# Imaginary Triangles

I almost posed this as a proper "Problem," but just couldn't bring myself to actually do so. I like it better as a jumping-off point for a discussion.

What is the area of a triangle whose sides have lengths $3+i$, $3+2i$ and $4-3i$?

Yes, it's a little ridiculous, but that's intentional. After all, we mathematicians, like the White Queen in Through the Looking-Glass, sometimes like to believe "six impossible things before breakfast."

Is it possible to make any sense out of such a question? Is there an answer? What does it mean?

What other questions do you find yourself asking? Note by Matt Enlow
7 years, 6 months ago

This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.

When posting on Brilliant:

• Use the emojis to react to an explanation, whether you're congratulating a job well done , or just really confused .
• Ask specific questions about the challenge or the steps in somebody's explanation. Well-posed questions can add a lot to the discussion, but posting "I don't understand!" doesn't help anyone.
• Try to contribute something new to the discussion, whether it is an extension, generalization or other idea related to the challenge.

MarkdownAppears as
*italics* or _italics_ italics
**bold** or __bold__ bold
- bulleted- list
• bulleted
• list
1. numbered2. list
1. numbered
2. list
Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly
paragraph 1paragraph 2

paragraph 1

paragraph 2

[example link](https://brilliant.org)example link
> This is a quote
This is a quote
    # I indented these lines
# 4 spaces, and now they show
# up as a code block.

print "hello world"
# I indented these lines
# 4 spaces, and now they show
# up as a code block.

print "hello world"
MathAppears as
Remember to wrap math in $$ ... $$ or $ ... $ to ensure proper formatting.
2 \times 3 $2 \times 3$
2^{34} $2^{34}$
a_{i-1} $a_{i-1}$
\frac{2}{3} $\frac{2}{3}$
\sqrt{2} $\sqrt{2}$
\sum_{i=1}^3 $\sum_{i=1}^3$
\sin \theta $\sin \theta$
\boxed{123} $\boxed{123}$

Sort by:

Well, it works out nicely if you use Heron's Formula.

Note that, the Semi perimeter ($\displaystyle s$) is real, i.e,

$\displaystyle s = \frac{a+b+c}{2} = \frac{(3+i)+(3+2i)+(4-3i)}{2} = 5$

Using Heron's Formula,
$A = \sqrt{s(s-a)(s-b)(s-c)} = \sqrt{5(2-i)(2-2i)(1+3i)} = \sqrt{100} = \boxed{10}$ sq.units

I think that this is wonderful.
Maybe, this will lead to new breed of complex numbers that have this unusual property.
I can't make more sense of it than that.

- 7 years, 6 months ago

YEAH DID THE SAME

- 7 years, 5 months ago

MADE A SLIGHT MISTAKE$\sqrt{100}= \boxed{10}$

- 7 years, 5 months ago

Can anyone else find triples of complex side lengths that give a "triangle" with real area? Must the semi-perimeter be real for this to happen?

- 7 years, 5 months ago

Sure, (1+i) + (1+i) + (-1+i) = 1+3i, which is an imaginary perimeter, but has an area of (1/2)√5

- 7 years, 5 months ago

Alright, I found a triangle that has real area, but unfortunately it turned out to be zero.

Consider,
Sides : $\displaystyle 3+2i,2+i$ and $\displaystyle 1+i$

Note that,
Semi perimeter $\displaystyle = s = \frac{(3+2i)+(2+i)+(1+i)}{2} = 3+2i$

It is clear that,
since $\displaystyle s = a$, we get,
Area $\displaystyle = \sqrt{s(s-a)(s-b)(s-c)} = \boxed{0}$

Hence,
we can always find 3 complex side lengths that give a triangle with real area.

- 7 years, 5 months ago

Also note that, the semi perimeter is not real, it is complex.

- 7 years, 5 months ago

The area is zero because $3+2i = (2+i) + (1+i)$.

A triangle with sides $(\alpha + \beta ; \; \alpha ; \; \beta)$ will always have no area.

