Ever wondered what every average human thinks when looking at non-arithmetic M@H?

Now I challenge YOU to make the craziest possible math problem EVER!!!

Here are the rules:

No words: introductions, if-then's, assumptions, ... Exception: you may use words briefly for definitions, but make sure to MINIMIZE the usage - i.e. use math language instead where possible (# vs. number, etc.)

One part of the problem must be solvable by > 90% of the masses (such as 1+1=2)

Must be visually terrorizing

Must be mentally terrorizing

Post links below for your submissions of the craziest math problem. The contest will be judged by votes: majority rule. Downvotes allowed. I will post a congratulation note to the winner along with the link to the problem. Hopefully it will be powered by re-shares from the big boys (Calvin).

The contest begin today and ends August 1st.

\[\huge{\text{GO MAD-M@H CRAZY!!!}}\]

No vote yet

1 vote

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...

Easy Math Editor

`*italics*`

or`_italics_`

italics`**bold**`

or`__bold__`

boldNote: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctlyparagraph 1

paragraph 2

`[example link](https://brilliant.org)`

`> This is a quote`

Remember to wrap math in \( ... \) or \[ ... \] to ensure proper formatting.`2 \times 3`

`2^{34}`

`a_{i-1}`

`\frac{2}{3}`

`\sqrt{2}`

`\sum_{i=1}^3`

`\sin \theta`

`\boxed{123}`

## Comments

Sort by:

TopNewest\(n\) is a positive non-zero integer. Solve for \(n\). Clues for this one can be found in one of my notes.

You may use a computer.

Log in to reply

Woops I past my deadline, lol. Apparently the only downvote you got was from me ^.^ Well, could you please provide me with the LaTeX of the problem, or is that its best rendering over there?

Log in to reply

If you copy and paste the image, it can be enlarged nicely, with little loss of detail. But I suggest you first have a look at my messageboard to get a hint how to solve this.

Michael Mendrin's Messageboard

To actually try to compute this expression, even with a computer and math software, is a fairly formidable task.

Log in to reply

So, what do you think about my precious new VE about derivatives?

Log in to reply

Given that it's not realistic for anyone to do my problem without first knowing its antecedents, I'd vote for yours.

Log in to reply

Log in to reply

Edit: Okay, see my first comments on this

VE

By the way, "VE" to someone like me means "Victory in Europe". I think one has to be really old to get this.

Log in to reply

Meh. Looks lazy and repetitive. Lots of white space.

Not scary.

(Just my opinion ^.^)

Log in to reply

Yours doesn't have much white space in the same way graffiti art doesn't leave much room for white space. But what do I know about art? It's just an opinion. Hoo-hah.

Log in to reply

But... I can't promise my problem is harder if we remove the bottom-most fraction. Everything is simply simplification, that's all. Kk I'ma back away into my corner now...

Log in to reply

Log in to reply

\[|x|<0\]

Log in to reply

Poon, algebras with negative norms is a thing. It's not true that \(|x|<0\) is a mathematical impossibility. Here's a paper discussing spinors and Clifford algebras, both of which play prominent roles in theoretical physics

The Construction of Spinors in Geometric Algebra

On pages 2 and 6, it speaks of vectors of negative norms. This is not an isolated instance. What makes this paper slightly different from most other papers on mathematical physics is that the construction of the relevant Clifford algebra for spinors

usesthe utility of vectors of negative norms. Most other physics papers that run into negative norms complain about how they keep cropping up like weeds, and they talk about how to get rid of them because they seem to suggest physical nonsense--like negative energy and negative distance. Kind of like how that black, sticky goo that sometimes came out of the ground back before the 19th century was considered to be an odious nuisance best to be gotten rid of. But, mathematically speaking, "negative norms" are not un-mathematical.Log in to reply

Maaan... how many courses do I need to take to understand that lol

Though on the other hand I feel like I'm beyond this stuff and just feel intimidated by the notations or am just lazy ;p

Log in to reply

Log in to reply

^.^

Log in to reply

\(\color{white}{\text{Too scary! OMG! Save me!}}\)

Log in to reply

O_o...

You're onto something.

Log in to reply

It must look crazier than this!:

Here is my submission (without math-speak). GO BEAT IT!

Log in to reply

I cannot recommend this idea.

Words taken away from math is just Kaboobly doo, like life taken away from a person would just be a bag of chemicals. The essence of mathematics is in its beauty and simplicity, not to scare the damn out of people.

Personally, I've no idea what joy a sane mathematician would get out of solving your problem

Log in to reply

The point is not to make it "right," or even elegant. The point is to make the most crazy-looking problem you can, so that it intimidates the neurons out of those who look at it (besides the math pros).

Log in to reply

I agree that what the world needs are sane mathematicians.

Log in to reply

doodly-do badoodlydodololodoodo

Log in to reply

I'm still waiting for a solution to this problem!

Log in to reply

I have all of it besides the bottom fraction. I lost the notebook on where I copied the solution down to... Meh...

But the moment I'm finding I'm flying straight over here!

Log in to reply

Log in to reply

Pith Derivative

In fact, all but the bottom fraction are scattered throughout my profile. It's an easter egg hunt ^.^

Log in to reply