This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science
related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should
explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments
should further the discussion of math and science.

When posting on Brilliant:

Use the emojis to react to an explanation, whether you're congratulating a job well done , or just really confused .

Ask specific questions about the challenge or the steps in somebody's explanation. Well-posed questions can add a lot to the discussion, but posting "I don't understand!" doesn't help anyone.

Try to contribute something new to the discussion, whether it is an extension, generalization or other idea related to the challenge.

Stay on topic — we're all here to learn more about math and science, not to hear about your favorite get-rich-quick scheme or current world events.

Markdown

Appears as

*italics* or _italics_

italics

**bold** or __bold__

bold

- bulleted - list

bulleted

list

1. numbered 2. list

numbered

list

Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly

@Mahdi Raza
–
I was about to comment the proof-related to combinations after I saw Percy's proof, but then I saw you writing this (sad noises) LOL. I will write the proof-related to permutations then.

I assume the reader knows, about permutations and a little about factorials.

The formula for no. of permutations is ${ _{ n }{ P }_{ k } }=P(n,k)=\frac { n! }{ (n-k)! }$ or basically if we take any $k$ objects from $n$ objects at a time, then how many ways can the $k$ objects be arranged is the number of permutations.

So, if we take $n$ objects from $n$ objects and ask for the number of ways we can arrange them, basically we are asking how many ways can all the $n$ objects be arranged which by a primary definition of factorials is n! So using permutations we can write as,

A common-sensical(Yeah, I just invented that word, deal with it) approach would be that 0! is 0 multiplied 0 times because 1 is greater than 0. 0 multiplied 0 times is $0^{0}$, aka 1 :) @SRIJAN Singh@Siddharth Chakravarty

What do you even mean? I would suggest the common-sensical way, Lol that 0! Means how many ways can we arrange 0 objects which should be 1 i.e there is no way or to do nothing.

$n! = n(n-1)(n-2) \ldots 1$ or $n!$ is product of all numbers less than n and greater than 1. There are 0 ways to reach 1 from 0 like that $0! = 0^{0} = 1$. THis is in a vague sense @Siddharth Chakravarty

@A Former Brilliant Member
–
Did you just defy yourself because you said product of all number less than n and greater than 1, and 0 has no number less than it which is greater than 1? Basically the factorial notation was brought into due to permutations and combinations as I said in the comment.

What's with the notifications? I got like 10 of them in this note, leading nowhere, are you guys sending and deleting comments @Siddharth Chakravarty and @SRIJAN Singh ????

@A Former Brilliant Member
–
yah i also if i hover to notification button and then click ,if i get bore scrolling comments than CLICK DISMISS ALL LOL USED IF many times

@A Former Brilliant Member
–
$\text{\large I think to do the same, but I am not doing, incase somebody comments something useful, notifications don't worry much}$

$n!$ is the number of ways you can order a set with $n$ elements, and the only way to order an empty set (with $0$ elements) is the empty set {} itself.

Easy Math Editor

This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.

When posting on Brilliant:

`*italics*`

or`_italics_`

italics`**bold**`

or`__bold__`

boldNote: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctlyparagraph 1

paragraph 2

`[example link](https://brilliant.org)`

`> This is a quote`

Remember to wrap math in`\(`

...`\)`

or`\[`

...`\]`

to ensure proper formatting.`2 \times 3`

`2^{34}`

`a_{i-1}`

`\frac{2}{3}`

`\sqrt{2}`

`\sum_{i=1}^3`

`\sin \theta`

`\boxed{123}`

## Comments

Sort by:

TopNewestNote: $\displaystyle n! = \Gamma(n+1) = \int_{0}^{\infty}t^n e^{-t}dt$

$\begin{aligned} 0! = \Gamma(1) = \int_{0}^{\infty}t^0 e^{-t}dt &= \int_{0}^{\infty}e^{-t}dt \\ &= -e^{-t}\bigg|^{\infty}_{0} \\ &= -e^{-\infty} -(-e^0) = 0 + 1 = \boxed{1} \end{aligned}$

Log in to reply

Thanks for explanation.

Log in to reply

@Mahdi Raza

Log in to reply

0! = 1 :

1! = 1

2! = 1!*2

2! = 2

3! = 2!*3

3! = 6

4! = 3!*4

4! = 24

turn this around:

4! = 24

3! = 4!/4

3! = 6

2! = 3!/3

2! = 2

1! = 2!/2

1! = 1

0! = 1!/1

0! = 1

@SRIJAN Singh

Log in to reply

Yeah, same reason!

Log in to reply

Its the only proof I know for 0! @Mahdi Raza, do you know any others?

