Optics section on brilliant?

Shouldn't there be an optics section on brilliant. Optics is just like any other topic from which a large number of challenging and interesting questions, both theoretical and numerical can be made. In my view it would just boost up brilliant's performance and give it another level

Note by Akul Agrawal
5 years, 1 month ago

This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.

When posting on Brilliant:

• Use the emojis to react to an explanation, whether you're congratulating a job well done , or just really confused .
• Ask specific questions about the challenge or the steps in somebody's explanation. Well-posed questions can add a lot to the discussion, but posting "I don't understand!" doesn't help anyone.
• Try to contribute something new to the discussion, whether it is an extension, generalization or other idea related to the challenge.

MarkdownAppears as
*italics* or _italics_ italics
**bold** or __bold__ bold
- bulleted- list
• bulleted
• list
1. numbered2. list
1. numbered
2. list
Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly
paragraph 1paragraph 2

paragraph 1

paragraph 2

[example link](https://brilliant.org)example link
> This is a quote
This is a quote
    # I indented these lines
# 4 spaces, and now they show
# up as a code block.

print "hello world"
# I indented these lines
# 4 spaces, and now they show
# up as a code block.

print "hello world"
MathAppears as
Remember to wrap math in $$ ... $$ or $ ... $ to ensure proper formatting.
2 \times 3 $2 \times 3$
2^{34} $2^{34}$
a_{i-1} $a_{i-1}$
\frac{2}{3} $\frac{2}{3}$
\sqrt{2} $\sqrt{2}$
\sum_{i=1}^3 $\sum_{i=1}^3$
\sin \theta $\sin \theta$
\boxed{123} $\boxed{123}$

Sort by:

That would be a really nice step!

- 5 years ago

I think it is fine if optics continue to be under classical mechanics. Should Optics be a topic that no one goes to, it would defeat the purpose and also reduce the popularity of optic questions.

- 5 years, 1 month ago

I want your comments @Deepanshu Gupta , @Ronak Agarwal , @Julian Poon

- 5 years, 1 month ago

What say @Calvin Lin sir

- 5 years, 1 month ago

It is on the list of things to do. However, since we have a small team, and have to choose what areas to focus on.

Currently, I do not see problems coming in from the community that indicates they want an optics section.

Staff - 5 years, 1 month ago

No matter...! but the site is doing a great deal... of course. And as for the optics section, I believe it would definitely come some day for physics is completely incomplete without it.

- 5 years, 1 month ago

The simplest way you can make that come earlier, is to post more Optics problems :)

Ditto for particular sections that you are interested in.

Staff - 5 years, 1 month ago

But yes... it would be difficult for you and your team to sort out questions of a particular topic as they would be posted under different sections.

- 5 years ago

That would be a good problem to have. Let us worry about that :)

Staff - 5 years ago

Thank You sir

- 5 years, 1 month ago

Completely agree.

- 5 years, 1 month ago