- 7 years, 5 months ago

Interesting that that is a property that continues to hold when we expand into the complex numbers: If one side is the sum of two others, then the area of the triangle is zero. It's clear why this is the case, though, if we examine Heron's Formula.

- 7 years, 5 months ago

By using the Law of Cosines, we can also prove that for any sides a, b, c, real or complex, the sum of the angles always add up to 180°, even if the angles themselves are complex. It's a bit tedious, but it does work out.

- 7 years, 5 months ago

I don't think that the area of a triangle with complex numbers having non-zero imaginary part being its sides make any sense because in order to find the area, we basically use Heron's Formula. And if you have proved it, you would know that all in all it demands Cosine Rule which in turn has to be proved geometrically. And in order to prove it geometrically, you need to now where the sides of triangle are, what's the angle between them, etc. But complex sides are against it. I think, this is enough to conclude that area of triangle formed by a random triple of complex numbers doesn't make any sense. Anyways, one can always find many triples which when put into the expression of Heron's Formula result in a Real number.

- 7 years, 5 months ago

This doesn't convince me. It feels like the same logic could be applied to things like complex exponentiation: Since the concept of exponentiation first came about in the context of real numbers (or, really, positive integers), you could say that it doesn't make sense when applied to complex numbers. But we know that's not true; there is a way to "bestow" meaning upon things like $2^i$, typically by way of motions in the complex plane.

So I would start thinking about this this way... Typically the side lengths entered in Heron's Formula represent distances. Is there a way to conceive of the notion of "distance" that allows for complex numbers? Perhaps we could start more conservatively and ask whether there is a way to conceive of "distance" so that it includes negative real numbers. And there does exist a notion of directed distance. Could that be extended further?

And so on...

- 7 years, 5 months ago

The area would be 10. Everything that is true about geometry and algebra using real numbers is also true using complex numbers, except for ordering (such as inequalities). We simply use Heron's formula to finding the area of a triangle, given its sides.

- 7 years, 6 months ago

So are you saying that, in particular, there can be no "Triangle Inequality" for complex-sided triangles?

- 7 years, 6 months ago

That's what I'm saying. That's the one thing we'd have to give up, we wouldn't be able to say that x is greater than y, whatever x and y might be, lengths, areas, angles, etc.

- 7 years, 6 months ago

are you all saying that there exist a triangle whose sides dont exst but area exists?

- 7 years, 5 months ago

I guess it depends on what you mean by "exist"! After all, one could argue that, for example, "a 3-4-5 triangle" does not exist. We could draw or build physical representations of a 3-4-5 triangle, but they would all be inaccurate/imperfect. Yet we can still talk about the properties of such a triangle in a way that makes sense.

If by "exists" you mean "has a way to measure it that corresponds to a positive real number," then... yes. That is what we're saying. :-)

- 7 years, 5 months ago

In a way, this illustrates the fact we don't need diagrams to demonstrate geometrical theorems, provided it doesn't involve ordering. A blind man or an alien with no concept of sight or figures will still be able to understand geometrical theorems purely on algebraic grounds. I believe the mathematician Laplace preferred not using diagrams at all in his works, as he considered them to be misleading.

- 7 years, 5 months ago

Could it represent a triangle with side lengths that oscillate in time or space ? Possibly, the alternative representation would have been random and without any pattern

- 7 years, 5 months ago

One application area that comes to mind is those of mechanisms , especially if we consider not the link lengths but the distance of the vertices from a fixed point. Other illustrative related areas include coupled oscillators, molecular chemistry (the length of the bonds etc)

- 7 years, 5 months ago

The question is that, can lengths be imaginary. Not sure, but maybe this could be explained with a little bit of physics and higher maths (existence of a figure simultaneously in different dimensions and therefore the concept of complex). But first what is a complex point. How to "see" it? These fundamental questions could provide meaning to the answer. I don't know how rational I am while writing this comment but anyways, that's what I was thinking while trying to get some meaning out of the question!

- 7 years, 4 months ago