Hint: All such numbers will be of form \(7k+3\) with \(0 \leq k \leq \lfloor \frac{1000}{7}\rfloor\) (As \(142 \times 7 + 3 < 1000\))
–
Paramjit Singh
·
3 years, 10 months ago

Log in to reply

hint:all such number will form an A.P wih comon diffrence 7.
–
Varad Kausadikar
·
3 years, 10 months ago

Log in to reply

Note that every integer of the form \(7k+3\) is a number that gives a remainder \(3\) when divided \(7\). \(...(1)\)

Equally importantly, whenever an integer divided by \(7\) gives a remainder of \(3\), it must be of the form \(7k+3\). \(...(2)\)

Let \(x\) be such an integer.

So, \(1\leq x \leq 1000 \) \(\Leftrightarrow 1 \leq 7k+3 \leq 1000\) [ For some integer k] \( \Leftrightarrow -2 \leq 7k \leq 997\) \( \Leftrightarrow \frac {-2}{7} \leq k \leq \frac {1000}{7} \)

There are \(143\) integer solutions to this inequality from \(0\) to \(142\). From statement \((1)\), we can say, for each \(k\) we can have a corresponding x satisfying the condition in the problem and from statement \((2)\), we can say, there is no other \(x\)'s other than these which will satisfy the condition. So there are \(143\) integers from \(1\) to \(1000\) which give a remainder of \(3\) when divided by \(7\).

Hope this somewhat helps.
–
Aiman Rafeed
·
3 years, 10 months ago

Log in to reply

@Aiman Rafeed
–
You could condense your first two statements by saying an integer divided by 7 gives a remainder of 3 if and only if the number is of the form \(7k+3\).
–
Tanishq Aggarwal
·
3 years, 10 months ago

Log in to reply

@Tanishq Aggarwal
–
Right, but the meaning of "if and only if" sometimes isn't clear to many people. They confuse it with only "if". That's why I did it.
–
Aiman Rafeed
·
3 years, 10 months ago

Log in to reply

Try it for small numbers (say 1-30) and look for a pattern.
–
Matt McNabb
·
3 years, 10 months ago

Log in to reply

Different hint: Consider \(1\rightarrow 1000\pmod{7}\). How many numbers \(1\le x\le 1000\) are there such that \(x\equiv \pmod{7}\)?
–
Daniel Liu
·
3 years, 10 months ago

@Anshul Agarwal
–
We know that no. should be of the form (7x+3). First no.should be 3 and like this last no. should be 994+3 = 997 . That makes an AP with a =3, last term L =997 and common difference d =7. So, L =a + (n-1)d , where n is the no. of terms
997 =3 + (n-1)* 7,
994= (n-1)* 7,
(n-1)= 142,
n = 143.
–
Anshul Agarwal
·
3 years, 10 months ago

Log in to reply

@Anshul Agarwal
–
good job......solved problem in classical and simplest way unlike dat pappe
–
Suraj Sonule
·
3 years, 10 months ago

@Anshul Agarwal
–
Explain how. This is not a question. Someone has posted this since he/she needs help in this.
–
Paramjit Singh
·
3 years, 10 months ago

## Comments

Sort by:

TopNewestHint: All such numbers will be of form \(7k+3\) with \(0 \leq k \leq \lfloor \frac{1000}{7}\rfloor\) (As \(142 \times 7 + 3 < 1000\)) – Paramjit Singh · 3 years, 10 months ago

Log in to reply

hint:all such number will form an A.P wih comon diffrence 7. – Varad Kausadikar · 3 years, 10 months ago

Log in to reply

Note that every integer of the form \(7k+3\) is a number that gives a remainder \(3\) when divided \(7\). \(...(1)\)

Equally importantly, whenever an integer divided by \(7\) gives a remainder of \(3\), it must be of the form \(7k+3\). \(...(2)\)

Let \(x\) be such an integer.

So, \(1\leq x \leq 1000 \) \(\Leftrightarrow 1 \leq 7k+3 \leq 1000\)

[ For some integer k]\( \Leftrightarrow -2 \leq 7k \leq 997\) \( \Leftrightarrow \frac {-2}{7} \leq k \leq \frac {1000}{7} \)There are \(143\) integer solutions to this inequality from \(0\) to \(142\). From statement \((1)\), we can say, for each \(k\) we can have a corresponding x satisfying the condition in the problem and from statement \((2)\), we can say, there is no other \(x\)'s other than these which will satisfy the condition. So there are \(143\) integers from \(1\) to \(1000\) which give a remainder of \(3\) when divided by \(7\).

Hope this somewhat helps. – Aiman Rafeed · 3 years, 10 months ago

Log in to reply

an integer divided by 7 gives a remainder of 3 if and only if the number is of the form \(7k+3\). – Tanishq Aggarwal · 3 years, 10 months agoLog in to reply

"if and only if"sometimes isn't clear to many people. They confuse it with only"if". That's why I did it. – Aiman Rafeed · 3 years, 10 months agoLog in to reply

Try it for small numbers (say 1-30) and look for a pattern. – Matt McNabb · 3 years, 10 months ago

Log in to reply

Different hint: Consider \(1\rightarrow 1000\pmod{7}\). How many numbers \(1\le x\le 1000\) are there such that \(x\equiv \pmod{7}\)? – Daniel Liu · 3 years, 10 months ago

Log in to reply

143 – Anshul Agarwal · 3 years, 10 months ago

Log in to reply

997 =3 + (n-1)* 7, 994= (n-1)* 7, (n-1)= 142, n = 143. – Anshul Agarwal · 3 years, 10 months ago

Log in to reply

– Suraj Sonule · 3 years, 10 months ago

good job......solved problem in classical and simplest way unlike dat pappeLog in to reply

– Anshul Agarwal · 3 years, 9 months ago

thanksLog in to reply

– Paramjit Singh · 3 years, 10 months ago

Explain how. This is not a question. Someone has posted this since he/she needs help in this.Log in to reply