You are given a black-box function, **notrand()**, which returns 0 with 60% probability and 1 with 40% probability. Create a new function, **rand()**, which returns 0 and 1 with equal probability (i.e. 50% each) **using only notrand() as your source of randomness.**

I've heard many interesting approaches to the problem. I'll post my own solution later after hearing some from the community!

## Comments

Sort by:

TopNewestHere is a possible function for rand():

Log in to reply

let a0, a1 use notrand() to assign a value. so a0 = {0: 60%, 1: 40%}, a1 = {0: 60%, 1: 40%}.

Consider a0 + a1:

0(60%) + 0(60%) = 0b00

0(60%) + 1(40%) = 0b01

1(40%) + 0(60%) = 0b01

1(40%) + 1(40%) = 0b10

Note the least significant bit (which can be found with the xor of a0 and a1) has a different weight than the notrand() function, namely:

a0 ⊕ a1 = {0: 52%, 1: 48%}

Now if we combine two of these results (4 calls to notrand() in total) the percentages change again to:

0(52%) ⊕ 0(52%) = 0

0(52%) ⊕ 1(48%) = 1

1(48%) ⊕ 0(52%) = 1

1(48%) ⊕ 1(48%) = 0

or {0: 50.08%, 1: 49.92%}

This pattern will approach 50/50 as the sub iterations get larger, however, the associative property of xor gives one more detail:

((a ⊕ b) ⊕ (c ⊕ d)) ⊕ ((i ⊕ j) ⊕ (k ⊕ l)) = (a ⊕ b ⊕ c ⊕ d ⊕ i ⊕ j ⊕ k ⊕ l)

and so xor'ing multiple calls of notrand() actually brings the function closer to 50/50 regardless of the number of calls used and the order they are combined in. – Brian Rodriguez · 2 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply