# Not-so-math and Really-not-math things you could talk about

Abstruse Goose (So many questions)

A few days ago, my friend Alokananda and I had a discussion about not-so-math topics we could write notes about. Here are the ideas we came up with in no particular order:

• How the physics/chemistry/math/anything syllabus is impractical and what could have been a good way to improve it?
• Do students have a cognitive limit, i.e, can anybody learn anything arbitrarily hard?
• What is the dissimilarity between life and mathematics that makes most people think life isn't solvable?
• What is beauty? Is there a thumb rule for defining beauty? Can we explain beauty in terms of simpler things?
• Is there something asymmetric that is beautiful? What makes it beautiful?
• Why we need more doctors than mathematicians or vice-versa?
• Why mathematics is(n't) meaningful?
• Why or why not there is a life after death?
• Why astrology is(n't) justified and if the butterfly effect is relevant?
• Does everything that happen happen for a reason?
• Experiences you look forward to as a doctor
• Why or why not the math class is boring?
• How the entrance exams could have been improved, if hypothetically, you were in power
• Is morality subjective or absolute?
• What you think infinity is? And if there is something that we cannot comprehend about it?
• What is the right way to deal with unfair situations or people? And more importantly what is unfairness?
• What is knowledge? And can we know anything, at all?
• What is truth?
• The Fundamental Existential Problem: Why does anything exist at all?
• No matter how strong the expressing power, can there something conceivable, that a language cannot define
• Fun cooking recipes that you know that'd help being productive as a mathematician

5 years, 3 months ago

This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.

When posting on Brilliant:

• Use the emojis to react to an explanation, whether you're congratulating a job well done , or just really confused .
• Ask specific questions about the challenge or the steps in somebody's explanation. Well-posed questions can add a lot to the discussion, but posting "I don't understand!" doesn't help anyone.
• Try to contribute something new to the discussion, whether it is an extension, generalization or other idea related to the challenge.

MarkdownAppears as
*italics* or _italics_ italics
**bold** or __bold__ bold
- bulleted- list
• bulleted
• list
1. numbered2. list
1. numbered
2. list
Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly
paragraph 1paragraph 2

paragraph 1

paragraph 2

[example link](https://brilliant.org)example link
> This is a quote
This is a quote
    # I indented these lines
# 4 spaces, and now they show
# up as a code block.

print "hello world"
# I indented these lines
# 4 spaces, and now they show
# up as a code block.

print "hello world"
MathAppears as
Remember to wrap math in $$ ... $$ or $ ... $ to ensure proper formatting.
2 \times 3 $2 \times 3$
2^{34} $2^{34}$
a_{i-1} $a_{i-1}$
\frac{2}{3} $\frac{2}{3}$
\sqrt{2} $\sqrt{2}$
\sum_{i=1}^3 $\sum_{i=1}^3$
\sin \theta $\sin \theta$
\boxed{123} $\boxed{123}$

Sort by:

The Fundamental Existential Problem: Why does anything exist at all? "Nothing" is a concept, it's a thing. So, if nothing exists, we have "nothing", right? "Nothing", by the way, has an entropy of $0$, which some argue represents the highest possible order! So, it all starts with God, which is perfect order, which is nothing?

- 5 years, 3 months ago

Are you invoking the Anthropic Principle?

- 5 years, 3 months ago

Actually, no. The Anthropic Principle is loosely based on the idea that the universe that we see is the way it is, otherwise we wouldn't be sitting here talking about it, i.e., of all the possible universes with different laws and conditions, we're going to find ourselves in those universes that permit such ourselves with our ability to observe and think about it. For an notable example, for us to even remember anything, there has to be some irreversibility in the direction of time---not necessarily always the case. But my comment about nothing is nothing about that.

In a nutshell, what I am arguing is that to speak of "nothing existing at all" could be a meaningless concept. What exactly does that mean, and how that can ever be tested? How do we even know that it is possible that there can be such a thing that "there is nothing that exists"? No matter how much you try to achieve "nothingness", you fail and you end up with something that has properties---such as zero entropy, a very special attribute to have.

- 5 years, 3 months ago

That makes sense. Nothingness is probably not that well defined.

- 5 years, 3 months ago

An analogous problem is trying to define "perfect disorder" Go try it. The more you try to create the greatest possible disorder, the more order you'll find in it statistically. Look up "pseudorandom generators". Not easy---it takes a lot of work to create true randomness. It doesn't come easy.

- 5 years, 3 months ago

So then is "nothing" a relative term, in the sense that it can only be defined as the absence of "something"? Or does it have to be so binary; can there be a "state" that is neither one of "nothingness" nor "somethingness"?

- 5 years, 3 months ago

I'm sorry to disagree with you sir but I feel that something of perfect order is something we haven't found not God

- 5 years, 3 months ago

Fear not, Aniruth, it wasn't really a commentary about the attributes of God anyway. I invoked it to make a point. See my reply to Agnishom.

- 5 years, 3 months ago

Now I get what you wanted to say

- 5 years, 3 months ago

My classmate once said this to me when he was really tired:

"What is tuna?" "Is Tuna even real?"

- 5 years, 3 months ago

Were you also tired? What did you tell him. This is interesting

- 5 years, 3 months ago

I was tired too, so I I told him to shut up...

- 5 years, 3 months ago

You spoilt the fun you should have let him continue his rant

- 5 years, 3 months ago

$\huge \text{What is "what" ?}$

- 5 years, 3 months ago

$\huge \text{What!?}$

$\large \text{Who is "who"? When is "when"? Where is "where"? Why is "why"?}$

- 5 years, 3 months ago

Who is "who" ? Ans - Dr. Who

- 5 years, 3 months ago

Or perhaps the World Health Organization .... but I prefer the one with the TARDIS. :)

- 5 years, 3 months ago

"Hwat?" says the proto-Germanic, to which he immediately hears from his neighbors, "hwut?", "wuht?", "hwot?", "hwu-UH...?"

- 5 years, 3 months ago

Was in aller Welt?

- 5 years, 3 months ago