# Munchausen Number

A Munchausen Number is a number that is equal to the sum of its digits each raised to a power equal to that digit. It is also called perfect digit-to-digit invariant (PDDI) because of its feature.1 is a Munchausen number. If we consider 0^0 as 0 there is a Munchausen number 438579088. But as 0 is undefined we can't consider this number. There is another Munchausen number besides 1. What is that?

5 years, 6 months ago

MarkdownAppears as
*italics* or _italics_ italics
**bold** or __bold__ bold
- bulleted- list
• bulleted
• list
1. numbered2. list
1. numbered
2. list
Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly
paragraph 1paragraph 2

paragraph 1

paragraph 2

[example link](https://brilliant.org)example link
> This is a quote
This is a quote
    # I indented these lines
# 4 spaces, and now they show
# up as a code block.

print "hello world"
# I indented these lines
# 4 spaces, and now they show
# up as a code block.

print "hello world"
MathAppears as
Remember to wrap math in $$...$$ or $...$ to ensure proper formatting.
2 \times 3 $$2 \times 3$$
2^{34} $$2^{34}$$
a_{i-1} $$a_{i-1}$$
\frac{2}{3} $$\frac{2}{3}$$
\sqrt{2} $$\sqrt{2}$$
\sum_{i=1}^3 $$\sum_{i=1}^3$$
\sin \theta $$\sin \theta$$
\boxed{123} $$\boxed{123}$$

Sort by:

3435 learned it from Numberphile.

- 5 years, 6 months ago

3435

- 5 years, 6 months ago

3435 damn sure

- 5 years, 6 months ago

can anyone give me an exact proof with logical reasoning how 0^0 is undefined?

- 5 years, 6 months ago

yes but I previously mentioned we can't take it as 0^0 is undefined

- 5 years, 6 months ago

exactly wolfram mathworld says there are four munchausen number....they are 0,1,3435,and 438579088.......If the definition (0^(0))=0 is adopted.....

- 5 years, 6 months ago

$$0^0$$ is undefined, remember? Discussion

- 5 years, 6 months ago

but wolfram says if and only if (iff) it(i.e. 0^(0) ) is defined only then the number could be adopted as munchausen number...... i have gone through the discussion ,you mentioned,before many times ....thanxx....but see here....find the statement that i gave is in the last line.....hope you understand my source.....

- 5 years, 6 months ago