Well we think that we have found a nice property of natural numbers which we are unable to explain in all details. So we published it without having any idea why it holds true. You can look at Figure 4 and related description given in the following paper:

http://www.nature.com/articles/srep14280

If you find any hint, let me know in the comments.

Cheers :)

No vote yet

1 vote

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...

Easy Math Editor

`*italics*`

or`_italics_`

italics`**bold**`

or`__bold__`

boldNote: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctlyparagraph 1

paragraph 2

`[example link](https://brilliant.org)`

`> This is a quote`

Remember to wrap math in \( ... \) or \[ ... \] to ensure proper formatting.`2 \times 3`

`2^{34}`

`a_{i-1}`

`\frac{2}{3}`

`\sqrt{2}`

`\sum_{i=1}^3`

`\sin \theta`

`\boxed{123}`

## Comments

Sort by:

TopNewestThis is pretty awesome. It's going to take me a while to digest this paper. I don't normally study network theory, but I'm beginning to see how this sort of thing could be of value in some other branches of theoretical physics. Do I have any hint as to why this property of numbers seems to be true? You're kidding, right? I'll get back to you on that.

Log in to reply

Sure.. contrary to my expectations, nobody thought that this was an interesting note! :D

Log in to reply

Snehal, there's a difference between "not being interested", and "being glassy-eyed". It's a difficult read! It will take ME quite some time to grasp the subject.

Log in to reply

Log in to reply