After Part 1 and Part 2, here's Part 3, with some problems from previous Maths Olympiads.

**1** Solve the following system for real triplets \((x,y,z)\) \[x+y-z=4; x^2-y^2+z^2=-4; xyz=6\]

**2** Let \(A_1, A_2,..............,A_n\) be the vertices of an \(n\) sided regular polygon in that order. Determine \(n\), given that
\[\dfrac{1}{A_1A_2}=\dfrac{1}{A_1A_3}+\dfrac{1}{A_1A_4}\]

**3** Let \(ABCD\) be a quadrilateral inscribed in a circle. Suppose \(\overline{AB}=\sqrt{2+\sqrt{2}}\) and \(\overline{AB}\) subtends an angle of \(135^{\circ}\) at the centre of the circle. Find the maximum possible area of the quadrilateral \(ABCD\).

**4** Let \(a,b,c\) be positive real numbers such that \(a^3+b^3=c^3\). Prove that \(a^2+b^2-c^2>6(c-a)(c-b)\)

**5** Find all real numbers \(x\) such that \([x^2+2x]=[x]^2+2[x]\), where \([n]\) denotes the greatest integer less than or equal to \(n\).

**6** In a book of page numbers from \(1\) to \(100\), some pages are torn off. The sum of the numbers on the remaining pages is \(4949\). How many pages are torn off?

Try 'em all, and as always, please post your approaches as comments and don't forget to like, reshare, and enjoy!

## Comments

Sort by:

TopNewest3.Is the answer for 6) \(\frac{3\sqrt{3}+5}{4\sqrt{2}}\) – Souryajit Roy · 2 years, 2 months ago

Log in to reply

Q2. Ans is n=7. I did it using trigo, but later found out that this can be done using Ptolemy's theorem too – Racchit Jain · 1 year, 2 months ago

Log in to reply

6) Suppose \(x\) pages are torn off.The page numbers on both sides of a page are of the form \(2a-1\) and \(2a\) and their sum is \(4a-1\).This is the crux move!

So,the sum of numbers of pages torn=\((4a_{1}-1)+..(4a_{x}-1)=4(a_{1}+...+a_{x})-x\)

Sum total of all pages=\(1+2+...+101=5050\)

So,\(4(a_{1}+...+a_{x})-x=101\).So,\(x≡3\) (mod \(4\)).

Now,show that \(x<7\) (proceed by contradiction)

So,\(x=3\) is the only option.Also, note that \(a_{1}+a_{2}+a_{3}=26\).One can choose distinct positive integers \(a_{1},a_{2},a_{3}\) in several ways. – Souryajit Roy · 2 years, 2 months ago

Log in to reply

5)Adding \(1\) to both sides,\([(x+1)]^{2}]=([x]+1)^{2}=([x+1])^{2}\)

Case 1:\(x+1≤0\)Now,\([(x+1)]^{2}]≥(x+1)^2≥([x+1])^{2}=[(x+1)]^{2}]\).

Hence,there must be equality in every step.So,\([x+1]=x+1\) i.e, x is an integer.So,\(x=-1,-2,-3,....\)

Case 2:\(x+1>0\)Now,\((x+1)^2≥[(x+1)^{2}]=([x+1])^{2}=\) and also,\((x+1)^2≤1+[(x+1)^{2}]=1+([x+1])^{2}\)

So,\([x]+1=[x+1]≤x+1≤\sqrt{1+([x+1])^{2}}=\sqrt{1+([x]+1)^{2}}\)

Hence,\(x\) belongs to \([n,\sqrt{1+(n+1)^{2}}-1]\) for any integer \(n≥-1\). – Souryajit Roy · 2 years, 2 months ago

Log in to reply

2)The question number 2 is easy to solve with complex numbers.But also found a geometric solution.

Let the polygon be \(n\)- sided.

Suppose the vertex after \(A_{4}\) be \(A_{5}\).Hence the \(5\) consecutive vertices are \(A_{1},A_{2},A_{3},A_{4},A_{5}\) ( arranged anticlockwise from \(A_{1}\) to \(A_{5}\),say)

Firstly,\(\frac{1}{A_{1}A_{2}}=\frac{1}{A_{1}A_{3}}+\frac{1}{A_{1}A_{4}}\) gives

\(A_{1}A_{3}.A_{1}A_{4}=A_{1}A_{2}.A_{1}A_{4}+A_{1}A_{2}.A_{1}A_{3}\)...\((1)\)

One can easily show that quadrilateral \(A_{1}A_{3}A_{4}A_{5}\) is cyclic.

So,by Ptolemy's theorem, \(A_{1}A_{5}.A_{3}A_{4}+A_{1}A_{3}.A_{5}A_{4}=A_{1}A_{4}.A_{5}A_{3}\)...\((2)\)

Also,since the polygon is regular,we have \(A_{1}A_{2}=A_{3}A_{4}=A_{4}A_{5}\) and \(A_{5}A_{3}=A_{1}A_{3}\).

So,from \((1)\), \(A_{1}A_{2}.A_{1}A_{4}+A_{1}A_{2}.A_{1}A_{3}=A_{1}A_{3}.A_{1}A_{4}=A_{3}A_{5}.A_{1}A_{4}=A_{1}A_{5}.A_{3}A_{4}+A_{1}A_{3}.A_{5}A_{4}=A_{1}A_{5}.A_{1}A_{2}+A_{1}A_{3}.A_{1}A_{2}\)

Hence,\(A_{1}A_{4}=A_{1}A_{5}\).

Since,these two diagonals are equal,number of vertices between \(A_{1}\) and \(A_{5}\)(moving clockwise) equals the number of vertices between \(A_{1}\) and \(A_{4}\)(moving anti-clockwise).

