Recently, a comment made by Matt Parker on a Numberphile video made me start to think about the implications of positive infinity equaling negative infinity.

First off, what would the number line look like? If +=+\infty=-\infty, then we could represent the number line as a number "circle", with both ends wrapping around to meet at the single point of infinity, like this:

This already feels very intuitive, because an infinite distance from 00, whether you go in one direction or the other, seems as if it should be treated as just one distance: infinity.

But things get even more interesting!

How would a coordinate plane look if +=+\infty=-\infty? I propose that it would look like a torus:

At first this may seem confusing, but there is a reason I chose the torus over what might seem more natural: a sphere.

On a sphere, both the xx and yy axes would intersect at a single point of infinity. However, there are 33 combinations of 00 and \infty which must be accounted for: (0,0)(0, 0), (0,)(0, \infty), and (,)(\infty, \infty). A sphere would not be able to distinguish between these 33 points, whereas a torus could. These points are all labelled in the picture above.

One of the exciting results of this model is that division by zero now becomes defined.

A common example of division by zero being undefined is the graph of the function f(x)=1xf(x) = \frac{1}{x}. The graph is shown below:

As this function's input gets closer to 00 from the right (the function getting closer to 10\frac{1}{0}), its output approaches ++\infty, but as its input gets closer to 00 from the left, its output approaches -\infty. Thus, on a coordinate plane, division by zero is undefined, since this graph doesn't approach one value for 10\frac{1}{0}.

But on a coordinate torus, this would not be an issue. Excluding the torus shape for clarity, the graph of the function f(x)=10f(x) = \frac{1}{0} would look like this:

Not only does this graph define division by zero since it approaches infinity from both directions, but it just looks beautiful! :):)

I should note that the reason infinity is not commonly treated in this way is because it violates the axioms which make number sets such as the real numbers what is called a field. This means that infinity breaks the rules of arithmetic such as addition and multiplication so that proper algebra cannot be done with it.

However, I would propose that we adopt a single infinity into our fields and treat it in a special way, the way in which I have described above.

I should also note that the concept of a number "circle" and a coordinate "torus" only exist in infinity. On a finite level, all we can see is a number line and a coordinate plane. Notwithstanding this, it is still fun and practical to contemplate properties which only exist in infinity.

Does anyone else have any thoughts on the subject? I would love to hear them!

Note by David Stiff
1 week, 6 days ago

No vote yet
1 vote

  Easy Math Editor

This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.

When posting on Brilliant:

  • Use the emojis to react to an explanation, whether you're congratulating a job well done , or just really confused .
  • Ask specific questions about the challenge or the steps in somebody's explanation. Well-posed questions can add a lot to the discussion, but posting "I don't understand!" doesn't help anyone.
  • Try to contribute something new to the discussion, whether it is an extension, generalization or other idea related to the challenge.
  • Stay on topic — we're all here to learn more about math and science, not to hear about your favorite get-rich-quick scheme or current world events.

MarkdownAppears as
*italics* or _italics_ italics
**bold** or __bold__ bold

- bulleted
- list

  • bulleted
  • list

1. numbered
2. list

  1. numbered
  2. list
Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly
paragraph 1

paragraph 2

paragraph 1

paragraph 2

[example link](https://brilliant.org)example link
> This is a quote
This is a quote
    # I indented these lines
    # 4 spaces, and now they show
    # up as a code block.

    print "hello world"
# I indented these lines
# 4 spaces, and now they show
# up as a code block.

print "hello world"
MathAppears as
Remember to wrap math in \( ... \) or \[ ... \] to ensure proper formatting.
2 \times 3 2×3 2 \times 3
2^{34} 234 2^{34}
a_{i-1} ai1 a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3} 23 \frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2} 2 \sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3 i=13 \sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta sinθ \sin \theta
\boxed{123} 123 \boxed{123}


Sort by:

Top Newest

Well, thats very interesting! Maybe you could build a field of numbers which includes infinity. I don't know how to do this, but I think this should be possible. I mean, the imaginary unit is just a special "number" which was pressed in the real numbers to get the complex ones ( to say it in the most unformal way ;) ). Even If you need to redefine the term field, I think it is possible. It took over 100 years to accept the complex numbers - So why shouldn't our childs accept this idea one day.

CodeCrafter 1 - 1 week, 4 days ago

Log in to reply

Thanks for the encouragement! :)

Unfortunately, based on my very limited knowledge of algebraic abstractions, I believe the way mathematicians have defined a "field" makes adding infinity to one impossible. But maybe there's a different type of abstraction which would work...

Great, now I'm going to have to research this! :)

David Stiff - 1 week, 3 days ago

Log in to reply


Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...