I think a more interesting question is, given the set of all positive rationals from 0 to 1, say that the number of the elements in this set is n. Then what is 1/n of the sum of all of them? I don't have an answer to that one yet, I'll think about it when I get the time. I know that (1/n) of the sum 1 + 1/2 + 1/3 + ... + 1/n has the limiting value of 0 as n -> ∞.

Wouldn't this be 1/2 ? We could pair each rational number x (other than 1/2) with (1 - x); then the sum would be lim(n->infinity)[(1/n)(((n-1)/2) + (1/2))] = lim(n->infinity)((1/n)(n/2)) = 1/2.

Sure they can all be added up. It's an infinite sum. See harmonic sums, like 1/2 + 1/3 + 1/4 + ... etc. Of course, Gaussian rationals can't be included in this sum because "less than 1" has no meaning for complex numbers.

Easy Math Editor

`*italics*`

or`_italics_`

italics`**bold**`

or`__bold__`

boldNote: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctlyparagraph 1

paragraph 2

`[example link](https://brilliant.org)`

`> This is a quote`

Remember to wrap math in \( ... \) or \[ ... \] to ensure proper formatting.`2 \times 3`

`2^{34}`

`a_{i-1}`

`\frac{2}{3}`

`\sqrt{2}`

`\sum_{i=1}^3`

`\sin \theta`

`\boxed{123}`

## Comments

Sort by:

TopNewestI think a more interesting question is, given the set of all positive rationals from 0 to 1, say that the number of the elements in this set is n. Then what is 1/n of the sum of all of them? I don't have an answer to that one yet, I'll think about it when I get the time. I know that (1/n) of the sum 1 + 1/2 + 1/3 + ... + 1/n has the limiting value of 0 as n -> ∞.

Log in to reply

Wouldn't this be 1/2 ? We could pair each rational number x (other than 1/2) with (1 - x); then the sum would be lim(n->infinity)[(1/n)

(((n-1)/2) + (1/2))] = lim(n->infinity)((1/n)(n/2)) = 1/2.Log in to reply

Sure they can all be added up. It's an infinite sum. See harmonic sums, like 1/2 + 1/3 + 1/4 + ... etc. Of course, Gaussian rationals can't be included in this sum because "less than 1" has no meaning for complex numbers.

Log in to reply

But how?

Log in to reply