Waste less time on Facebook — follow Brilliant.
×

Irrational Math…

No number is equal to any other no. except itself Stupid statement, isn't it?? Well, you might think that I declare it as stupid, and it is accepted worldwide. But here… Take a rational x and its negative,i.e., -x. Square them, and they becomex^{2}. Now, They are equal. Hence, taking square root on both sides, we get: X=-X Hence, disproved

Note by Vikram Venkat
3 years ago

No vote yet
1 vote

  Easy Math Editor

MarkdownAppears as
*italics* or _italics_ italics
**bold** or __bold__ bold

- bulleted
- list

  • bulleted
  • list

1. numbered
2. list

  1. numbered
  2. list
Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly
paragraph 1

paragraph 2

paragraph 1

paragraph 2

[example link](https://brilliant.org)example link
> This is a quote
This is a quote
    # I indented these lines
    # 4 spaces, and now they show
    # up as a code block.

    print "hello world"
# I indented these lines
# 4 spaces, and now they show
# up as a code block.

print "hello world"
MathAppears as
Remember to wrap math in \( ... \) or \[ ... \] to ensure proper formatting.
2 \times 3 \( 2 \times 3 \)
2^{34} \( 2^{34} \)
a_{i-1} \( a_{i-1} \)
\frac{2}{3} \( \frac{2}{3} \)
\sqrt{2} \( \sqrt{2} \)
\sum_{i=1}^3 \( \sum_{i=1}^3 \)
\sin \theta \( \sin \theta \)
\boxed{123} \( \boxed{123} \)

Comments

Sort by:

Top Newest

u should go a bit deeper inside ur proof .....for a correct mathematical proof i think counts in it all the possible perspstives .....:-)

Tanmay Goyal - 2 years, 10 months ago

Log in to reply

Well, the proof is never the basis. I am waiting for a counter-statement

Vikram Venkat - 2 years, 9 months ago

Log in to reply

Just look here my friend

Let's oversimplify it ,

x^2=x^2 1st condition ,

xx=xx

2nd condition,

(-x) *(-x) = x * x

Now , you divide the whole equation by x, you see

x=x , you can only remove x from the equation not ( -1)*(-1)

That's why I said you should consider all possible perspectives ..!!

Tanmay Goyal - 2 years, 9 months ago

Log in to reply

There is no such number where its predecessor or its successor is the negative value of itself, just looking at the number 1, it has a predecessor of 0, and a successor of 2, neither equaling -1.

Brice Kessler - 3 years ago

Log in to reply

Have a good look at it bro!!!

Vikram Venkat - 2 years, 12 months ago

Log in to reply

be careful with squares and square roots , think once again for a while

U Z - 2 years, 11 months ago

Log in to reply

@U Z What happened @megh choksi ???

Vikram Venkat - 2 years, 10 months ago

Log in to reply

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...