This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science
related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should
explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments
should further the discussion of math and science.

When posting on Brilliant:

Use the emojis to react to an explanation, whether you're congratulating a job well done , or just really confused .

Ask specific questions about the challenge or the steps in somebody's explanation. Well-posed questions can add a lot to the discussion, but posting "I don't understand!" doesn't help anyone.

Try to contribute something new to the discussion, whether it is an extension, generalization or other idea related to the challenge.

Stay on topic — we're all here to learn more about math and science, not to hear about your favorite get-rich-quick scheme or current world events.

Markdown

Appears as

*italics* or _italics_

italics

**bold** or __bold__

bold

- bulleted - list

bulleted

list

1. numbered 2. list

numbered

list

Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly

While I really like the new format, I think the problems from those days were much better. I would be happy if 4-8 problems were given by the brilliant staff every week while maintaining the current format.

@Anubhav Singh
–
I can also slve lev 4 sums in this current format to increase my lev but I can't do them(so I don't deserve more than lev 3)... In this current format u can score a lot of points

Yes, I can recall,,, With 4 problems each every week, and next week new problems,, The discussions were given besides and on its top was the comparison bar,,, The most amazing thing was the leaderboard given bellow each section,, It was really a craze to see your name in top 10 or 20,,,,,,

It was incredible,seriously! I am in.But not just four problem ,A little bit more.I assume,could be good for everybody...I think-How old is BRILLIANT...

It has been mentioned in AoPS (and I totally agree with this) that the new format is way less instructive. In an attempt to make Brilliant less boring, I think the new site is more boring in that problem quality has sunk. There are many good things however as I have pointed out in an e-Mail to @Peter Taylor. I hope Brilliant can remind us of those gold old days again!

I personally like the really really old format - the one with only three categories ("Algebra and Number Theory", "Geometry and Combinatorics", and "Mechanics, Electricity, and Magnetism") and eight problems to solve per week - the best. There was no rating system; you leveled up by correctly answering 15 out of 16 problems within any given section. (I personally preferred this better, because nowadays it's so hard to level up that the average rating on problems now usually caps out at Level 4 which drags down user ratings overall. Also, you could get three tries and it wouldn't matter whether you used one try or all three to get the problem correct.)

Of course, this format has its benefits too, but, eh, to each his own.

Yes agreed ...... The previous format was well time bound and most important , MEASURABLE ! In the new format , there's no limitation and thus we don't get the feeling of contentment even if we solve 100 problems a day ... Previous format was cool and after completing the Weekly challenges this feeling of contentment was there ... Now though there are more problems and scope for users to submit problems , its not at all better than the previous !

Easy Math Editor

This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.

When posting on Brilliant:

`*italics*`

or`_italics_`

italics`**bold**`

or`__bold__`

boldNote: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctlyparagraph 1

paragraph 2

`[example link](https://brilliant.org)`

`> This is a quote`

Remember to wrap math in`\(`

...`\)`

or`\[`

...`\]`

to ensure proper formatting.`2 \times 3`

`2^{34}`

`a_{i-1}`

`\frac{2}{3}`

`\sqrt{2}`

`\sum_{i=1}^3`

`\sin \theta`

`\boxed{123}`

## Comments

Sort by:

TopNewestWhile I really like the new format, I think the problems from those days were much better. I would be happy if 4-8 problems were given by the brilliant staff every week while maintaining the current format.

Log in to reply

We should have the old format as the main page and be able to access the new format on a different page.

Log in to reply

I agree. This would probably be the best way to satisfy both parties.

Log in to reply

I completely agree with this.

Log in to reply

I agree.

Log in to reply

I agree.

Log in to reply

Firmly agrees.

Log in to reply

No.. the current one is better!

Log in to reply

Not at all

Log in to reply

U like 4 problems on each topic per week??...

Log in to reply

Log in to reply

Log in to reply

Log in to reply

Log in to reply

Log in to reply

Log in to reply

Log in to reply

Log in to reply

Log in to reply

The current one and the earlier one can coexist.

Log in to reply

Is this the old one,That one was amazing i really like that...

Log in to reply

Yes, I can recall,,, With 4 problems each every week, and next week new problems,, The discussions were given besides and on its top was the comparison bar,,, The most amazing thing was the leaderboard given bellow each section,, It was really a craze to see your name in top 10 or 20,,,,,,

Log in to reply

true

Log in to reply

It was incredible,seriously! I am in.But not just four problem ,A little bit more.I assume,could be good for everybody...I think-How old is BRILLIANT...

Log in to reply

100% in Favor..

Log in to reply

It has been mentioned in AoPS (and I totally agree with this) that the new format is way less instructive. In an attempt to make Brilliant less boring, I think the new site is more boring in that problem quality has sunk. There are many good things however as I have pointed out in an e-Mail to @Peter Taylor. I hope Brilliant can remind us of those gold old days again!

Log in to reply

My supports to you

Log in to reply

I suggested a new way to implement both formats. But so far staff did not respond.

Log in to reply

I like the old format. It's much harder to find good problems these days.

Log in to reply

Please see this!

Log in to reply

It's Good

Log in to reply

new rule for 100 points for each question should be changed and points should be according to the difficulty level of questions

Log in to reply

ME!

Log in to reply

yes!!

Log in to reply

I am in favour of the old format.

Log in to reply

The old format was several times better!!!!!!!

Log in to reply

I personally like the really really old format - the one with only three categories ("Algebra and Number Theory", "Geometry and Combinatorics", and "Mechanics, Electricity, and Magnetism") and eight problems to solve per week - the best. There was no rating system; you leveled up by correctly answering 15 out of 16 problems within any given section. (I personally preferred this better, because nowadays it's so hard to level up that the average rating on problems now usually caps out at Level 4 which drags down user ratings overall. Also, you could get three tries and it wouldn't matter whether you used one try or all three to get the problem correct.)

Of course, this format has its benefits too, but, eh, to each his own.

Log in to reply

the old page must be brought back

Log in to reply

It's been a year, but other people on Brilliant might want to see this.

Log in to reply

Hey....could u tell me about the previous format of brilliant??? I joined in jan and I don't know much abt it....

Log in to reply

See Dinesh Chavan's comment below.

Log in to reply

Or else Above

Log in to reply

Before few months,there were 4 weekly challenge for all topics .

Log in to reply

Weekly challenge as in???

Log in to reply

Yes agreed ...... The previous format was well time bound and most important , MEASURABLE ! In the new format , there's no limitation and thus we don't get the feeling of contentment even if we solve 100 problems a day ... Previous format was cool and after completing the Weekly challenges this feeling of contentment was there ... Now though there are more problems and scope for users to submit problems , its not at all better than the previous !

Log in to reply

What about a referendum to decide it?

Log in to reply

i think old one was a diamond and the present one is lead...

Log in to reply

@Anubhav Singh I am curious to know whose feed is this because the ratings are way good.

Log in to reply