Is 2=1 Possible?

Once my teacher gave a proof of 2=1 which is as follow:

{ 1 }^{ 2 }\quad =\quad 1\\ { 2 }^{ 2 }\quad =\quad 2\quad +\quad 2\\ { 3 }^{ 2 }\quad =\quad 3\quad +\quad 3\quad +\quad 3\\ .\\ .\\ .\\ .\\ .\\ { x }^{ 2 }\quad =\quad x\quad +\quad x\quad +\quad x\quad +\quad ........\quad upto\quad x\quad terms.\\ \\ Now\quad differentiating\quad both\quad sides\quad w.r.t\quad x,\\ 2x\quad =\quad 1\quad +\quad 1\quad +\quad 1\quad +\quad ........\quad upto\quad x\quad terms\\ ie,\quad 2x\quad =\quad x\\ \quad \quad \boxed { { 2\quad =\quad 1 } }

Now we were challenged to find the flaw in this proof ( Which we won )

Can you find the flaw in this proof ???

Note by Shravan Jain
5 years, 7 months ago

No vote yet
1 vote

  Easy Math Editor

This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.

When posting on Brilliant:

  • Use the emojis to react to an explanation, whether you're congratulating a job well done , or just really confused .
  • Ask specific questions about the challenge or the steps in somebody's explanation. Well-posed questions can add a lot to the discussion, but posting "I don't understand!" doesn't help anyone.
  • Try to contribute something new to the discussion, whether it is an extension, generalization or other idea related to the challenge.
  • Stay on topic — we're all here to learn more about math and science, not to hear about your favorite get-rich-quick scheme or current world events.

MarkdownAppears as
*italics* or _italics_ italics
**bold** or __bold__ bold

- bulleted
- list

  • bulleted
  • list

1. numbered
2. list

  1. numbered
  2. list
Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly
paragraph 1

paragraph 2

paragraph 1

paragraph 2

[example link](https://brilliant.org)example link
> This is a quote
This is a quote
    # I indented these lines
    # 4 spaces, and now they show
    # up as a code block.

    print "hello world"
# I indented these lines
# 4 spaces, and now they show
# up as a code block.

print "hello world"
MathAppears as
Remember to wrap math in \( ... \) or \[ ... \] to ensure proper formatting.
2 \times 3 2×3 2 \times 3
2^{34} 234 2^{34}
a_{i-1} ai1 a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3} 23 \frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2} 2 \sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3 i=13 \sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta sinθ \sin \theta
\boxed{123} 123 \boxed{123}

Comments

Sort by:

Top Newest

Sincexcantakeonlypositiveintegralvalues(as1thterm,0thterm,0.5thtermdoesnotexists),thefunctionx2isdiscontinuousandthusisnondifferentiable. Since\quad x\quad can\quad take\quad only\quad positive\quad integral\quad values\quad \\ (as\quad { -1 }^{ th }\quad term,\quad { 0 }^{ th }\quad term,\quad { 0.5 }^{ th }\quad term\quad does\quad not\quad exists),\quad \\ the\quad function\quad { x }^{ 2 }\quad is\quad discontinuous\quad \\ and\quad thus\quad is\quad non\quad differentiable.

Shravan Jain - 5 years, 7 months ago

Log in to reply

Thank you for posting this question.

You're trying to use the equality:

x2=x+x+...+x{x}^{2} = x + x + ... + x

You are trying to differentiate two functions. Let's see what we know about them.

Let f(x)=x2f(x)={x}^{2}. The domain for this function is clearly RR. And yeah when we differentiate we get f(x)=2xf'(x)=2x.

Let g(x)=x+x+...+xg(x)= x + x + ... + x (for the equality to be true x repeats in the sum exactly x times), then since a number can't repeat itself 2\sqrt { 2 } times the domain of this function is NN.

Now you differentiate. Tell me how you can calculate:

g(x0)=limxx0g(x)g(x0)xx0g'\left( { x }_{ 0 } \right) =\lim _{ x\rightarrow { x }_{ 0 } }{ \frac { g\left( x \right) -g\left( { x }_{ 0 } \right) }{ x-{ x }_{ 0 } } }

But you can't approach x0{ x } _ { 0 } on NN. You can only differentiate on intervals or RR.

More than this the differentiation gives you the slope of the tangent in x0{ x } _ { 0 }, but you can't have a slope to a function that's made of dots.

Even if we took ff defined on NN we still wouldn't have been able to differentiate it either.

So no, 2 isn't 1.

Adrian Neacșu - 5 years, 6 months ago

Log in to reply

Well the you only differentiated the x's,the number of x's should also be differentiated as it is also a variable

Murlidhar Sharma - 5 years, 7 months ago

Log in to reply

Since this function is non differentiable , there is no question of differentiating the no. of x's

Shravan Jain - 5 years, 7 months ago

Log in to reply

Well,I dint even consider that lol

Murlidhar Sharma - 5 years, 7 months ago

Log in to reply

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...