I can't go anywhere with that approach either. But if I just solve it for $=0$, I get the condition $a+b=0$, $b+c=0$, or $c+a=0$, and so the rest becomes easy.

Well I THINK it can be proved without induction.@Nihar Mahajan@Vaibhav Prasad
I will write it in short.
It can easily be derived that $(a+b)(b+c)(a+c)=0$
Now we have 3 cases in first all the 3 terms are 0 , or any 2terms are 0 or only one term is 0.

Case$(a+b)=0$

$a=-b$

So now just substitute a = -b in the equation (which is to be proved)

I will try using this method and tell you about it . But this method does not work when
a or b or c=0 and if its right then it proves 0/0=1 (lol was it so easy)

@Nihar Mahajan
–
@Nihar Mahajan Well actually its the extension of ur approach. In the third line I have replaced a+c by x and then I have explained above.In the end both results in same factors .

$</code> ... <code>$</code>...<code>."> Easy Math Editor

`*italics*`

or`_italics_`

italics`**bold**`

or`__bold__`

boldNote: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctlyparagraph 1

paragraph 2

`[example link](https://brilliant.org)`

`> This is a quote`

Remember to wrap math in $</span> ... <span>$ or $</span> ... <span>$ to ensure proper formatting.`2 \times 3`

`2^{34}`

`a_{i-1}`

`\frac{2}{3}`

`\sqrt{2}`

`\sum_{i=1}^3`

`\sin \theta`

`\boxed{123}`

## Comments

Sort by:

TopNewestWell, if the first condition is met, then one of these are true, $a+b=0$, $b+c=0$, $c+a=0$, and so the next condition follows immediately.

Log in to reply

@Michael Mendrin @Calvin Lin Sir , can you extend my approach that I have written above?

Log in to reply

I can't go anywhere with that approach either. But if I just solve it for $=0$, I get the condition $a+b=0$, $b+c=0$, or $c+a=0$, and so the rest becomes easy.

Log in to reply

Well I THINK it can be proved without induction.@Nihar Mahajan @Vaibhav Prasad I will write it in short. It can easily be derived that $(a+b)(b+c)(a+c)=0$ Now we have 3 cases in first all the 3 terms are 0 , or any 2terms are 0 or only one term is 0.

Case$(a+b)=0$

$a=-b$

So now just substitute a = -b in the equation (which is to be proved)

That will give $c^{2n+1} = c^{2n+1}$

Log in to reply

See my approach:

$a^3+b^3+c^3=(a+b+c)^3-3(a+b+c)(ab+bc+ac)+3abc \\ \Rightarrow 3(a+b+c)(ab+bc+ac) = 3abc \\ (a+b+c)\left(\dfrac{ab+bc+ac}{abc}\right)=1 \quad or \quad (a+b+c)\left(\dfrac{1}{a}+\dfrac{1}{b}+\dfrac{1}{c}\right)=1$

Am not able to do more than this...

Log in to reply

I will try using this method and tell you about it . But this method does not work when a or b or c=0 and if its right then it proves 0/0=1 (lol was it so easy)

Log in to reply

$a,b,c \neq 0$.

Yeah , my method hasLog in to reply

Log in to reply

@Nihar Mahajan

Take $a+c=x$ Then $(b+x)(bx+ac) = abc$

Multiplying and simplifying gives us $x(b^{2}+bx+ac )= 0$substitute x Then Further factorizing gives us $a+b)(b+c)(a+c) = 0$

Now the method goes as usual (given in my method).

Log in to reply

@Kalash Verma I understood your method. I am asking , can you extend my approach furthur?

Log in to reply

@Nihar Mahajan Well actually its the extension of ur approach. In the third line I have replaced a+c by x and then I have explained above.In the end both results in same factors .

Log in to reply

@Kalash Verma

Thanks for your help! :)Log in to reply

Log in to reply

Oh ,,, I got your method... Thanks!

Log in to reply

Induction on $n$ ??

Log in to reply

Most probably .. xD

Log in to reply

I always prefer induction... even though it's kind of a shortcut

Log in to reply