Lets use a Super-Calculator ! eπ163=e^{\pi\sqrt{163}}= Integer ?

To see if you qualify :- (Irrational)Irrational=IrrationalA. TrueB. FalseC. Unpredictable !(\text{Irrational})^{\text{Irrational}}=\text{Irrational} \\ \text{A. True} \quad \text{B. False} \quad \text{C. Unpredictable !}

Ok. Fine ! Now what will be your reaction if you come out to know that eπ163e^{\pi\sqrt{163}} is an integer. (waiting for your GIFs about your reaction). Don't you feel it strange that three irrational numbers ee , π\pi and 163\sqrt{163} can be combined to form an integer ?


In fact, the Indian Mathematician Srinivasa Ramanujan (1888-1920) first conjectured that eπ163e^{\pi\sqrt{163}} was an integer. He felt he found its value to be : 262537412640768743.999.......262537412640768743.999.......


In 1972, computers had carried it out to 2 million places of 9's, but to be an integer one must know it repeats forever.

So, if 9 repeats forever, then eπ163e^{\pi\sqrt{163}} will be equal to 262537412640768744262537412640768744

Now let me know if you're enough convinced to try to figure out its exact value !!!


Leave your amazing comments & ideas here. and Keep Exploring the Universe of Mathematics.

Note by Sandeep Bhardwaj
4 years, 6 months ago

No vote yet
1 vote

  Easy Math Editor

This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.

When posting on Brilliant:

  • Use the emojis to react to an explanation, whether you're congratulating a job well done , or just really confused .
  • Ask specific questions about the challenge or the steps in somebody's explanation. Well-posed questions can add a lot to the discussion, but posting "I don't understand!" doesn't help anyone.
  • Try to contribute something new to the discussion, whether it is an extension, generalization or other idea related to the challenge.
  • Stay on topic — we're all here to learn more about math and science, not to hear about your favorite get-rich-quick scheme or current world events.

MarkdownAppears as
*italics* or _italics_ italics
**bold** or __bold__ bold

- bulleted
- list

  • bulleted
  • list

1. numbered
2. list

  1. numbered
  2. list
Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly
paragraph 1

paragraph 2

paragraph 1

paragraph 2

[example link](https://brilliant.org)example link
> This is a quote
This is a quote
    # I indented these lines
    # 4 spaces, and now they show
    # up as a code block.

    print "hello world"
# I indented these lines
# 4 spaces, and now they show
# up as a code block.

print "hello world"
MathAppears as
Remember to wrap math in \( ... \) or \[ ... \] to ensure proper formatting.
2 \times 3 2×3 2 \times 3
2^{34} 234 2^{34}
a_{i-1} ai1 a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3} 23 \frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2} 2 \sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3 i=13 \sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta sinθ \sin \theta
\boxed{123} 123 \boxed{123}

Comments

Sort by:

Top Newest

I am astonishment! I NEVER knew that eπ163\displaystyle { e }^{ \pi \sqrt { 163 } } could be an integer. I have so much to learn about mathematics. This is a perfect example of how simple intuition leads you astray. Can't trust your intuition, ya gotta do the math and work out all those decimals after the ...8743.999......8743.999...

Meanwhile, no, it's not true that (Irrational)Irrational=Irrational{ \left( Irrational \right) }^{ Irrational }=Irrational is always true. To see why, let xx be an unknown. Then we solve for xx the equation xx=2{ x }^{ x }=2\quad or any other such rational number besides 22. Then in nearly all cases, xx is not rational.

For a fascinating insight into this factoid, look up "Heegner Numbers" and check out Ramanujan's contribution to it.

Michael Mendrin - 4 years, 6 months ago

Log in to reply

I am astonishment! I NEVER knew that eπ163√ could be an integer.

Is this sarcasm? Because it isn't an integer and Poe's law.

Siddhartha Srivastava - 4 years, 6 months ago

Log in to reply

Siddhartha, that was pretty cool, this is the first time I've heard of Poe's Law. It's right on target! Let me offer a corollary to Poe's Law, which is that no matter how outrageous or silly a politician's or pundit's statements may be, there will always be lots of people that believe them wholeheartedly.

Still, Heegner's numbers, to me, is a pretty fascinating subject. Heegner Number

Also here too Heegner Number

I really like the lineup of this very finite sequence of nine Heegner numbers

1,2,3,7,11,19,43,67,1631, 2, 3, 7, 11, 19, 43, 67, 163

Michael Mendrin - 4 years, 6 months ago

Log in to reply

@Michael Mendrin What's the proof that there are only 9 of them?

Kartik Sharma - 4 years, 6 months ago

Log in to reply

@Kartik Sharma Look up Stark-Heegner Theorem What's interesting is that Carl Gauss as far back in the 19th century had conjectured that there would only be a finite number of them. But it took about a century to prove it, and another half century for other mathematicians to finally accept Heegner's 1952 proof of it, after it was upgraded by Stark in 1969. This has had a long history with a number of luminaries having worked on it, almost like Fermat's Last Theorem.

Michael Mendrin - 4 years, 6 months ago

Log in to reply

@Michael Mendrin That's interesting!

Kartik Sharma - 4 years, 6 months ago

Log in to reply

Very interesting

Arunesh Kumar - 4 years, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

Wow!!

Akshat Sharda - 4 years, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...