This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science
related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should
explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments
should further the discussion of math and science.

When posting on Brilliant:

Use the emojis to react to an explanation, whether you're congratulating a job well done , or just really confused .

Ask specific questions about the challenge or the steps in somebody's explanation. Well-posed questions can add a lot to the discussion, but posting "I don't understand!" doesn't help anyone.

Try to contribute something new to the discussion, whether it is an extension, generalization or other idea related to the challenge.

Stay on topic — we're all here to learn more about math and science, not to hear about your favorite get-rich-quick scheme or current world events.

Markdown

Appears as

*italics* or _italics_

italics

**bold** or __bold__

bold

- bulleted - list

bulleted

list

1. numbered 2. list

numbered

list

Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly

Good observation. The answer can be generalised for odd multiples of $\pi$. However, my intent was to only show that the result of raising a negative number to an irrational exponent is complex. Generalisation was not the intent of the comment.

The uniqueness of the resulting complex number is something to ponder on. Is there a better way of approaching such a computation?

@Karan Chatrath
–
Oh. I just meany that because this is the one without any constants, so it should be the principal one, like the principal cube root of unity is 1.

@Karan Chatrath
–
If you were to generalize it, how about e^ki(pi)=.... for k is an odd integer. Forgive me, I do not know how to use the math symbols on this yet.

Easy Math Editor

This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.

When posting on Brilliant:

`*italics*`

or`_italics_`

italics`**bold**`

or`__bold__`

boldNote: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctlyparagraph 1

paragraph 2

`[example link](https://brilliant.org)`

`> This is a quote`

Remember to wrap math in`\(`

...`\)`

or`\[`

...`\]`

to ensure proper formatting.`2 \times 3`

`2^{34}`

`a_{i-1}`

`\frac{2}{3}`

`\sqrt{2}`

`\sum_{i=1}^3`

`\sin \theta`

`\boxed{123}`

## Comments

Sort by:

TopNewestLet $(-1)^{\sqrt{2}}= A$

Then on taking the natural logarithm on both sides:

$\sqrt{2}\ln(-1) = \ln(A)$ Which implies:

$\sqrt{2}\ln(i^2) = \sqrt{2}\ln(e^{i\pi})=\sqrt{2}i\pi= \ln(A)$

Or, $A = e^{i\pi\sqrt{2}} = \cos(\pi\sqrt{2}) + i \sin(\pi\sqrt{2})$

So,

the result is a complex number.Note: $i = \sqrt{-1}$ $e^{i\theta}= \cos(\theta) + i\sin(\theta)$

Log in to reply

Not quite right. $i^2$ can be equal to $e^{3i \pi}$ as well. So the answer could also be $\cos(3\pi \sqrt2) + i \sin(3\pi \sqrt2)$.

Log in to reply

Good observation. The answer can be generalised for odd multiples of $\pi$. However, my intent was to only show that the result of raising a negative number to an irrational exponent is complex. Generalisation was not the intent of the comment.

The uniqueness of the resulting complex number is something to ponder on. Is there a better way of approaching such a computation?

Log in to reply

Log in to reply

Log in to reply

Log in to reply

Log in to reply

SearchOnMath.

TryLog in to reply

Log in to reply

Log in to reply