Log in to reply

$n \choose 0$. The ways of choosing 0 objects from a group of $n$ objects is $\boxed{1}$. Hence:

There was one related to$\begin{aligned} n \choose 0 &= \dfrac{n!}{(n-0)!0!} \\ \\ 1 &= \dfrac{n!}{n!0!} \\ \\ 0! &= \dfrac{\cancel{n!}}{\cancel{n!}} \\ \\ 0! &= \boxed{1} \end{aligned}$

Log in to reply

@Mahdi Raza, Thanks :)

CoolLog in to reply

Log in to reply

@Percy Jackson nice

Log in to reply

Thanks :)

Log in to reply

I assume the reader knows, about permutations and a little about factorials.

The formula for no. of permutations is ${ _{ n }{ P }_{ k } }=P(n,k)=\frac { n! }{ (n-k)! }$ or basically if we take any $k$ objects from $n$ objects at a time, then how many ways can the $k$ objects be arranged is the number of permutations.

So, if we take $n$ objects from $n$ objects and ask for the number of ways we can arrange them, basically we are asking how many ways can all the $n$ objects be arranged which by a primary definition of factorials is n! So using permutations we can write as,

$n!=\frac { n! }{ (n-n)! }$

Thus, $n!=\frac { n! }{ 0! }$

By simplifying, we get 0!=1.

Log in to reply

A common-sensical(Yeah, I just invented that word, deal with it) approach would be that 0! is 0 multiplied 0 times because 1 is greater than 0. 0 multiplied 0 times is $0^{0}$, aka 1 :) @SRIJAN Singh @Siddharth Chakravarty

Log in to reply

What do you even mean? I would suggest the common-sensical way, Lol that 0! Means how many ways can we arrange 0 objects which should be 1 i.e there is no way or to do nothing.

Log in to reply

$n! = n(n-1)(n-2) \ldots 1$ or $n!$ is product of all numbers less than n and greater than 1. There are 0 ways to reach 1 from 0 like that $0! = 0^{0} = 1$. THis is in a vague sense @Siddharth Chakravarty

Log in to reply

Log in to reply

For a (possibly) more intuitive explanation, recall that $n!$ may be interpreted as the number of ways to arrange $n$ distinct objects in a line.

For example, $2!=2$ and we can arrange $\square$ and $\blacksquare$ in 2 ways: $\square\blacksquare$ and $\blacksquare\square$.

$1!=1$, and there is one way to arrange the single item $\blacksquare$, like this: $\blacksquare$.

So $0!$ is the number of ways to arrange nothing. There is one way to arrange nothing in a line, like this:

So $0!=1$, though I admit that the interpretation of arranging "nothing" is a little philosophical.

Log in to reply

What's with the notifications? I got like 10 of them in this note, leading nowhere, are you guys sending and deleting comments @Siddharth Chakravarty and @SRIJAN Singh ????

Log in to reply

i got 34 comments a day

Log in to reply

did it ever go to 100+? I left brilliant for one day, I had 100+ notifications :)

Log in to reply

Log in to reply

@Yajat Shamji.do this

Log in to reply

@Mahdi Raza. do this

Log in to reply

@Siddharth Chakravarty @SRIJAN Singh -

## -_- Why are you making so many notifications and deleting your comments?!?!?!?!?!??!?!

Log in to reply

To trouble you. LOL :) Actually, I am not deleting @SRIJAN Singh did, he had the main comment.

Log in to reply

$\LARGE \textsf{Unsubscribe :)}$

Log in to reply

$\text{\large I think to do the same, but I am not doing, incase somebody comments something useful, notifications don't worry much}$

Log in to reply

$\Large \textsf{Why am I still getting notifications?}$

$\Large \textsf{I already Unsubbed this note.........}$

Log in to reply

Log in to reply

## ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................

Log in to reply

@Percy Jackson why are you making drawings of fullstop lol

Log in to reply

@Siddharth Chakravarty,@Percy Jackson because siddharth had given the answers that was asked by me

Log in to reply

Why delete comments then????????????????????????????????????????????

Log in to reply

i asked some of the questions like how was your naest exam and ask him to do my latest problems

Log in to reply

@Percy Jackson,@Siddharth Chakravarty.do this

Log in to reply

$n!$ is the number of ways you can order a set with $n$ elements, and the only way to order an empty set (with $0$ elements) is the empty set {} itself.

Log in to reply

...hi @SRIJAN Singh, you actually look pissed

What is going on with you both

(referring to NEED TO NOTIFY THE STAFF? COMMENT BELOW)If you feel this comment is offensive, I will delete this comment, k?

I just wanna know what's happening between you and Andrew

(yes, that is his name...)Log in to reply

nothin much he's tryin to become big daddy and treats me like i m his target idk why?

Log in to reply