This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science
related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should
explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments
should further the discussion of math and science.

When posting on Brilliant:

Use the emojis to react to an explanation, whether you're congratulating a job well done , or just really confused .

Ask specific questions about the challenge or the steps in somebody's explanation. Well-posed questions can add a lot to the discussion, but posting "I don't understand!" doesn't help anyone.

Try to contribute something new to the discussion, whether it is an extension, generalization or other idea related to the challenge.

Stay on topic — we're all here to learn more about math and science, not to hear about your favorite get-rich-quick scheme or current world events.

Markdown

Appears as

*italics* or _italics_

italics

**bold** or __bold__

bold

- bulleted - list

bulleted

list

1. numbered 2. list

numbered

list

Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly

Multiply both sides by $z$ to get $z^n = i|z|^2 \Rightarrow |z| = 1$ after considering the modulus of both sides.
So, we get $z^n = i$ which are just the nth roots of $i$.

Sorry, I should have added that. Express $i$ as $e^{i\pi/2}$, and let $z = e^{i\theta}$
We have n roots given by,
( $k$ goes from $0$ to $n - 1$): $z^n = e^{i\pi/2} \\ \Rightarrow e^{in\theta} = e^{i\pi/2} \\ \Rightarrow n\theta = 2k\pi + \pi/2 \\ \Rightarrow \theta = \frac{(4k+ 1)\pi}{2n} \\ \Rightarrow z_k = e^{\frac{i(4k+ 1)\pi}{2n}}$

@Anik Mandal
–
Sure!
When you look at the complex plane, you see this: the complex plane
Each point in this plane determines a unique complex number.
For a point, the x coordinate determines the real part, and the y coordinate determines the imaginary part.
In the figure, we have $z = x + iy$.
This is called the Cartesian representation of a complex number. We can also represent complex numbers in another form, called the polar form.
In the polar form, each number is represented by two parameters, its modulus (r in the figure, the distance from the origin) and its argument ($\phi$, the angle shown in the figure). By varying these parameters, we can reach every complex number.
But if you think about it, how can the argument take a unique value for a specific $z$?
Indeed, if we rotated the angle by $2\pi$ radians then we would get the same number again. If we rotated it by $2\pi$ again, for a total of $4 \pi$ radians, we would get $z$ again! So we've seen that the argument is not affected by adding a multiple of $2\pi$.
Keep this in mind whenever we think about arguments of complex numbers.

We need to find a way to relate the two representations. Trigonometry is the way!
Looking at the right-angled triangle in the figure, $x = r \cos \phi$, and $y = r \sin \phi$, so, $z = r( \cos \phi + i\ sin \phi )$
It looks neat.
But where does $e^{i\phi}$ come from? The answer is here, Euler's formula.
This is the reason why complex numbers are so powerful. With this, we have, $e^{i\phi} = (\cos \phi + i\ sin \phi )$, so $z = r e^{i\phi}$
If I'm saying $z_1 = r_1e^{i\phi_1} = z_2 = r_2e^{i\phi_2}$, I mean their moduli are equal, but their arguments could differ by a multiple of $2\pi$. So $\phi_1 - \phi_2 = 2k\pi$ for some integer $k$.

This is where $n\theta = 2k\pi + \frac{\pi}{2}$ comes from, $n \theta$ is the same angle as $\frac{\pi}{2}$ upto a multiple of $2\pi$.

Easy Math Editor

This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.

When posting on Brilliant:

`*italics*`

or`_italics_`

italics`**bold**`

or`__bold__`

boldNote: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctlyparagraph 1

paragraph 2

`[example link](https://brilliant.org)`

`> This is a quote`

Remember to wrap math in`\(`

...`\)`

or`\[`

...`\]`

to ensure proper formatting.`2 \times 3`

`2^{34}`

`a_{i-1}`

`\frac{2}{3}`

`\sqrt{2}`

`\sum_{i=1}^3`

`\sin \theta`

`\boxed{123}`

## Comments

Sort by:

TopNewestMultiply both sides by $z$ to get $z^n = i|z|^2 \Rightarrow |z| = 1$ after considering the modulus of both sides. So, we get $z^n = i$ which are just the nth roots of $i$.

Log in to reply

How to find the nth roots of $i$?

Log in to reply

Sorry, I should have added that. Express $i$ as $e^{i\pi/2}$, and let $z = e^{i\theta}$ We have n roots given by,

( $k$ goes from $0$ to $n - 1$):

$z^n = e^{i\pi/2} \\ \Rightarrow e^{in\theta} = e^{i\pi/2} \\ \Rightarrow n\theta = 2k\pi + \pi/2 \\ \Rightarrow \theta = \frac{(4k+ 1)\pi}{2n} \\ \Rightarrow z_k = e^{\frac{i(4k+ 1)\pi}{2n}}$

Log in to reply

$n\theta = 2k\pi+\frac{\pi}{2}$

I am not too familiar with complex numbers..Can you please explain whyLog in to reply

When you look at the complex plane, you see this: the complex plane Each point in this plane determines a unique complex number.

For a point, the x coordinate determines the real part, and the y coordinate determines the imaginary part. In the figure, we have $z = x + iy$.

This is called the Cartesian representation of a complex number. We can also represent complex numbers in another form, called the polar form.

In the polar form, each number is represented by two parameters, its modulus (r in the figure, the distance from the origin) and its argument ($\phi$, the angle shown in the figure). By varying these parameters, we can reach every complex number.

But if you think about it, how can the argument take a unique value for a specific $z$?

Indeed, if we rotated the angle by $2\pi$ radians then we would get the same number again. If we rotated it by $2\pi$ again, for a total of $4 \pi$ radians, we would get $z$ again! So we've seen that the argument is not affected by adding a multiple of $2\pi$.

Keep this in mind whenever we think about arguments of complex numbers.

We need to find a way to relate the two representations. Trigonometry is the way!

Looking at the right-angled triangle in the figure,

$x = r \cos \phi$, and $y = r \sin \phi$, so, $z = r( \cos \phi + i\ sin \phi )$

It looks neat.

But where does $e^{i\phi}$ come from? The answer is here, Euler's formula.

This is the reason why complex numbers are so powerful. With this, we have,

$e^{i\phi} = (\cos \phi + i\ sin \phi )$, so $z = r e^{i\phi}$

If I'm saying $z_1 = r_1e^{i\phi_1} = z_2 = r_2e^{i\phi_2}$, I mean their moduli are equal, but their arguments could differ by a multiple of $2\pi$. So $\phi_1 - \phi_2 = 2k\pi$ for some integer $k$.

This is where $n\theta = 2k\pi + \frac{\pi}{2}$ comes from, $n \theta$ is the same angle as $\frac{\pi}{2}$ upto a multiple of $2\pi$.

Log in to reply

$n-1$?

That's was really helpful Sir!Thanks a lot! Sir one last doubt : Why was it k from 0 toLog in to reply

Thus k is from 0 to (n-1).

Log in to reply

Log in to reply

$k = 0$ and $k = n$ give the same root (arguments differ by $2\pi$).

Log in to reply

$e^{ix} = cosx +isinx$

Put $x=pi/2,5pi/2,9pi/2 \cdots ,2kpi +pi/2$, all will yeild i.

Hope this helps.

Log in to reply

Log in to reply

What about z=0?

Log in to reply

Smooth observation, missed that during the multiplication. Then we also require $n > 1$, though.

Log in to reply

Log in to reply