Hence,\(n-5=2\) or \(n=7\). – Souryajit Roy · 2 years, 2 months ago

Log in to reply

solution to problem2:- sum of no on 100 pages =5050 sum of torn pages =5050-4949=101 sum on tearing 1 page with no r=r +r+1=2r+1 if n pages are torn 2<r1+r2+r3...............+rn>+n=101 observe that sum of no on each side of page is of form 4k +3 i.e. (2k+1)+(2k+2) =>4<k1 +................................+kn>+3n=101 =>3n is1 (mod4)=>n is3(mod4) therefore n=4r+3 for some r an integer >or=0 if r>0,n>or =7 => 4 <k1+.....................kn>+3n> 4<0+1+2+3+4+5+6.>+21=4<21>+21=105>101, contradict therefore n=3 there fore 3 pages are torn – Sauditya Yo Yo · 2 years, 2 months ago

Log in to reply

Thanks for the questions. Also, do you have the solutions to these questions? – Curtis Clement · 2 years, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

Ans.6 Only 2 pages are torn off The sum of integers from 1 to 100 is 5050.

If two pages are torn off the sum of the remaining pages is 4949.

101 is the sum of the torn pages which can not be achieved in the tearing of 3 pages. – Mehul Arora · 2 years, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

– Curtis Clement · 2 years, 3 months ago

Actually wouldn't you tear out 1 page because if the pages have a number on the front and back (like any book) then you would just tear out the one with a 50 on one side and a 51 on the other.Log in to reply

– Mehul Arora · 2 years, 3 months ago

Yeah. That could be a possible solution too!!Log in to reply

How about these 3 pages torn

\(83 + 17 + 1 = 101\) – Krishna Sharma · 2 years, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

– Satvik Golechha · 2 years, 3 months ago

I think that since it's a book, you must tear pairs of pages. That is, you can't tear page \(83\) without tearing \(84\) with it.Log in to reply

– Aditya Chauhan · 1 year, 7 months ago

Yes. I believe one page is torn and the page numbers it contain are 50 & 51Log in to reply

I m getting \(1 + \dfrac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\) – Krishna Sharma · 2 years, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

– Satvik Golechha · 2 years, 3 months ago

How?Log in to reply

I think 1 variable is not adequate you have to take 2 variables – Krishna Sharma · 2 years, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

– Mehul Arora · 2 years, 2 months ago

Along with page 83, Either of page 82 or 84 will be torn. With 17 either 18 or 16 will be torn. Hence this is not a possible solution.Log in to reply

Squaring

\(x^{2} + z^{2} - 2xz = 16 + y^{2} - 8y\)

\(x^{2} - y^{2} + z^{2} = 16 + 2xz -8y\)

With the help of second equation

\(16 + 2xz - 8y = -4\)

With the help of third equation

\(4 + \dfrac{3}{y} - 2y = -1\)

From here we get

\(y = 3, \dfrac{-1}{2}\)

Now \(x, z\) can easily be found

When \(y = 3 \) we get 2 pairs of \((x,z)\)

\((2,1)\), \((-1,-2)\)

When \(y = \frac{-1}{2}\) \(x,z\) comes out imaginary

Finally we get 2 solutions of \((x,y,z)\)

\((2,3,1)\)

\((-1,3,-2)\)

2) Answer is

7can be proved with complex numbers5) Answer is \(\infty \) put x any integer – Krishna Sharma · 2 years, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

– Satvik Golechha · 2 years, 3 months ago

Please post solution of answer \(2\) also. I want to see your complex numbers method. Thanks!Log in to reply

\(a = 2R sin(\dfrac{\theta}{2}) \)

Where \(\theta = \dfrac{2\pi}{n}\) is angle made at centre

\[\dfrac{1}{a_1{a}_2} = \dfrac{1}{{a}_1{a}_3} + \dfrac{1}{{a}_1{a}_4} \]

\(\dfrac{1}{2R sin(\frac{\pi}{n})} = \dfrac{1}{2R sin(\frac{2\pi}{n})} + \dfrac{1}{2Rsin(\frac{3\pi}{n})} \)

Now let \(\displaystyle x = \dfrac{\pi}{n}\)

\(\displaystyle \dfrac{1}{sinx} = \dfrac{1}{sin2x} + \dfrac{1}{sin3x}\)

\(\displaystyle \dfrac{sin2x.sin3x}{sinx} = sin2x + sin3x\)

\(\displaystyle 2cosx.sin3x = sin2x + sin3x\)

\(\displaystyle sin4x + sin2x = sin2x + sin3x\)

\(sin4x = sin3x\)

\(4x + 3x = \pi\)

\(x = \dfrac{\pi}{7} = \dfrac{\pi}{n}\)

\(n = \boxed{\boxed{7}}\) – Krishna Sharma · 2 years, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

– Racchit Jain · 1 year, 2 months ago

Did it the same way!Log in to reply

– Calvin Lin Staff · 2 years, 3 months ago

For 5, you are asked to "find all real numbers \(x\) ...". You are not asked to find the total number of real numbers.Log in to reply

– Curtis Clement · 2 years, 3 months ago

So would putting \({x}\) is any integer be a suitable answer?Log in to reply

x = I + f

Substituting to get final result as

\(\lfloor{f^{2} + 2f(I +1)}\rfloor = 0 \)

We have to make cases

When \(I < -1, f ≠ 0 \)

No value of x satify the condition

When \(I = -1 \) we will get \(0 < f < 1\)

When \(I = 0\) we will get \( 0 < f < \sqrt{2} - 1\)

As we go on increasing value of 'I' the range value of 'f' will go on decreasing.

This doesn't look good I think there is a better solution – Krishna Sharma · 2 years, 3 months ago

Log in to reply