Here is a proof that \(\log{2}\) = 0. This is not true but can you spot the wrong step in it.

\[\displaystyle \log(1 + x) = \sum_{i = 1}^{\infty}{\dfrac{(-1)^k x^k}{k}} = x - \frac{x^2}{2} + \frac{x^3}{3} - \frac{x^4}{4} + \frac{x^5}{5} - \frac{x^6}{6} + \dots \dots \\ \text{Putting x = 1} \\ \log{2} = 1 - \frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{3} - \frac{1}{4} + \frac{1}{5} - \frac{1}{6} + \dots \dots \\ \log{2} = 1 + \frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{3} + \frac{1}{4} + \frac{1}{5} + \dots - 2\left(\frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{4} + \frac{1}{6} + \frac{1}{8} + \frac{1}{10} + \dots \right) \\ \log{2} = \zeta(1) - \frac{2}{2}\left( 1 + \frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{3} + \frac{1}{4} + \frac{1}{5} + \dots \right) \\ \log{2} = \zeta(1) - \zeta(1) \\ \log{2} = \boxed{0} \\ \textbf{Hence Proved} \]

No vote yet

1 vote

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...

Easy Math Editor

`*italics*`

or`_italics_`

italics`**bold**`

or`__bold__`

boldNote: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctlyparagraph 1

paragraph 2

`[example link](https://brilliant.org)`

`> This is a quote`

Remember to wrap math in \( ... \) or \[ ... \] to ensure proper formatting.`2 \times 3`

`2^{34}`

`a_{i-1}`

`\frac{2}{3}`

`\sqrt{2}`

`\sum_{i=1}^3`

`\sin \theta`

`\boxed{123}`

## Comments

Sort by:

TopNewest\(\zeta(1) = \infty \)

\(\displaystyle \zeta(1) - \zeta(1) = \infty - \infty \neq 0\)

Log in to reply

Yeah, absolutely right.

Log in to reply

Thanks !

Log in to reply

\( \zeta(1) \) does not converge. So the statement \( \zeta (1) - \zeta (1) =0 \) is like saying \( \infty - \infty = 0\) which is wrong because it is indeterminate.

Log in to reply

Thanks !

Log in to reply

Watch the limits in which the Taylor series converges. We are given that \( | x | < 1 \), and hence we cannot apply this to the case where \( x = 1 \) or \( x = -1 \), to find the value of \( \log 2 \) or \( \log 0 \).

Similarly, we cannot apply the Geometric Progression sum of \( \frac{1}{1-x} = 1 + x + x^2 + x^3 + \ldots \) to conclude that \( \frac{1}{0} = 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + \ldots \) or that \( \frac{1}{2} = 1 - 1 + 1 - 1 + \ldots \), because \( x = 1, -1 \) are out of the range in which the formula applies.

Log in to reply

Thanks a Lot

Log in to reply

Alternatively, this works as a proof that the harmonic series diverges.

Log in to reply

@Sandeep Bhardwaj @Calvin Lin @Ronak Agarwal @Mvs Saketh @Azhaghu Roopesh M

Log in to reply

Rajdeep did u understand all this??? It was really out of my mind!!

Log in to reply

I came up with this proof.

Log in to reply

Comment deleted Apr 14, 2015

Log in to reply

Comment deleted Apr 14, 2015

Log in to reply

Comment deleted Apr 14, 2015

Log in to reply

Comment deleted Apr 14, 2015

Log in to reply

Log in to reply

Log in to reply

Log in to reply

Log in to reply

Log in to reply

@Manish Dash you are a total genius. In Open proof contest can I send snapshots or a word file.

Yep! I totally agree withLog in to reply

Log in to reply