Waste less time on Facebook — follow Brilliant.
×

Number Theory

This hypothesis (or theory)

There are no solutions for the following equation,

\({ n }^{ p }={ m }^{ p }-1\)

OR

\({ n }^{ p }={ m }^{ p }-2\)

Where \(p\) is a prime number,

\(n,m\) are positive integers and must be bigger than 1.

Note by Luke Zhang
2 years, 8 months ago

No vote yet
1 vote

  Easy Math Editor

MarkdownAppears as
*italics* or _italics_ italics
**bold** or __bold__ bold

- bulleted
- list

  • bulleted
  • list

1. numbered
2. list

  1. numbered
  2. list
Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly
paragraph 1

paragraph 2

paragraph 1

paragraph 2

[example link](https://brilliant.org)example link
> This is a quote
This is a quote
    # I indented these lines
    # 4 spaces, and now they show
    # up as a code block.

    print "hello world"
# I indented these lines
# 4 spaces, and now they show
# up as a code block.

print "hello world"
MathAppears as
Remember to wrap math in \( ... \) or \[ ... \] to ensure proper formatting.
2 \times 3 \( 2 \times 3 \)
2^{34} \( 2^{34} \)
a_{i-1} \( a_{i-1} \)
\frac{2}{3} \( \frac{2}{3} \)
\sqrt{2} \( \sqrt{2} \)
\sum_{i=1}^3 \( \sum_{i=1}^3 \)
\sin \theta \( \sin \theta \)
\boxed{123} \( \boxed{123} \)

Comments

Sort by:

Top Newest

Isn't this obvious, for any natural number \( p > 2 \)?

The difference of consecutive powers is at least \( 2 ^ p - 1 \).

Calvin Lin Staff - 2 years, 8 months ago

Log in to reply

im sorry. Im not good

Luke Zhang - 2 years, 8 months ago

Log in to reply

I was actually starting to think if this was a troll...

Julian Poon - 2 years, 8 months ago

Log in to reply

Dood, im like 10 times worse than u lol.

Luke Zhang - 2 years, 8 months ago

Log in to reply

@Luke Zhang I dun even know calculus

Luke Zhang - 2 years, 8 months ago

Log in to reply

@Luke Zhang K noted.

Julian Poon - 2 years, 8 months ago

Log in to reply

@Julian Poon Glad that u NOTED.

Luke Zhang - 2 years, 8 months ago

Log in to reply

Can this also be correct instead of 2 if we keep 3,4,5..........

Sudhir Aripirala - 2 years, 8 months ago

Log in to reply

Wait waaaaa?????????? I just gave a comment on it. Not proved it.

And u must state that \(m\) and \(n\) are not \(0,1,-1\)

Julian Poon - 2 years, 8 months ago

Log in to reply

No need to state that because u already said that it must be greater than 1

Sudhir Aripirala - 2 years, 8 months ago

Log in to reply

I asked whether it is true for n^p=m^p-3 or 4 .............

Sudhir Aripirala - 2 years, 8 months ago

Log in to reply

@Sudhir Aripirala I'll give you a clue, then you can figure out for yourself:

\(m^{p}-n^{p}=k\)

The difference between \(2\) consecutive powers are always more than \(k\).

What must \(k\) be?

Julian Poon - 2 years, 8 months ago

Log in to reply

@Julian Poon I understood your theorem. Very good and thanks for making me realize my mistake

Sudhir Aripirala - 2 years, 8 months ago

Log in to reply

@Julian Poon k=k

Luke Zhang - 2 years, 8 months ago

Log in to reply

@Luke Zhang Wooaaahhhh very insightful! Illuminati!

Julian Poon - 2 years, 8 months ago

Log in to reply

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...