This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science
related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should
explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments
should further the discussion of math and science.

When posting on Brilliant:

Use the emojis to react to an explanation, whether you're congratulating a job well done , or just really confused .

Ask specific questions about the challenge or the steps in somebody's explanation. Well-posed questions can add a lot to the discussion, but posting "I don't understand!" doesn't help anyone.

Try to contribute something new to the discussion, whether it is an extension, generalization or other idea related to the challenge.

Stay on topic — we're all here to learn more about math and science, not to hear about your favorite get-rich-quick scheme or current world events.

Markdown

Appears as

*italics* or _italics_

italics

**bold** or __bold__

bold

- bulleted - list

bulleted

list

1. numbered 2. list

numbered

list

Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly

I can't go anywhere with that approach either. But if I just solve it for $=0$, I get the condition $a+b=0$, $b+c=0$, or $c+a=0$, and so the rest becomes easy.

Well I THINK it can be proved without induction.@Nihar Mahajan@Vaibhav Prasad
I will write it in short.
It can easily be derived that $(a+b)(b+c)(a+c)=0$
Now we have 3 cases in first all the 3 terms are 0 , or any 2terms are 0 or only one term is 0.

Case$(a+b)=0$

$a=-b$

So now just substitute a = -b in the equation (which is to be proved)

I will try using this method and tell you about it . But this method does not work when
a or b or c=0 and if its right then it proves 0/0=1 (lol was it so easy)

@Nihar Mahajan
–
@Nihar Mahajan Well actually its the extension of ur approach. In the third line I have replaced a+c by x and then I have explained above.In the end both results in same factors .

Easy Math Editor

This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.

When posting on Brilliant:

`*italics*`

or`_italics_`

italics`**bold**`

or`__bold__`

boldNote: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctlyparagraph 1

paragraph 2

`[example link](https://brilliant.org)`

`> This is a quote`

Remember to wrap math in`\(`

...`\)`

or`\[`

...`\]`

to ensure proper formatting.`2 \times 3`

`2^{34}`

`a_{i-1}`

`\frac{2}{3}`

`\sqrt{2}`

`\sum_{i=1}^3`

`\sin \theta`

`\boxed{123}`

## Comments

Sort by:

TopNewestWell, if the first condition is met, then one of these are true, $a+b=0$, $b+c=0$, $c+a=0$, and so the next condition follows immediately.

Log in to reply

@Michael Mendrin @Calvin Lin Sir , can you extend my approach that I have written above?

Log in to reply

I can't go anywhere with that approach either. But if I just solve it for $=0$, I get the condition $a+b=0$, $b+c=0$, or $c+a=0$, and so the rest becomes easy.

Log in to reply

Well I THINK it can be proved without induction.@Nihar Mahajan @Vaibhav Prasad I will write it in short. It can easily be derived that $(a+b)(b+c)(a+c)=0$ Now we have 3 cases in first all the 3 terms are 0 , or any 2terms are 0 or only one term is 0.

Case$(a+b)=0$

$a=-b$

So now just substitute a = -b in the equation (which is to be proved)

That will give $c^{2n+1} = c^{2n+1}$

Log in to reply

See my approach:

$a^3+b^3+c^3=(a+b+c)^3-3(a+b+c)(ab+bc+ac)+3abc \\ \Rightarrow 3(a+b+c)(ab+bc+ac) = 3abc \\ (a+b+c)\left(\dfrac{ab+bc+ac}{abc}\right)=1 \quad or \quad (a+b+c)\left(\dfrac{1}{a}+\dfrac{1}{b}+\dfrac{1}{c}\right)=1$

Am not able to do more than this...

Log in to reply

I will try using this method and tell you about it . But this method does not work when a or b or c=0 and if its right then it proves 0/0=1 (lol was it so easy)

Log in to reply

$a,b,c \neq 0$.

Yeah , my method hasLog in to reply

Log in to reply

@Nihar Mahajan

Take $a+c=x$ Then $(b+x)(bx+ac) = abc$

Multiplying and simplifying gives us $x(b^{2}+bx+ac )= 0$substitute x Then Further factorizing gives us $a+b)(b+c)(a+c) = 0$

Now the method goes as usual (given in my method).

Log in to reply

@Kalash Verma I understood your method. I am asking , can you extend my approach furthur?

Log in to reply

@Nihar Mahajan Well actually its the extension of ur approach. In the third line I have replaced a+c by x and then I have explained above.In the end both results in same factors .

Log in to reply

@Kalash Verma

Thanks for your help! :)Log in to reply

Log in to reply

Oh ,,, I got your method... Thanks!

Log in to reply

Induction on $n$ ??

Log in to reply

Most probably .. xD

Log in to reply

I always prefer induction... even though it's kind of a shortcut

Log in to reply