac {ar (ABC)}{4}$

$\implies \frac {x}{x+y}[ ar(ABC) - ar (CYA)] = ar(ABC)* \frac {1}{2}$

$\implies \frac {x}{x+y}[\frac {3}{4} * ar (CYAB) = \frac{ar (ABC)}{2}$

$\implies \frac {x}{x+y} * [\frac {3}{4}* ar (ABC)$

$\implies \frac {x}{x+y} = \frac {2}{3}$

$\implies x= 2y$

Hence, proved.

Log in to reply

Its not z, its x, unable to edit.

And forgive me for the brackets not being closed and other mistakes that I am unable to edit.

Log in to reply

I was unable to solve it using my limited knowledge of cyclic quads.

Log in to reply

There is no 3/4 in 4th last line.

Log in to reply

Log in to reply

This question can easily be solved using midpoint theorem and similarity rules as above.

Log in to reply

Seriously, BC cut AC at Z; wont that make Z coincide with C and consequently CZ will be 0.

Log in to reply

sorry my bad .i corrected it plss try to solve it and give mme the solution i will be gratefull

Log in to reply

you can use the cevas theorem and the menuluas theorem to prove this

Log in to reply

and can use properties of cyclic quadrilaterals beacause my teacher said that it can be solve by using the properties of cyclic quadrilaterals

Log in to reply