I recently came in pocession of a fereign currency coin which seemed to be biased(to heads say). On noticing that the coin seemed asymmetric, I set up the experiment and started tossing the coin. Here is how things went :

after 2 coin tosses: 2H, 0T : Prob(H) =1

after 30 coin tosses: 15H, 15T : Prob(H) = .5

after 3000 coin tosses : 1492H, 1508T : Prob(H) = .497333333333333333333333333333

Now to state the obvious, the first result was a joke. In the third case, notice how I've conveniently written the number to more than 10 places of decimal. At some point, I had to stop and think, does it make any sense to claim the number to 10 places of decimal with just 3000 observations?

One thing I could agree upon was that, higher the number of observations, higher is the precision, but how much?

I guess I want to quantify precision as a function of number of observations.

Please share your thoughts on the problem, any suggestion would be appreciated.

No vote yet

1 vote

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...

Easy Math Editor

`*italics*`

or`_italics_`

italics`**bold**`

or`__bold__`

boldNote: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctlyparagraph 1

paragraph 2

`[example link](https://brilliant.org)`

`> This is a quote`

Remember to wrap math in \( ... \) or \[ ... \] to ensure proper formatting.`2 \times 3`

`2^{34}`

`a_{i-1}`

`\frac{2}{3}`

`\sqrt{2}`

`\sum_{i=1}^3`

`\sin \theta`

`\boxed{123}`

## Comments

There are no comments in this discussion.